Paper · 2006 · Acta Horticulturae

OPTIMIZATION OF LIGHTING SPECTRUM FOR PHOTOSYNTHETIC SYSTEM AND PRODUCTIVITY OF LETTUCE BY USING LIGHT-EMITTING DIODES

A. Brazaityté; R. Ulinskaité; P. Duchovskis; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
37
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Impact of controlled illumination spectrum on photosynthetic system and productivity of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. cv. Grand Rapids) grown in phytotron was investigated. The variable-spectrum lighting modules were designed using four types of high-power light-emitting diodes (LEDs) with emission peaked in red at the wavelengths of 660 nm and 640 nm, in blue at 455 nm, and in far-red at 735 nm. Biometric characteristics, pigments content and photosynthesis intensity in lettuce grown under eight different light irradiance were measured and compared. A corresponding experiment under a conventional high-pressure sodium lamp was also performed for reference. The treatments were carried out under photoperiod of 14 h and 21/15˚C (day/night) temperature. Lettuce was grown for 29 days after sowing in a phytotron chamber. Stomata size of lettuce grown under LED was larger than that of the plants growing under high-pressure sodium lamp. The lowest number and largest size of stomata were observed under light without the red component, peaked at 660 nm. Elimination of the blue component (455 nm) resulted in an enhancement of fresh mass production and increased leaf area, but the photosynthetic productivity did not show similar effect. The chlorophylls content in lettuce leaves was high during the entire growth period, but strongly decreased at the end of the treatment without blue light. The photosynthesis in lettuce leaves was most intensive under irradiance without the far-red component (735 nm). We conclude that productivity of lettuce can be optimized by adjusting the light spectrum and flux density.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LED lighting produced larger lettuce stomata than high-pressure sodium lighting.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
LEDe0
Outcome
Stomata sizee0
Direction
largere0
Comparator
high-pressure sodium lampe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“LETTUCE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“Stomata size of lettuce grown under LED was larger than that of the plants growing under high-pressure sodium lamp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–939 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light without the 660 nm red component produced the lowest stomata number.

Taxon
LETTUCELactuca sativat0
Treatment
light without the red component, peaked at 660 nme0
Outcome
numbere0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“LETTUCE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“The lowest number and largest size of stomata were observed under light without the red component, peaked at 660 nm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1056 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light without the 660 nm red component produced the largest stomata size.

Taxon
LETTUCELactuca sativat0
Treatment
light without the red component, peaked at 660 nme0
Outcome
size of stomatae0
Direction
largeste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“LETTUCE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“The lowest number and largest size of stomata were observed under light without the red component, peaked at 660 nm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1056 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Removing the blue component increased fresh mass production and leaf area.

Taxon
LETTUCELactuca sativat0
Treatment
Elimination of the blue component (455 nm)e0
Outcome
fresh mass production and increased leaf areae0
Direction
enhancemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“LETTUCE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“Elimination of the blue component (455 nm) resulted in an enhancement of fresh mass production and increased leaf area, but the photosynthetic productivity did not show similar effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1241 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Removing the blue component did not yield a similar increase in photosynthetic productivity.

Taxon
LETTUCELactuca sativat0
Treatment
Elimination of the blue component (455 nm)e0
Outcome
photosynthetic productivitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“LETTUCE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“Elimination of the blue component (455 nm) resulted in an enhancement of fresh mass production and increased leaf area, but the photosynthetic productivity did not show similar effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1241 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll content fell strongly at the end of the blue-light-free treatment.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
treatment without blue lighte0
Outcome
chlorophylls contente0
Direction
strongly decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“LETTUCE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“The chlorophylls content in lettuce leaves was high during the entire growth period, but strongly decreased at the end of the treatment without blue light.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1397 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lettuce leaf photosynthesis was most intense without the far-red component.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
irradiance without the far-red component (735 nm)e0
Outcome
photosynthesise0
Direction
most intensivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“LETTUCE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“The photosynthesis in lettuce leaves was most intensive under irradiance without the far-red component (735 nm).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1398–1510 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude lettuce productivity can be optimized by adjusting light spectrum and flux density.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
adjusting the light spectrum and flux densitye0
Outcome
productivitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“LETTUCE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“We conclude that productivity of lettuce can be optimized by adjusting the light spectrum and flux density.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1511–1618 · show in text ↑

light · molecular: metabolites · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 42 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

light · physiology: photosynthesis · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

75 papers: 56 positive, 19 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.