Paper · 2013 · Acta Horticulturae

EFFECTS OF BIOFERTILIZERS ON GAS EXCHANGE, YIELD AND QUALITY OF SOME BROCCOLI CULTIVARS IN ORGANIC FARMING

F. Boari; N. Calabrese; M. Renna; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Results of a field research to study the effects of biofertilizers applied by fertigation on gas exchange, yield and quality parameters of broccoli are reported. The trial has been carried out in winter period in Valenzano (BA, Southern Italy) on a sandy clay-loam soil. Three levels of organic fertilization (0, 60 and 120 kg ha-1 of NewFert based on fleshing hydrolyzed, on 4 cultivar of broccoli (‘Marathon’, ‘Lord’, ‘Chevalier’, ‘Iron’), were compared. For the ‘Marathon’ was compared also seedlings grown conventionally with seedlings organically grown (‘Marathon’ org.). Gas exchange (net assimilation – A, transpiration – T, stomatal conductance – gs), water use efficiency (WUE), yield and quality were detected. The different fertilizer treatments have not affected significantly yield and quality with the exception of the diameter of the inflorescence which increased with the increase of the dose of biofertilizer and ascorbic acid content that, instead, was reduced. The cultivars showed good qualitative characteristics especially nitrate content that did not exceed 350 mg kg-1 f.w. The most productive cultivar was ‘Chevalier’ (11.8 t ha-1). Nitrate content was low, particularly in ‘Lord’ and ‘Marathon’ (160.9 mg kg-1 f.w.), while a high level of ascorbic acid was recorded for ‘Chevalier’ and ‘Iron’ (71.9 mg 100 g-1 f.w.). ‘Chevalier’ and ‘Iron’ presented the best characteristics for what concern colour, more green and shiny. The type of seedlings did not result in significant effects on gas exchange, yield and quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer treatments did not significantly affect broccoli yield and quality

Treatment
fertilizer treatmentse1
Outcome
yield and qualitye1
Direction
not affected significantlye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality parameters of broccoli are reported”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–160 · show in text ↑
e1

“The different fertilizer treatments have not affected significantly yield and quality with the exception of the diameter of the inflorescence which increased with the increase of the dose of biofertilizer and ascorbic acid content that, instead, was reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–978 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer dose increased broccoli inflorescence diameter

Treatment
biofertilizere1
Outcome
diameter of the inflorescencee1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality parameters of broccoli are reported”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–160 · show in text ↑
e1

“The different fertilizer treatments have not affected significantly yield and quality with the exception of the diameter of the inflorescence which increased with the increase of the dose of biofertilizer and ascorbic acid content that, instead, was reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–978 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer dose reduced broccoli ascorbic acid content

Treatment
biofertilizere1
Outcome
ascorbic acid contente1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality parameters of broccoli are reported”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–160 · show in text ↑
e1

“The different fertilizer treatments have not affected significantly yield and quality with the exception of the diameter of the inflorescence which increased with the increase of the dose of biofertilizer and ascorbic acid content that, instead, was reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–978 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broccoli cultivars had nitrate content that did not exceed 350 mg/kg fresh weight

Outcome
nitrate contente2
Value
350 mg kg-1 f.w.e2
Qualifier
did not exceede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality parameters of broccoli are reported”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–160 · show in text ↑
e2

“The cultivars showed good qualitative characteristics especially nitrate content that did not exceed 350 mg kg-1 f.w.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1097 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar Chevalier was the most productive broccoli cultivar at 11.8 t/ha

Material
Chevaliere3
Outcome
productivee3
Value
11.8 t ha-1e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality parameters of broccoli are reported”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–160 · show in text ↑
e3

“The most productive cultivar was ‘Chevalier’ (11.8 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1156 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate content was low in cultivars Lord and Marathon, at 160.9 mg/kg fresh weight

Material
‘Lord’ and ‘Marathon’e4
Outcome
Nitrate contente4
Direction
lowe4
Value
160.9 mg kg-1 f.w.e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality parameters of broccoli are reported”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–160 · show in text ↑
e4

“Nitrate content was low, particularly in ‘Lord’ and ‘Marathon’ (160.9 mg kg-1 f.w.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1241 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivars Chevalier and Iron had a high ascorbic acid level of 71.9 mg/100 g fresh weight

Material
‘Chevalier’ and ‘Iron’e5
Outcome
ascorbic acide5
Direction
high levele5
Value
71.9 mg 100 g-1 f.w.e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality parameters of broccoli are reported”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–160 · show in text ↑
e5

“a high level of ascorbic acid was recorded for ‘Chevalier’ and ‘Iron’ (71.9 mg 100 g-1 f.w.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1341 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivars Chevalier and Iron had the best colour characteristics, greener and shinier

Material
‘Chevalier’ and ‘Iron’e6
Outcome
coloure6
Qualifier
more green and shinye6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality parameters of broccoli are reported”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–160 · show in text ↑
e6

“‘Chevalier’ and ‘Iron’ presented the best characteristics for what concern colour, more green and shiny”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1446 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedling type did not significantly affect gas exchange, yield or quality of broccoli

Treatment
type of seedlingse1
Outcome
gas exchange, yield and qualitye1
Direction
did not result in significant effectse1
Comparator
seedlings grown conventionallye2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality parameters of broccoli are reported”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–160 · show in text ↑
e1

“The type of seedlings did not result in significant effects on gas exchange, yield and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1448–1542 · show in text ↑
e2

“For the ‘Marathon’ was compared also seedlings grown conventionally with seedlings organically grown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–557 · show in text ↑

inoculation · quality: phytochemicals · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

fertilization · quality: general · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

57 papers: 50 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 50 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

inoculation · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

58 papers: 49 positive, 9 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

54 papers more in this group

See all 58 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.