Paper · 2004 · HortScience

Suppression of Ethylene Responsiveness Prolongs Cucumber Fruit Shelf Life in the Presence and Absence of Exogenously Applied Ethylene

Luiz Lima; Brandon Hurr; Donald Huber

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Ethylene induces postharvest problems in many fruits, including members of the Cucurbitaceae. The effects of ethylene and its antagonist 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) were studied on cucumber fruit, a cucurbit harvested immature. Beit Alpha cucumbers (cv. Manar) were harvested and exposed to 0.5 or 1.0 μL·L -1 1-MCP prior to exposure to ethylene at 10 μL·L -1 at 15 °C. Fruit exposed to ethylene exhibited significant quality loss upon exposure to ethylene, including epidermal yellowing, a 40% reduction in firmness and, following longer exposure (6 d), epidermal sloughing and placental watersoaking. After 8 d, cucumbers exhibited a 75% reduction in firmness and acute pathogen incidence. Control fruit (no ethylene, no 1-MCP) were visually acceptable but firmness had declined 30% compared with initial values. Fruit exposed to 1-MCP were resistant to applied ethylene, with firmness declining 10 (1.0 μL·L -1 1-MCP) to 20% (0.5 μL·L -1 ) during storage for 14 d at 15 °C. Firmness of fruit treated with 1-MCP at 1.0 μL·L -1 was 28% higher than controls receiving only air, suggesting that ethylene production contributes to softening of cucumber during storage. The softening and watersoaking of fruit treated with ethylene was accompanied by downshifts in pectin mol mass. Fruit exposed to 1-MCP showed significantly reduced mol mass downshifts. The data indicate that cucumber show a PCD response to ethylene that is largely prevented by suppression of ethylene perception. The response of cucumber to ethylene parallels that for other cucurbits, and provides additional information that the benefits of 1-MCP extend beyond application to climacteric fruits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethylene exposure reduced cucumber fruit firmness by 40%.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
ethylenee1
Outcome
firmnesse1
Direction
reductione1
Value
40%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Prolongs Cucumber Fruit Shelf Life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fruit exposed to ethylene exhibited significant quality loss upon exposure to ethylene, including epidermal yellowing, a 40% reduction in firmness and, following longer exposure (6 d), epidermal sloughing and placental watersoaking”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 371–602 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethylene exposure caused epidermal yellowing in cucumber fruit.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
ethylenee1
Outcome
epidermal yellowinge1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Prolongs Cucumber Fruit Shelf Life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fruit exposed to ethylene exhibited significant quality loss upon exposure to ethylene, including epidermal yellowing, a 40% reduction in firmness and, following longer exposure (6 d), epidermal sloughing and placental watersoaking”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 371–602 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After longer ethylene exposure (6 d), cucumber fruit showed epidermal sloughing and placental watersoaking.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
ethylenee1
Outcome
epidermal sloughing and placental watersoakinge1
Qualifier
following longer exposure (6 d)e1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Prolongs Cucumber Fruit Shelf Life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fruit exposed to ethylene exhibited significant quality loss upon exposure to ethylene, including epidermal yellowing, a 40% reduction in firmness and, following longer exposure (6 d), epidermal sloughing and placental watersoaking”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 371–602 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 8 d, cucumbers showed a 75% reduction in firmness.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Outcome
firmnesse3
Direction
reductione3
Value
75%e3
Qualifier
After 8 de3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Prolongs Cucumber Fruit Shelf Life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–73 · show in text ↑
e3

“After 8 d, cucumbers exhibited a 75% reduction in firmness and acute pathogen incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–691 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 8 d, cucumbers showed acute pathogen incidence.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Outcome
acute pathogen incidencee3
Qualifier
After 8 de3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Prolongs Cucumber Fruit Shelf Life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–73 · show in text ↑
e3

“After 8 d, cucumbers exhibited a 75% reduction in firmness and acute pathogen incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–691 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control fruit without ethylene or 1-MCP lost 30% firmness compared with initial values.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Outcome
firmnesse4
Direction
declinede4
Value
30%e4
Qualifier
no ethylene, no 1-MCPe4
Comparator
initial valuese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Prolongs Cucumber Fruit Shelf Life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–73 · show in text ↑
e4

“Control fruit (no ethylene, no 1-MCP) were visually acceptable but firmness had declined 30% compared with initial values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit treated with 1.0 μL·L -1 1-MCP showed a 10% firmness decline during storage, against ethylene exposure.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
1.0 μL·L -1 1-MCPe5
Outcome
firmnesse5
Direction
declininge5
Value
10e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Prolongs Cucumber Fruit Shelf Life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–73 · show in text ↑
e5

“Fruit exposed to 1-MCP were resistant to applied ethylene, with firmness declining 10 (1.0 μL·L -1 1-MCP) to 20% (0.5 μL·L -1 ) during storage for 14 d at 15 °C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–976 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit treated with 0.5 μL·L -1 1-MCP showed a 20% firmness decline during storage.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
0.5 μL·L -1e5
Outcome
firmnesse5
Direction
declininge5
Value
20%e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Prolongs Cucumber Fruit Shelf Life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–73 · show in text ↑
e5

“Fruit exposed to 1-MCP were resistant to applied ethylene, with firmness declining 10 (1.0 μL·L -1 1-MCP) to 20% (0.5 μL·L -1 ) during storage for 14 d at 15 °C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–976 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit treated with 1-MCP at 1.0 μL·L -1 was 28% firmer than air-only controls.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
1-MCP at 1.0 μL·L -1e6
Outcome
Firmnesse6
Direction
highere6
Value
28%e6
Comparator
controls receiving only aire6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Prolongs Cucumber Fruit Shelf Life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–73 · show in text ↑
e6

“Firmness of fruit treated with 1-MCP at 1.0 μL·L -1 was 28% higher than controls receiving only air, suggesting that ethylene production contributes to softening of cucumber during storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1166 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Ethylene production is suggested to contribute to softening of cucumber during storage.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Outcome
softening of cucumber during storagee6
Qualifier
ethylene productione6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Prolongs Cucumber Fruit Shelf Life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–73 · show in text ↑
e6

“Firmness of fruit treated with 1-MCP at 1.0 μL·L -1 was 28% higher than controls receiving only air, suggesting that ethylene production contributes to softening of cucumber during storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Softening and watersoaking of ethylene-treated fruit were accompanied by pectin molecular mass downshifts.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
ethylenee7
Outcome
pectin mol masse7
Direction
downshiftse7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Prolongs Cucumber Fruit Shelf Life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–73 · show in text ↑
e7

“The softening and watersoaking of fruit treated with ethylene was accompanied by downshifts in pectin mol mass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1278 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP significantly reduced pectin molecular mass downshifts in cucumber fruit.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
1-MCPe1
Outcome
mol mass downshiftse1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Prolongs Cucumber Fruit Shelf Life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fruit exposed to 1-MCP showed significantly reduced mol mass downshifts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1351 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The cucumber PCD response to ethylene is largely prevented by suppression of ethylene perception.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Outcome
PCD responsee1
Qualifier
suppression of ethylene perceptione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Prolongs Cucumber Fruit Shelf Life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“The data indicate that cucumber show a PCD response to ethylene that is largely prevented by suppression of ethylene perception”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1353–1480 · show in text ↑

1-methylcyclopropene · quality: postharvest · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

ethene · molecular: metabolites · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

ethene · quality: postharvest · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

ethene · disease · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.