Abstract
During 1995 and 1996, yield and quality of `Banaty' grapes in response to spraying chelated iron and zinc singly or in combination each at 0.025%, 0.05%, 0.1%, 0.2%, or 0.3% was investigated. Each concentration was applied once, twice, three, four, or five times. Results showed that there was a gradual increase in berry set, cluster number, yield, cluster weight, berry weight, total soluble solid sugars, and total anthocyanins with rising concentrations and number of sprays of each fertilizer. Total acidity tended to reduce with such treatment. Combined spray of both fertilizers, particularly at 0.1% four times, gave satisfactory improvement in both quantity and quality of grapes. Spraying at concentrations higher than 0.1% or spraying more than four times failed to show any measurable effect on all of the studied traits. The best results with regard to yield and quality of `Banaty' grapes were obtained on vines that received four sprays of iron and zinc each at 0.1% in chelated form.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Spraying chelated iron and zinc at rising concentrations and spray numbers increased grape berry set, cluster number and yield.
- Taxon
- grapese0
- Material
- Banatye0
- Treatment
- spraying chelated iron and zince0
- Outcome
- berry set, cluster number, yielde1
- Direction
- increasee1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“yield and quality of `Banaty' grapes in response to spraying chelated iron and zinc singly or in combination”
e1“there was a gradual increase in berry set, cluster number, yield, cluster weight, berry weight, total soluble solid sugars, and total anthocyanins with rising concentrations and number of sprays of each fertilizer”
Claim · model-written summary
Spraying chelated iron and zinc at rising concentrations and spray numbers increased grape cluster weight and berry weight.
- Taxon
- grapese0
- Material
- Banatye0
- Treatment
- spraying chelated iron and zince0
- Outcome
- cluster weight, berry weighte1
- Direction
- increasee1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“yield and quality of `Banaty' grapes in response to spraying chelated iron and zinc singly or in combination”
e1“there was a gradual increase in berry set, cluster number, yield, cluster weight, berry weight, total soluble solid sugars, and total anthocyanins with rising concentrations and number of sprays of each fertilizer”
Claim · model-written summary
Spraying chelated iron and zinc at rising concentrations and spray numbers increased grape total soluble solid sugars and total anthocyanins.
- Taxon
- grapese0
- Material
- Banatye0
- Treatment
- spraying chelated iron and zince0
- Outcome
- total soluble solid sugars, and total anthocyaninse1
- Direction
- increasee1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“yield and quality of `Banaty' grapes in response to spraying chelated iron and zinc singly or in combination”
e1“there was a gradual increase in berry set, cluster number, yield, cluster weight, berry weight, total soluble solid sugars, and total anthocyanins with rising concentrations and number of sprays of each fertilizer”
Claim · model-written summary
Spraying chelated iron and zinc tended to reduce total acidity of grapes.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“yield and quality of `Banaty' grapes in response to spraying chelated iron and zinc singly or in combination”
e2“Total acidity tended to reduce with such treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined spray of both fertilizers, particularly at 0.1% four times, gave satisfactory improvement in quantity and quality of grapes.
- Taxon
- grapese3
- Treatment
- Combined spray of both fertilizers, particularly at 0.1% four timese3
- Outcome
- quantity and quality of grapese3
- Direction
- satisfactory improvemente3
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e3“Combined spray of both fertilizers, particularly at 0.1% four times, gave satisfactory improvement in both quantity and quality of grapes”
Claim · model-written summary
Spraying at concentrations higher than 0.1% or more than four times had no measurable effect on any studied grape trait.
- Taxon
- grapese0
- Treatment
- concentrations higher than 0.1% or spraying more than four timese4
- Outcome
- all of the studied traitse4
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede4
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“yield and quality of `Banaty' grapes in response to spraying chelated iron and zinc singly or in combination”
e4“Spraying at concentrations higher than 0.1% or spraying more than four times failed to show any measurable effect on all of the studied traits”
Claim · model-written summary
Four sprays of iron and zinc each at 0.1% in chelated form gave the best results for yield and quality of Banaty grapes.
- Taxon
- grapese5
- Material
- Banatye5
- Treatment
- four sprays of iron and zinc each at 0.1% in chelated forme5
- Outcome
- yield and qualitye5
- Direction
- best resultse5
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e5“The best results with regard to yield and quality of `Banaty' grapes were obtained on vines that received four sprays of iron and zinc each at 0.1% in chelated form”
The same questions in other papers
iron atom · quality: phytochemicals · VitisPositive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →zinc atom · quality: general · VitisResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
iron atom · quality: general · VitisResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
zinc atom · quality: phytochemicals · VitisResults agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
iron atom · yield · VitisResults agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →zinc atom · yield · VitisResults agree
7 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →application · quality: phytochemicals · VitisPositive and negative results
21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
20 papers more in this group
See all 24 papers →application · quality: general · VitisPositive and negative results
25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
28 papers more in this group
See all 32 papers →8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.