Paper · 2014 · Vegetable Science

Field efficacy of systemic insecticides and microbial pesticides against aphid and fruit borer on tomato in Punjab

Sandeep Kaur; Subash Singh

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Studies were carried out to evaluate the field efficacy of some systemic insecticides and microbial pesticides modules against cotton aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover and tomato fruit borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on tomato (Lycopersicon esculenum Mill.) at the Vegetable Research Farm, PunjabAgricultural University, Ludhiana. Theneed based sprays of different modules i.e., Imidacloprid (Confidor)17.8 SL@ 0.3 ml L−1 in moduleM1, Thiomethoxam (Actara) 25 WG@ 0.4 g L−1 in module M2, Verticillium lecanii (Ecocill)@2.5 kgha−1+Econeem(AzEC) 1%@500 mlha−1inmoduleM3, Profenophos(Carina)50EC@2mlL−1 in moduleM4, Acephate(Asataf)75SP@1.0 gL−1 in module M5 against M6 standard check Malathion 50 EC@1Lha−1 and control (M7) at 10 days interval for aphid, while Spinosad 45% SC @0.5 ml L−1 in module M1 and Profenophos(Carina) 50 EC @1.5Lha−1in moduleM5 at15 days interval, and Bt (Delfin WG) @500gha−1in moduleM2 and Beauveria bassiana (Larvocel) @4g L−1 in moduleM3, NucleoPolyhedroVirus(NPV)@350 LEha−1 in moduleM4 at 10 days interval were evaluated for fruit borer and compared with the standard check (M6) i.e., Profenophos (Carina) 50EC@ 1.5Lha−1and theuntreatedcontrol(M7)at 10 days interval. The pooled data of 3 years revealed that thiamethoxam (Actara) 25 WG and imidacloprid 17.8 SL significantly reduced aphid population (109.99–123.08 aphids/15 leaves) as against other modules (141.85–208.31 aphids/15 leaves), standard check Malathion 50 EC (175.82 aphids/15 leaves) and control (247.75 aphids/15 leaves). Whereas, spinosad 45% SC in module M1 significantly resulted in lower fruit borer infestation (9.68%) than other modules (M2-M5) with 13.73–29.00% fruit infestation, standard check M6 (13.87%) and control M7 (32.66%). Highest marketable fruit yield and economic returns were obtainedin moduleM1viz.imidacloprid17.8 SL+Spinosad 45%SC(259.06qha−1 and Rs.136717/-)over theother modules (86.97–184.41q ha−1and Rs.14535–88094/-, resp.), the standard check module: Malathion 50EC and Profenophos 50EC(149.12 qha−1andRs.62140/-)andcontrol moduleM7

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam and imidacloprid significantly reduced aphid population on tomato to 109.99-123.08 aphids/15 leaves versus 247.75 in the untreated control.

Treatment
thiamethoxam (Actara) 25 WG and imidacloprid 17.8 SLe1
Interactor
aphide1pest
Outcome
aphid populatione1
Direction
reducede1
Value
109.99–123.08 aphids/15 leavese1
Qualifier
247.75 aphids/15 leavese1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–104 · show in text ↑
e1

“thiamethoxam (Actara) 25 WG and imidacloprid 17.8 SL significantly reduced aphid population (109.99–123.08 aphids/15 leaves) as against other modules (141.85–208.31 aphids/15 leaves), standard check Malathion 50 EC (175.82 aphids/15 leaves) and control (247.75 aphids/15 leaves)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1516 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam and imidacloprid significantly reduced aphid population on tomato to 109.99-123.08 aphids/15 leaves versus 175.82 under the standard check Malathion 50 EC.

Treatment
thiamethoxam (Actara) 25 WG and imidacloprid 17.8 SLe1
Interactor
aphide1pest
Outcome
aphid populatione1
Direction
reducede1
Value
109.99–123.08 aphids/15 leavese1
Qualifier
175.82 aphids/15 leavese1
Comparator
standard check Malathion 50 ECe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–104 · show in text ↑
e1

“thiamethoxam (Actara) 25 WG and imidacloprid 17.8 SL significantly reduced aphid population (109.99–123.08 aphids/15 leaves) as against other modules (141.85–208.31 aphids/15 leaves), standard check Malathion 50 EC (175.82 aphids/15 leaves) and control (247.75 aphids/15 leaves)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1516 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam and imidacloprid significantly reduced aphid population on tomato to 109.99-123.08 aphids/15 leaves versus 141.85-208.31 in the other modules.

Treatment
thiamethoxam (Actara) 25 WG and imidacloprid 17.8 SLe1
Interactor
aphide1pest
Outcome
aphid populatione1
Direction
reducede1
Value
109.99–123.08 aphids/15 leavese1
Qualifier
141.85–208.31 aphids/15 leavese1
Comparator
other modulese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–104 · show in text ↑
e1

“thiamethoxam (Actara) 25 WG and imidacloprid 17.8 SL significantly reduced aphid population (109.99–123.08 aphids/15 leaves) as against other modules (141.85–208.31 aphids/15 leaves), standard check Malathion 50 EC (175.82 aphids/15 leaves) and control (247.75 aphids/15 leaves)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1516 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad in module M1 significantly lowered tomato fruit borer infestation to 9.68% versus 32.66% in the control M7.

Treatment
spinosad 45% SC in module M1e1
Interactor
fruit borere1pest
Outcome
fruit borer infestatione1
Direction
lowere1
Value
9.68%e1
Qualifier
32.66%e1
Comparator
control M7e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–104 · show in text ↑
e1

“spinosad 45% SC in module M1 significantly resulted in lower fruit borer infestation (9.68%) than other modules (M2-M5) with 13.73–29.00% fruit infestation, standard check M6 (13.87%) and control M7 (32.66%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1527–1734 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad in module M1 significantly lowered tomato fruit borer infestation to 9.68% versus 13.87% in the standard check M6.

Treatment
spinosad 45% SC in module M1e1
Interactor
fruit borere1pest
Outcome
fruit borer infestatione1
Direction
lowere1
Value
9.68%e1
Qualifier
13.87%e1
Comparator
standard check M6e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–104 · show in text ↑
e1

“spinosad 45% SC in module M1 significantly resulted in lower fruit borer infestation (9.68%) than other modules (M2-M5) with 13.73–29.00% fruit infestation, standard check M6 (13.87%) and control M7 (32.66%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1527–1734 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad in module M1 significantly lowered tomato fruit borer infestation to 9.68% versus 13.73-29.00% in modules M2-M5.

Treatment
spinosad 45% SC in module M1e1
Interactor
fruit borere1pest
Outcome
fruit borer infestatione1
Direction
lowere1
Value
9.68%e1
Qualifier
13.73–29.00%e1
Comparator
other modules (M2-M5)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–104 · show in text ↑
e1

“spinosad 45% SC in module M1 significantly resulted in lower fruit borer infestation (9.68%) than other modules (M2-M5) with 13.73–29.00% fruit infestation, standard check M6 (13.87%) and control M7 (32.66%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1527–1734 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Module M1 (imidacloprid plus spinosad) gave the highest marketable tomato fruit yield, 259.06 q/ha, over the other modules.

Treatment
imidacloprid17.8 SL+Spinosad 45%SCe1
Outcome
marketable fruit yielde1
Direction
Higheste1
Value
259.06qha−1e1
Comparator
other modulese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–104 · show in text ↑
e1

“Highest marketable fruit yield and economic returns were obtainedin moduleM1viz.imidacloprid17.8 SL+Spinosad 45%SC(259.06qha−1 and Rs.136717/-)over theother modules”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1736–1900 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Module M1 (imidacloprid plus spinosad) gave the highest economic returns on tomato, Rs.136717, over the other modules.

Treatment
imidacloprid17.8 SL+Spinosad 45%SCe1
Outcome
economic returnse1
Direction
Higheste1
Value
Rs.136717/-e1
Comparator
other modulese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–104 · show in text ↑
e1

“Highest marketable fruit yield and economic returns were obtainedin moduleM1viz.imidacloprid17.8 SL+Spinosad 45%SC(259.06qha−1 and Rs.136717/-)over theother modules”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1736–1900 · show in text ↑

thiamethoxam · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

spinosad · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 17 positive, 3 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

imidacloprid · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.