Paper · 1995 · HortScience

THE EFFECT OF FIVE PREPLANT TREATMENTS ON THE EARLY PERFORMANCE OF PEACH ON A REPLANT SITE

Curt R. Rom; B. Blackburn; R. Bourne

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The growth and productivity of `Redhaven'/Lovell peach during the first 3 years in a replant site was evaluated after planting in one of five preplant treatments. Treatments (trt) were 1) nontreated control (CK), 2) killed fescue (F), 3) soybean rotation (L), 4) summer solarization (SOL), and 5) methyl bromide fumigation (FUM). An orchard was removed from the experimental site in Spring 1991 before establishments of treatments. In June 1991, a tall fescue (K-31), soybeans, or mustard, and cabbage were sown in trt plots 2, 3, and 4, respectively. In July, trt 4 was covered with clear, 4-mil plastic sheeting for 90 days. In October, trt 5 was fumigated with methyl bromide under a 4-mil plastic sheet. Trees were planted in Spring 1992. Soil characteristics, weed populations, and tree growth and productivity were measured in the first three seasons after planting. FUM significantly reduced weed density into the third season. SOL plots had the highest weed density in years 2 and 3. TCSA, yield, and yield efficiency of FUM trees were significantly larger than CK. Trees in F or SOL had significantly lower yields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Methyl bromide fumigation significantly reduced weed density into the third season.

Treatment
FUMe1
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
weed densitye1
Direction
reducede1
Qualifier
into the third seasone1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and productivity of `Redhaven'/Lovell peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4–54 · show in text ↑
e1

“FUM significantly reduced weed density into the third season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–933 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Summer solarization plots had the highest weed density in years 2 and 3.

Treatment
SOLe2
Interactor
weede2weed
Outcome
weed densitye2
Direction
higheste2
Qualifier
in years 2 and 3e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and productivity of `Redhaven'/Lovell peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4–54 · show in text ↑
e2

“SOL plots had the highest weed density in years 2 and 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–990 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Methyl bromide fumigated trees had significantly larger trunk cross-sectional area, yield and yield efficiency than the control.

Treatment
FUMe3
Outcome
TCSA, yield, and yield efficiencye3
Direction
largere3
Comparator
CKe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and productivity of `Redhaven'/Lovell peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4–54 · show in text ↑
e3

“TCSA, yield, and yield efficiency of FUM trees were significantly larger than CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1072 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Trees in killed fescue or summer solarization plots had significantly lower yields.

Treatment
F or SOLe4
Outcome
yieldse4
Direction
lowere4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and productivity of `Redhaven'/Lovell peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4–54 · show in text ↑
e4

“Trees in F or SOL had significantly lower yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1122 · show in text ↑

solarization · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.