Paper · 2017 · Agronomy

Is There a Positive Synergistic Effect of Biochar and Compost Soil Amendments on Plant Growth and Physiological Performance?

M. Seehausen; Nigel Gale; Stefana Dranga; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
79
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The combination of biochar (BC) with compost has been suggested to be a promising strategy to promote plant growth and performance, but although “synergistic” effects have been stated to occur, full-factorial experiments are few, and explicit tests for synergism are lacking. We tested the hypothesis that a combination of BC and spent mushroom substrate (SMS) has a positive synergistic effect on plant growth and physiological performance in a nutrient-limited growing media. A greenhouse experiment with a full factorial design was conducted using mixed-wood BC (3.0 kg·m−2) and SMS (1.5 kg·m−2) (the combination was not co-composted) as organic soil amendments for the annual Abutilon theophrasti and the perennial Salix purpurea. Several measurements related to plant growth and physiological performance were taken throughout the experiment. Contrary to the hypothesis, we found that the combination of BC + SMS had neutral or antagonistic interactive effects on many plant growth traits. Antagonistic effects were found on maximum leaf area, above- and belowground biomass, reproductive allocation, maximum plant height, chlorophyll fluorescence, and stomatal conductance of A. theophrasti. The effect on S. purpurea was mostly neutral. We conclude that the generalization that BC and compost have synergistic effects on plant performance is not supported.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BC plus SMS had neutral or antagonistic interactions for many plant growth traits.

Taxon
Abutilon theophrastiAbutilon theophrastie1
Treatment
BC + SMSe0
Outcome
plant growth traitse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abutilon theophrasti
Abutilon theophrasti · TaxonI.Sáček, senior · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combination of BC + SMS had neutral or antagonistic interactive effects on many plant growth traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–993 · show in text ↑
e1

“Abutilon theophrasti and the perennial Salix purpurea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–733 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BC and SMS interacted antagonistically on maximum leaf area, biomass and plant height in A. theophrasti.

Taxon
A. theophrastiAbutilon theophrastie0
Treatment
BC + SMSe1
Outcome
maximum leaf area, above- and belowground biomasse0
Direction
Antagonistice0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abutilon theophrasti
Abutilon theophrasti · TaxonI.Sáček, senior · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Antagonistic effects were found on maximum leaf area, above- and belowground biomass, reproductive allocation, maximum plant height, chlorophyll fluorescence, and stomatal conductance of A. theophrasti”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1196 · show in text ↑
e1

“combination of BC + SMS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–917 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BC and SMS interacted antagonistically on reproductive allocation in A. theophrasti.

Taxon
A. theophrastiAbutilon theophrastie0
Treatment
BC + SMSe1
Outcome
reproductive allocatione0
Direction
Antagonistice0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abutilon theophrasti
Abutilon theophrasti · TaxonI.Sáček, senior · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Antagonistic effects were found on maximum leaf area, above- and belowground biomass, reproductive allocation, maximum plant height, chlorophyll fluorescence, and stomatal conductance of A. theophrasti”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1196 · show in text ↑
e1

“combination of BC + SMS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–917 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BC and SMS interacted antagonistically on chlorophyll fluorescence and stomatal conductance in A. theophrasti.

Taxon
A. theophrastiAbutilon theophrastie0
Treatment
BC + SMSe1
Outcome
chlorophyll fluorescence, and stomatal conductancee0
Direction
Antagonistice0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abutilon theophrasti
Abutilon theophrasti · TaxonI.Sáček, senior · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Antagonistic effects were found on maximum leaf area, above- and belowground biomass, reproductive allocation, maximum plant height, chlorophyll fluorescence, and stomatal conductance of A. theophrasti”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1196 · show in text ↑
e1

“combination of BC + SMS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–917 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction of BC and SMS on S. purpurea was mostly neutral.

Taxon
S. purpureaSalix purpureae0
Treatment
BC + SMSe1
Outcome
effect on S. purpureae0
Direction
mostly neutrale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salix purpurea
Salix purpurea · TaxonWillow · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect on S. purpurea was mostly neutral”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1242 · show in text ↑
e1

“combination of BC + SMS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–917 · show in text ↑

growing medium · growth · Abutilon theophrasti (velvetleaf)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.