Paper · 2016 · Jurnal AgroBiogen

Induksi Kalus dan Optimasi Regenerasi Empat Varietas Padi melalui Kultur In Vitro

Ragapadmi Purnamaningsih

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
45
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A study was conducted at the Tissue Culture Laboratory of ICABIOGRAD, Bogor, to obtain an optimum medium formulation for calli regenerations of for rice varities (Ciherang, Cisadane, IR64, and T-309). The research activities were done in five steps, i.e., callus induction, callus regeneration, shoot multiplication, root formation, and plant acclimatization. The type of explants used in the study was embriozygotic explants. Five media formulations were used for the callus induction, while four media formulations were used for the callus regeneration. The results showed that the best medium formulation for induction of callus formation was MS + 2,4-D 2 mg/l + casein hidrolisat 3 mg/l, while the best medium formulation for callus regeneration was MS + BA 3 mg/l + thidiazuron 0,1 mg/l.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The best medium for callus induction in the four rice varieties was MS + 2,4-D 2 mg/l + casein hidrolisat 3 mg/l.

Material
Ciherang, Cisadane, IR64, and T-309e1
Treatment
MS + 2,4-D 2 mg/l + casein hidrolisat 3 mg/le2
Outcome
callus formatione2
Direction
beste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“calli regenerations of for rice varities (Ciherang, Cisadane, IR64, and T-309)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 121–199 · show in text ↑
e2

“the best medium formulation for induction of callus formation was MS + 2,4-D 2 mg/l + casein hidrolisat 3 mg/l”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–690 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The best medium for callus regeneration in the four rice varieties was MS + BA 3 mg/l + thidiazuron 0,1 mg/l.

Material
Ciherang, Cisadane, IR64, and T-309e1
Treatment
MS + BA 3 mg/l + thidiazuron 0,1 mg/le3
Outcome
callus regeneratione3
Direction
beste3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“calli regenerations of for rice varities (Ciherang, Cisadane, IR64, and T-309)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 121–199 · show in text ↑
e3

“the best medium formulation for callus regeneration was MS + BA 3 mg/l + thidiazuron 0,1 mg/l”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–791 · show in text ↑

N-benzyladenine · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

72 papers: 68 positive, 4 negative or no effect

67 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

68 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

2,4-D · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

107 papers: 102 positive, 5 negative or no effect

101 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

103 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

Thidiazuron · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.