Paper · 2016 · Australian Journal of Crop Science

Variation in nitrogen uptake efficiency in upland rice landraces as influenced by P fertilization

Adibah Mohd Amin; Zaharah Abdul Rahman; Mohamed Hanafi Musa; et al.

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Upland rice are usually planted on infertile soils that have been eroded and degraded. The high fertilizer inputs to poor nitrogen (N) content soils can increase plant production but are neither economically viable nor sustainable. Hence, this study was focused on P fertilizers effects on N use efficiency (NUE) of five upland rice landraces which was conducted at Carey Island, Selangor. The study was evaluated using two phosphorus levels (0 and 100 kg P/ha). A factorial experiment was conducted with four replications in randomized complete block design (RCBD). Ammonium sulphate fertilizer [( 15 NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 ] with 1% N-15 atom excess was applied as N-labelled fertilizer at the rate of 150 kg N/ha. The source of K in the form of muriate of potash was applied also at the same rate. Destructive sampling was carried out at week 4, 8 and 16 after transplanting and the NUE of the landraces were evaluated using isotope dilution technique. The P fertilization had no significant effect on NUE as well as on dry matter yield. These results suggested that P is not one of the limiting factors in plant growth and production as well as nitrogen use efficiency of these selected upland rice landraces. The dry matter yield and NUE were not significantly different among landraces at week 4 as the plants undergo their vegetative growth. These upland rice landraces showed significant differences in dry matter yield and nitrogen use efficiency at maturity stage (16 weeks). Landrace I showed significantly lower NUE compared to other landraces at week 16, while landrace III is the most efficient in utilizing nitrogen for production of dry matter.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus fertilization had no significant effect on nitrogen use efficiency in upland rice landraces.

Taxon
upland rice landracest0
Treatment
P fertilizatione0
Outcome
NUEe0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The P fertilization had no significant effect on NUE as well as on dry matter yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1031 · show in text ↑
t0

“upland rice landraces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus fertilization had no significant effect on dry matter yield in upland rice landraces.

Taxon
upland rice landracest0
Treatment
P fertilizatione0
Outcome
dry matter yielde0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The P fertilization had no significant effect on NUE as well as on dry matter yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1031 · show in text ↑
t0

“upland rice landraces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter yield did not differ significantly among upland rice landraces at week 4.

Taxon
upland rice landracest0
Organ / stage
week 4e0
Outcome
dry matter yielde0
Direction
not significantly differente0

Verbatim

e0

“The dry matter yield and NUE were not significantly different among landraces at week 4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1292 · show in text ↑
t0

“upland rice landraces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen use efficiency did not differ significantly among upland rice landraces at week 4.

Taxon
upland rice landracest0
Organ / stage
week 4e0
Outcome
NUEe0
Direction
not significantly differente0

Verbatim

e0

“The dry matter yield and NUE were not significantly different among landraces at week 4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1292 · show in text ↑
t0

“upland rice landraces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Upland rice landraces differed significantly in dry matter yield at maturity.

Taxon
upland rice landracese0
Organ / stage
maturity stage (16 weeks)e0
Outcome
dry matter yielde0
Direction
significant differencese0

Verbatim

e0

“These upland rice landraces showed significant differences in dry matter yield and nitrogen use efficiency at maturity stage (16 weeks).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1476 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Upland rice landraces differed significantly in nitrogen use efficiency at maturity.

Taxon
upland rice landracese0
Organ / stage
maturity stage (16 weeks)e0
Outcome
nitrogen use efficiencye0
Direction
significant differencese0

Verbatim

e0

“These upland rice landraces showed significant differences in dry matter yield and nitrogen use efficiency at maturity stage (16 weeks).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1476 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Landrace I had significantly lower nitrogen use efficiency than other landraces at week 16.

Taxon
upland rice landracest0
Material
Landrace Ie0
Organ / stage
week 16e0
Outcome
NUEe0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
other landracese0

Verbatim

e0

“Landrace I showed significantly lower NUE compared to other landraces at week 16”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1477–1557 · show in text ↑
t0

“upland rice landraces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Landrace III was the most efficient landrace in nitrogen use for dry matter production.

Taxon
upland rice landracest0
Material
landrace IIIe0
Outcome
utilizing nitrogen for production of dry mattere0
Direction
most efficiente0

Verbatim

e0

“landrace III is the most efficient in utilizing nitrogen for production of dry matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1565–1650 · show in text ↑
t0

“upland rice landraces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–64 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

220 papers: 202 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 202 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

216 papers more in this group

See all 220 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

271 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,183 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.