Paper · 2017 · Phytopathology

Agrobacteria Enhance Plant Defense Against Root-Knot Nematodes on Tomato

Janja Lamovšek; Barbara Gerič Stare; Irena Mavrič Pleško; et al.

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
10
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The increased incidence of the crown gall disease caused by Agrobacterium tumefaciens has long been associated with activities of root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.). Pot experiments on tomato were designed to assess plant vitality, nematode reproduction, and crown gall incidence in combined infection with Agrobacterium and Meloidogyne spp. on tomato roots. Results suggest that tomato plants infected with pathogenic A. tumefaciens 2 days before the nematodes show enhanced plant defense against M. ethiopica resulting in lower egg and gall counts on roots 45 and 90 days postinoculation (dpi); no significantly enhanced defense was observed when the plant was inoculated with bacteria and nematodes at the same time. Split-root experiments also showed that the observed interaction was systemic. Reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis that targeted several genes under plant hormonal control suggests that the suppression was mediated via systemic acquired resistance by the pathogenesis-related protein 1 and that M. ethiopica did not enhance the defense reaction of tomato against Agrobacterium spp. Nematodes completely inhibited tumor growth in a 45-day experiment if inoculated onto the roots before the pathogenic bacteria. We conclude that the observed antagonism in the tested pathosystem was the result of initially strong plant defense that was later suppressed by the invading pathogen and pest.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato plants infected with A. tumefaciens 2 days before the nematodes had lower M. ethiopica egg and gall counts on roots 45 and 90 days after inoculation.

Treatment
pathogenic A. tumefaciens 2 days before the nematodese0
Interactor
M. ethiopicaMeloidogyne ethiopicae0pest
Second interactor
A. tumefaciensAgrobacterium tumefaciense0pathogen
Outcome
egg and gall countse0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
45 and 90 days postinoculatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Agrobacterium tumefaciens
Agrobacterium tumefaciens · Second interactorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato plants infected with pathogenic A. tumefaciens 2 days before the nematodes show enhanced plant defense against M. ethiopica resulting in lower egg and gall counts on roots 45 and 90 days postinoculation (dpi)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–599 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato inoculated with bacteria and nematodes at the same time showed no significantly enhanced defense.

Treatment
bacteria and nematodes at the same timee1
Interactor
nematodesNematodae1pest
Outcome
enhanced defensee1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato plants infected with pathogenic A. tumefaciens 2 days before the nematodes show enhanced plant defense against M. ethiopica resulting in lower egg and gall counts on roots 45 and 90 days postinoculation (dpi)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–599 · show in text ↑
e1

“no significantly enhanced defense was observed when the plant was inoculated with bacteria and nematodes at the same time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–722 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The observed interaction between the pathogen and nematodes was systemic in split-root experiments.

Outcome
observed interaction was systemice2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato plants infected with pathogenic A. tumefaciens 2 days before the nematodes show enhanced plant defense against M. ethiopica resulting in lower egg and gall counts on roots 45 and 90 days postinoculation (dpi)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–599 · show in text ↑
e2

“Split-root experiments also showed that the observed interaction was systemic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–801 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M. ethiopica did not enhance tomato defense against Agrobacterium spp.

Treatment
M. ethiopicae5
Interactor
Agrobacterium spp.Agrobacteriume5pathogen
Second interactor
M. ethiopicaMeloidogyne ethiopicae5pest
Outcome
defense reactione5
Direction
no_changeinferrede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Agrobacterium
Agrobacterium · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDidierFy · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“M. ethiopica did not enhance the defense reaction of tomato against Agrobacterium spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematodes inhibited tumor growth in a 45-day experiment when inoculated onto roots before the pathogenic bacteria.

Treatment
inoculated onto the roots before the pathogenic bacteriae3
Interactor
pathogenic bacteriae3pathogen
Second interactor
NematodesNematodae3pest
Outcome
tumor growthe3
Direction
inhibitede3
Qualifier
in a 45-day experimente3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato plants infected with pathogenic A. tumefaciens 2 days before the nematodes show enhanced plant defense against M. ethiopica resulting in lower egg and gall counts on roots 45 and 90 days postinoculation (dpi)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–599 · show in text ↑
e3

“Nematodes completely inhibited tumor growth in a 45-day experiment if inoculated onto the roots before the pathogenic bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1266 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Systemic acquired resistance mediated by pathogenesis-related protein 1 is suggested to underlie the suppression of defense.

Gene
pathogenesis-related protein 1e4
Outcome
the suppressione4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato plants infected with pathogenic A. tumefaciens 2 days before the nematodes show enhanced plant defense against M. ethiopica resulting in lower egg and gall counts on roots 45 and 90 days postinoculation (dpi)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–599 · show in text ↑
e4

“the suppression was mediated via systemic acquired resistance by the pathogenesis-related protein 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1043 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Observed antagonism is concluded to result from initially strong plant defense later suppressed by the invading pathogen and pest.

Outcome
observed antagonisme6
Qualifier
initially strong plant defense that was later suppressed by the invading pathogen and peste6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato plants infected with pathogenic A. tumefaciens 2 days before the nematodes show enhanced plant defense against M. ethiopica resulting in lower egg and gall counts on roots 45 and 90 days postinoculation (dpi)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–599 · show in text ↑
e6

“We conclude that the observed antagonism in the tested pathosystem was the result of initially strong plant defense that was later suppressed by the invading pathogen and pest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1443 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Nematoda · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 19 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

inoculation · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

441 papers: 387 positive, 54 negative or no effect

386 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

437 papers more in this group

See all 441 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.