Paper · 1970 · Weed Science

An Implanted Soil Mass Technique to Study Herbicide Effects on Root Growth

Zane F. Lund; R. W. Pearson; Gale A. Buchanan

5
claims
6
verbatim quotes
45
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An implanted soil mass technique was modified to study the effect of soil-incorporated herbicides on root growth. The technique was used to study the effects of α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro- N,N -dipropyl- p -toluidine (trifluralin) and 4-(methylsulfonyl)-2,6-dinitro- N,N -dipropylaniline (nitralin) on root growth of cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L., var. Auburn 56) and the effects of trifluralin and S -propyl dipropylthiocarbamate (vernolate) on soybeans ( Glycine max (L.) Merr., var. Bragg). Vernolate had no effect, but there was only 57% as much soybean root tissue in the soil receiving 1 ppm of trifluralin as there was in the untreated check 2 months after initiating the treatments. Trifluralin and nitralin at 1 ppm reduced cotton roots to 75% and 50%, respectively, of that of the untreated check. The effects of trifluralin and low soil pH were additive, but there was no interaction between them.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vernolate had no effect on soybean roots.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
Vernolatee0
Outcome
soybean root tissuee0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vernolate had no effect, but there was only 57% as much soybean root tissue in the soil receiving 1 ppm of trifluralin as there was in the untreated check 2 months after initiating the treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–692 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 1 ppm, trifluralin left 57% as much soybean root tissue as the untreated check.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
1 ppm of trifluraline0
Outcome
soybean root tissuee0
Direction
onlye0
Value
57%e0
Qualifier
2 months after initiating the treatmentse0
Comparator
untreated checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vernolate had no effect, but there was only 57% as much soybean root tissue in the soil receiving 1 ppm of trifluralin as there was in the untreated check 2 months after initiating the treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–692 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trifluralin at 1 ppm reduced cotton roots to 75% of untreated controls.

Treatment
Trifluralin and nitralin at 1 ppme0
Outcome
cotton rootse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
75%e0
Comparator
untreated checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trifluralin and nitralin at 1 ppm reduced cotton roots to 75% and 50%, respectively, of that of the untreated check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–809 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitralin at 1 ppm reduced cotton roots to 50% of untreated controls.

Treatment
nitralin at 1 ppme0
Outcome
cotton rootse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
50%e0
Comparator
untreated checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trifluralin and nitralin at 1 ppm reduced cotton roots to 75% and 50%, respectively, of that of the untreated check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–809 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trifluralin and low soil pH had additive effects, without interaction.

Treatment
trifluralin and low soil pHe0
Outcome
effects of trifluralin and low soil pH were additivee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of trifluralin and low soil pH were additive, but there was no interaction between them.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–910 · show in text ↑
t0

“root growth of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 303–324 · show in text ↑

vernolate · organism · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

trifluralin · organism · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

trifluralin · organism · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.