Paper · 2005 · HortScience

(34) Maintaining the Analytical and Microbial Quality of Fresh-cut Apple Slices using Hot Water Pretreatment and a Low pH Dip Treatment

Robert Saftner; Judith Abbott; Arvind Bhagwat

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A calcium ascorbate processing formulation is commercially used to prevent browning on fresh-cut apple slices but has little to no antimicrobial activity. Intact apples were surface-sanitized with chlorine water at 20 °C or water at 60 °C, processed into fresh-cut slices, and the slices dipped in a calcium ascorbate formulation or a solution of isoascorbic acid, calcium, and N -acetylcysteine at pH 2.0. The commercial and experimental dip treatments similarly maintained cut surface color, Kramer firmness, and aromatic volatile concentrations during 3 weeks of storage at 5 °C in air. Freshly prepared experimental dip treatment reduced the native bacterial population of the apple slices prepared from sanitized apples better than the calcium ascorbate treatment. With repeated use, the experimental dip solution became adulterated with apple tissue and juice and rapidly lost its antibacterial activity. Concomitantly the pH of the dip solution increased to 2.6 or higher. The lost antibacterial activity could be restored in highly contaminated experimental dip solutions by back titrating to pH 2.0. The experimental dip treatment also reduced the overall yeast and mold population, but specifically enhanced growth of Penicilliumexpansum on slices prepared from chlorine-sanitized apples. A hot water pretreatment of intact apples at 60 °C for 3 min prior to fresh-cut processing essentially eliminated P. expansum contamination on the slices. The results indicate that the experimental dip treatment is a promising alternative to calcium ascorbate treatment for analytical and microbial quality retention of fresh-cut apple slices during storage, especially when the apple slices are processed from hot water-treated apples.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The experimental and commercial dips similarly maintained slice color, firmness and aromatic volatiles during storage.

Treatment
experimental dip treatmentse0
Outcome
cut surface color, Kramer firmness, and aromatic volatile concentrationse0
Direction
similarly maintainede0
Qualifier
during 3 weeks of storage at 5 °C in aire0
Comparator
commerciale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The commercial and experimental dip treatments similarly maintained cut surface color, Kramer firmness, and aromatic volatile concentrations during 3 weeks of storage at 5 °C in air.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–589 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Slices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fresh experimental dip reduced native bacteria better than calcium ascorbate.

Treatment
experimental dip treatmente0
Outcome
native bacterial populatione0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
calcium ascorbate treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Freshly prepared experimental dip treatment reduced the native bacterial population of the apple slices prepared from sanitized apples better than the calcium ascorbate treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–769 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeated use caused the experimental dip to lose antibacterial activity as its pH rose.

Treatment
repeated usee0
Outcome
antibacterial activitye0
Direction
loste0
Value
2.6 or highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With repeated use, the experimental dip solution became adulterated with apple tissue and juice and rapidly lost its antibacterial activity. Concomitantly the pH of the dip solution increased to 2.6 or higher.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Slices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Back titration to pH 2.0 restored antibacterial activity in contaminated dip.

Treatment
back titrating to pH 2.0e0
Outcome
antibacterial activitye0
Direction
restorede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lost antibacterial activity could be restored in highly contaminated experimental dip solutions by back titrating to pH 2.0.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1108 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Slices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Experimental dip reduced yeast and mold populations.

Treatment
experimental dip treatmente0
Outcome
overall yeast and mold populatione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The experimental dip treatment also reduced the overall yeast and mold population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1190 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Slices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Experimental dip enhanced Penicilliumexpansum growth on slices from chlorine sanitized apples.

Interactor
Penicilliumexpansume0pathogen
Outcome
growth of Penicilliumexpansume0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“specifically enhanced growth of Penicilliumexpansum on slices prepared from chlorine-sanitized apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1297 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Slices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hot water pretreatment essentially eliminated P. expansum contamination.

Treatment
hot water pretreatment of intact apples at 60 °C for 3 mine0
Interactor
P. expansume0pathogen
Outcome
P. expansum contaminatione0
Direction
essentially eliminatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A hot water pretreatment of intact apples at 60 °C for 3 min prior to fresh-cut processing essentially eliminated P. expansum contamination on the slices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1453 · show in text ↑

ph · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.