Paper · 1966 · American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Decay Control and Chemical Injury of Table Grapes Packed in Export Chests

K. E. Nelson; J. P. Gentry

10
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

9Cardinal9, 9Queen9 and 9Emperor9 grapes were used in export chests to determine the relation of sawdust moisture content, distribution of NaHSO3 in sawdust, distribution of dibromotetrachloroethane (DBTCE) in sawdust, and DBTCE-impregnated pads to the spread of Botrytis decay and incidence of bleaching injury of the fruit. Moisture content was directly related to decay and bleaching. Mixing of either fungistat with sawdust just prior to application to the fruit reduced overall decay and bleaching compared to top-application to the sawdust-filled chest. Vibration was not effective in distributing top-applied NaHSO3 to the bottom of the pack, but did have some effect in distributing DBTCE. Top and bottom pads impregnated with DBTCE controlled decay to some extent in sawdust-packed grapes, but were significantly poorer than either NaHSO3 or DBTCE powder mixed with the sawdust. DBTCE was superior to NaHSO3 as a fungistat with respect to longevity of effectiveness and non-injury to the fruit, its pungency and lachrymatory effect made it disagreeable to handle. It was emphasized that DBTCE could not be recommended for use since the chemical has not been cleared by the Federal Food and Drug Administration for use on grapes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher sawdust moisture was directly related to grape decay.

Taxon
grapese1
Treatment
Moisture contente0
Outcome
decaye0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Moisture content was directly related to decay and bleaching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 326–386 · show in text ↑
e1

“grapes were used in export chests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–67 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher sawdust moisture was directly related to bleaching.

Taxon
grapese1
Treatment
Moisture contente0
Outcome
bleachinge0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Moisture content was directly related to decay and bleaching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 326–386 · show in text ↑
e1

“grapes were used in export chests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixing either fungistat into sawdust before fruit application reduced decay compared with top application.

Taxon
grapese1
Treatment
Mixing of either fungistat with sawduste0
Outcome
decaye0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
top-application to the sawdust-filled cheste0

Verbatim

e0

“Mixing of either fungistat with sawdust just prior to application to the fruit reduced overall decay and bleaching compared to top-application to the sawdust-filled chest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–558 · show in text ↑
e1

“grapes were used in export chests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixing either fungistat into sawdust before fruit application reduced bleaching compared with top application.

Taxon
grapese1
Treatment
Mixing of either fungistat with sawduste0
Outcome
bleachinge0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
top-application to the sawdust-filled cheste0

Verbatim

e0

“Mixing of either fungistat with sawdust just prior to application to the fruit reduced overall decay and bleaching compared to top-application to the sawdust-filled chest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–558 · show in text ↑
e1

“grapes were used in export chests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vibration did not distribute top-applied NaHSO3 to the bottom of the pack.

Taxon
grapese1
Treatment
Vibratione0
Outcome
distributing top-applied NaHSO3 to the bottom of the packe0
Direction
not effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Vibration was not effective in distributing top-applied NaHSO3 to the bottom of the pack”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–648 · show in text ↑
e1

“grapes were used in export chests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vibration had some effect on DBTCE distribution.

Taxon
grapese1
Outcome
distributing DBTCEe0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“but did have some effect in distributing DBTCE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–696 · show in text ↑
e1

“grapes were used in export chests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

DBTCE pads controlled some decay but performed significantly worse than powders mixed into sawdust.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
Top and bottom pads impregnated with DBTCEe0
Outcome
decaye0
Direction
poorere0
Comparator
either NaHSO3 or DBTCE powder mixed with the sawduste0

Verbatim

e0

“Top and bottom pads impregnated with DBTCE controlled decay to some extent in sawdust-packed grapes, but were significantly poorer than either NaHSO3 or DBTCE powder mixed with the sawdust”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–886 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DBTCE had longer effective life than NaHSO3.

Taxon
grapese1
Treatment
DBTCEe0
Outcome
longevity of effectivenesse0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
NaHSO3e0

Verbatim

e0

“DBTCE was superior to NaHSO3 as a fungistat with respect to longevity of effectiveness and non-injury to the fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1002 · show in text ↑
e1

“grapes were used in export chests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DBTCE caused less fruit injury than NaHSO3.

Taxon
grapese1
Treatment
DBTCEe0
Outcome
non-injury to the fruite0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
NaHSO3e0

Verbatim

e0

“DBTCE was superior to NaHSO3 as a fungistat with respect to longevity of effectiveness and non-injury to the fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1002 · show in text ↑
e1

“grapes were used in export chests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–67 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors advised against using DBTCE on grapes because it lacked regulatory clearance.

Taxon
grapese0
Outcome
DBTCE could not be recommended for usee0
Qualifier
has not been cleared by the Federal Food and Drug Administratione0

Verbatim

e0

“DBTCE could not be recommended for use since the chemical has not been cleared by the Federal Food and Drug Administration for use on grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1236 · show in text ↑

growing medium · crop injury · VitisPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

growing medium · disease · VitisResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.