Paper · 2017 · Acta Horticulturae

The fruit as a potential indicator of plant water status in apple

B. Morandi; F. Boselli; A. Boini; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
11
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Different irrigation levels corresponding to 30, 60 and 100% of estimated ETc were applied to a 'Gala' apple orchard from 50 days after full bloom (DAFB) until harvest. Treatments were applied both to trees in full light conditions and under a white 50% shading net. Fruit diameter variations were continuously monitored on 6 trees per treatment from 64 to 112 DAFB, using automatic fruit gauges connected to a wireless data-logger system. During this period, midday stem water potential (Ψstem) was determined weekly. Due to frequent rainfall the irrigation treatments affected tree water status only occasionally. Fruit growth-related parameters such as fruit shrinkage and fruit net daily growth were affected by irrigation and shading treatments mainly during the first period of measurements, when fruit had a higher surface conductance and xylem functionality. Shading and high water availability tended to increase fruit daily growth which was linearly related to midday Ψstem. Later in the season, fruit stopped shrinking during the day, while their daily growth showed a curvilinear relation with midday Ψstem. Due to the small range of Ψstem obtained within the trial, slight or no relationships were found between the other fruit-related parameters (fruit shrinkage; maximum and minimum hourly growth rates) and tree water status. These results suggest how monitoring fruit growth could potentially be used for the early detection of drought stress in decision support systems aimed at optimizing irrigation scheduling.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation treatments affected apple tree water status only occasionally because of frequent rain.

Treatment
irrigation treatmentse0
Outcome
tree water statuse0
Qualifier
Due to frequent rainfalle0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Due to frequent rainfall the irrigation treatments affected tree water status only occasionally”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 519–614 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation affected apple fruit shrinkage and net daily growth mainly early in monitoring.

Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
fruit shrinkage and fruit net daily growthe0
Qualifier
mainly during the first period of measurementse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit growth-related parameters such as fruit shrinkage and fruit net daily growth were affected by irrigation and shading treatments mainly during the first period of measurements”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–796 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading affected apple fruit shrinkage and net daily growth mainly early in monitoring.

Treatment
shading treatmentse0
Outcome
fruit shrinkage and fruit net daily growthe0
Qualifier
mainly during the first period of measurementse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit growth-related parameters such as fruit shrinkage and fruit net daily growth were affected by irrigation and shading treatments mainly during the first period of measurements”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–796 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading tended to increase apple fruit daily growth.

Treatment
Shadinge0
Outcome
fruit daily growthe0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shading and high water availability tended to increase fruit daily growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–940 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High water availability tended to increase apple fruit daily growth.

Treatment
high water availabilitye0
Outcome
fruit daily growthe0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shading and high water availability tended to increase fruit daily growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–940 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple fruit daily growth was linearly related to midday stem water potential early in monitoring.

Outcome
fruit daily growthe0
Comparator
midday Ψsteme0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit daily growth which was linearly related to midday Ψstem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–983 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Later in the season apple fruit stopped shrinking during the day.

Outcome
fruit stopped shrinking during the daye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Later in the season, fruit stopped shrinking during the day”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1044 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Later in the season apple fruit daily growth had a curvilinear relation with midday stem water potential.

Outcome
daily growthe0
Comparator
midday Ψsteme0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“their daily growth showed a curvilinear relation with midday Ψstem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1118 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple fruit shrinkage had slight or no relation to tree water status across the narrow observed water potential range.

Outcome
fruit shrinkagee0
Direction
slight or no relationshipse0
Comparator
tree water statuse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“slight or no relationships were found between the other fruit-related parameters (fruit shrinkage; maximum and minimum hourly growth rates) and tree water status”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1340 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple fruit maximum and minimum hourly growth rates had slight or no relation to tree water status.

Outcome
maximum and minimum hourly growth ratese0
Direction
slight or no relationshipse0
Comparator
tree water statuse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“slight or no relationships were found between the other fruit-related parameters (fruit shrinkage; maximum and minimum hourly growth rates) and tree water status”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1340 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest fruit growth monitoring for early drought detection in irrigation scheduling.

Outcome
monitoring fruit growth could potentially be used for the early detection of drought stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“monitoring fruit growth could potentially be used for the early detection of drought stress in decision support systems aimed at optimizing irrigation scheduling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1368–1529 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑

shade · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

17 papers: 1 positive, 16 negative or no effect

16 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

soil water · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 4 positive, 6 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.