Paper · 2013

Growth and yield reaction of wheat to Effective Microorganisms and parthenium green manure

Jamilu T. Khan; F Samina

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus L.) is rapidly spreading in many countries around the world and has become a serious threat to nature as well as managed ecosystems. The present pot experiment was conducted in 2005 -2006 to study the effect of parthenium green manure (1, 2, 3 and 4% on fresh weight bases) and EM (effective microorganisms), a biofertilizer, on the growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). EM application was carried out by applying 1 L of 0.2% dilution of the commercial stock EM solution per pot at fortnight intervals throughout the experimental period. Plants were harvested at flowering and maturity stages. Shoot length and dry biomass were gradually increased by increasing the quantity of green manure. There was 272% increase in shoot dry biomass over control at maturity due to 4% green manure application as compared to 137% increase due to recommended dose of nitrogen-phosphorus-potassium (NPK) fertilizer. Highest root biomass was recorded in 3% green manure amended treatment. Spike length, number of grains per spike and grains yield was also gradually increased by increasing the quantity of green manure. There was 43 to 253% increase in grain yield over control due to various green manure treatments as compared to 96% increase due to NPK fertilizers over control. EM application in un-amended control, NPK fertilizers as well as in various green manure treatments either exhibited insignificant effect or significantly reduced various studied parameters. The present study concludes that parthenium weed has the potential to be used as green manure for wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat shoot length increased progressively with green manure quantity.

Treatment
green manuree0
Outcome
Shoot lengthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot length and dry biomass were gradually increased by increasing the quantity of green manure.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–745 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat shoot dry biomass increased progressively with green manure quantity.

Treatment
green manuree0
Outcome
dry biomasse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot length and dry biomass were gradually increased by increasing the quantity of green manure.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–745 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four percent green manure raised mature wheat shoot dry biomass by 272% over control.

Organ / stage
maturitye0
Treatment
4% green manure applicatione0
Outcome
shoot dry biomasse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
272%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was 272% increase in shoot dry biomass over control at maturity due to 4% green manure application as compared to 137% increase due to recommended dose of nitrogen-phosphorus-potassium (NPK) fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–954 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended NPK fertilizer raised mature wheat shoot dry biomass by 137% over control.

Organ / stage
maturitye0
Treatment
recommended dose of nitrogen-phosphorus-potassium (NPK) fertilizere0
Outcome
shoot dry biomasse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
137%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was 272% increase in shoot dry biomass over control at maturity due to 4% green manure application as compared to 137% increase due to recommended dose of nitrogen-phosphorus-potassium (NPK) fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–954 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three percent green manure produced the highest root biomass.

Treatment
3% green manure amended treatmente0
Outcome
root biomasse0
Direction
Higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest root biomass was recorded in 3% green manure amended treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1026 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat spike length, grains per spike, and grain yield rose progressively with green manure quantity.

Treatment
green manuree0
Outcome
Spike length, number of grains per spike and grains yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spike length, number of grains per spike and grains yield was also gradually increased by increasing the quantity of green manure.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1157 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Various green manure treatments raised wheat grain yield by 43 to 253% over control.

Treatment
various green manure treatmentse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
43 to 253%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was 43 to 253% increase in grain yield over control due to various green manure treatments as compared to 96% increase due to NPK fertilizers over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1319 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK fertilizer increased wheat grain yield by 96% over control.

Treatment
NPK fertilizerse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
96%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was 43 to 253% increase in grain yield over control due to various green manure treatments as compared to 96% increase due to NPK fertilizers over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1319 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EM application across control, NPK and green manure conditions had insignificant or significantly negative effects on studied wheat parameters.

Treatment
EM applicatione0
Outcome
various studied parameterse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“EM application in un-amended control, NPK fertilizers as well as in various green manure treatments either exhibited insignificant effect or significantly reduced various studied parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1510 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose parthenium weed as green manure for wheat.

Outcome
parthenium weed has the potential to be used as green manure for wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The present study concludes that parthenium weed has the potential to be used as green manure for wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1511–1615 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

551 papers: 426 positive, 125 negative or no effect

425 papers in the same direction as this paper · 116 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

547 papers more in this group

See all 551 papers →

fertilization · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

755 papers: 663 positive, 92 negative or no effect

662 papers in the same direction as this paper · 89 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

751 papers more in this group

See all 755 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.