Paper · 1999 · HortScience

453 N Management Strategies Affect Watermelon Yield and N Leaching

G. Hochmuth; S. Locascio; R. Hochmuth; et al.

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Nitrate concentrations in the springs and rivers in northern Florida have been increasing, and several state agencies are interested in implementing nitrogen management programs on farms to reduce N entering the groundwater. Watermelon was grown in the first season of a six-season project under various cultural and fertilization programs to investigate the relationship of N management with N leaching. Treatments were a factorial arrangement of two cultural systems (polyethylene mulch with drip-irrigated beds and unmulched, overhead irrigated beds) and three N fertilization programs [N at the extension-recommended rate, N at the commercial-watermelon-producer rate (1.5 times recommended), or N at the recommended rate with 50% of N from poultry manure]. Nitrate in the soil beneath the watermelon crop was monitored at the 2-m depth with porous-crop suction lysimeters and soil sampling. Yields were greater with the mulch/drip irrigation system compared with the unmulched/sprinkler cultural system; however, fertilization program had no effect on yield. Nitrate-N concentrations in the soil solution at the 2-m depth with all fertilizer treatments were only slightly elevated (3 to 5 mg·L -1 ) above that in the unfertilized soil (< 1.0 mg·L -1 ) early in the season when no rain fell. Later in the season, soil solution nitrate-N concentrations at the 2-m depth increased to >50 mg·L -1 with the unmulched treatment and with the greater fertilization rate. Polyethylene mulch, drip irrigation, and recommended N rate combined to maintain groundwater nitrate-N concentration below 10 mg·L -1 for most of the production season and only slightly above 10 mg·L -1 during the summer off-season when rainfall was frequent.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Watermelon yield was greater under mulch with drip irrigation than under unmulched overhead irrigation.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Treatment
mulch/drip irrigation systeme1
Outcome
Yieldse1
Direction
greatere1
Comparator
unmulched/sprinkler cultural systeme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Watermelon was grown in the first season of a six-season project”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–289 · show in text ↑
e1

“Yields were greater with the mulch/drip irrigation system compared with the unmulched/sprinkler cultural system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1007 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The N fertilization program had no effect on watermelon yield.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Treatment
fertilization programe2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
no effecte2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Watermelon was grown in the first season of a six-season project”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–289 · show in text ↑
e2

“fertilization program had no effect on yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1062 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil solution nitrate-N at 2 m depth was only slightly elevated, at 3 to 5 mg·L -1, above unfertilized soil early in the season.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Treatment
all fertilizer treatmentse4
Outcome
Nitrate-N concentrations in the soil solution at the 2-m depthe4
Direction
elevatede4
Value
3 to 5 mg·L -1e4
Qualifier
early in the season when no rain felle4
Comparator
unfertilized soile4
Setting
northern Floridae3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Watermelon was grown in the first season of a six-season project”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–289 · show in text ↑
e3

“in northern Florida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 49–68 · show in text ↑
e4

“Nitrate-N concentrations in the soil solution at the 2-m depth with all fertilizer treatments were only slightly elevated (3 to 5 mg·L -1 ) above that in the unfertilized soil (< 1.0 mg·L -1 ) early in the season when no rain fell”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1294 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil solution nitrate-N at 2 m depth rose above 50 mg·L -1 later in the season under the unmulched treatment.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Treatment
unmulched treatmente5
Outcome
soil solution nitrate-N concentrations at the 2-m depthe5
Direction
increasede5
Value
>50 mg·L -1e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Watermelon was grown in the first season of a six-season project”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–289 · show in text ↑
e5

“Later in the season, soil solution nitrate-N concentrations at the 2-m depth increased to >50 mg·L -1 with the unmulched treatment and with the greater fertilization rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1466 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil solution nitrate-N at 2 m depth rose above 50 mg·L -1 later in the season under the greater fertilization rate.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Treatment
greater fertilization ratee5
Outcome
soil solution nitrate-N concentrations at the 2-m depthe5
Direction
increasede5
Value
>50 mg·L -1e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Watermelon was grown in the first season of a six-season project”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–289 · show in text ↑
e5

“Later in the season, soil solution nitrate-N concentrations at the 2-m depth increased to >50 mg·L -1 with the unmulched treatment and with the greater fertilization rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1466 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polyethylene mulch, drip irrigation and the recommended N rate kept groundwater nitrate-N below 10 mg·L -1 for most of the production season.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Treatment
Polyethylene mulch, drip irrigation, and recommended N rate combinede6
Outcome
groundwater nitrate-N concentratione6
Direction
belowe6
Value
10 mg·L -1e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Watermelon was grown in the first season of a six-season project”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–289 · show in text ↑
e6

“Polyethylene mulch, drip irrigation, and recommended N rate combined to maintain groundwater nitrate-N concentration below 10 mg·L -1 for most of the production season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1468–1635 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Groundwater nitrate-N was only slightly above 10 mg·L -1 during the summer off-season under the same combined system.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Outcome
groundwater nitrate-N concentratione6
Value
slightly above 10 mg·L -1e7
Qualifier
summer off-season when rainfall was frequente7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Watermelon was grown in the first season of a six-season project”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–289 · show in text ↑
e6

“Polyethylene mulch, drip irrigation, and recommended N rate combined to maintain groundwater nitrate-N concentration below 10 mg·L -1 for most of the production season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1468–1635 · show in text ↑
e7

“only slightly above 10 mg·L -1 during the summer off-season when rainfall was frequent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1640–1726 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results differ

44 papers: 36 positive, 8 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

fertilization · yield · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results differ

100 papers: 89 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 89 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

96 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 15 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

irrigation · yield · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 31 positive, 9 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

mulching · nutrient: content · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.