Abstract
Annual forage crops such as oats and forage sorghum are sources of high-quality feed for mixed grain and beef enterprises in the northern region. However forage productivity declines over time as organic matter and subsequent supply of nutrients decrease with continued cultivation. The use of fertilisers to maintain production from oats and forage sorghum is common practice in higher rainfall and irrigated situations, however fertiliser use in generally drier and more variable environments such as the Brigalow belt is minimal despite declining productivity. We undertook a desktop, modelling assessment of the feasibility of fertilising these forages with nitrogen and phosphorus in the Brigalow belt in southern and central Queensland to better understand the dry matter and feed quality responses necessary to generate positive economic impacts. Results indicated significantly higher dry matter production is possible with fertiliser use, which can lead to higher animal liveweight gain and stocking rates. However under current market conditions the additional costs associated with applying fertiliser outweighed the extra benefits that can be generated. A combination of high dry-matter and animal production responses, lower costs associated with fertiliser application and positive price margins for the livestock grazing the forage are required to make fertiliser application consistently profitable. This modelling study demonstrates land-managers in the northern region need to carefully consider and monitor both the production and economic responses from trial areas before paddock scale applications are implemented.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Model suggested fertiliser can significantly raise dry matter production.
- Taxon
- oats and forage sorghumt0
- Treatment
- fertiliser usee0
- Outcome
- dry matter productione0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Results indicated significantly higher dry matter production is possible with fertiliser use”
t0“oats and forage sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
Higher forage production can lead to higher animal liveweight gain.
Verbatim
e0“which can lead to higher animal liveweight gain and stocking rates”
e1“higher dry matter production is possible with fertiliser use”
t0“oats and forage sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
Higher forage production can lead to higher stocking rates.
Verbatim
e0“which can lead to higher animal liveweight gain and stocking rates”
e1“higher dry matter production is possible with fertiliser use”
t0“oats and forage sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
Under current market conditions fertilizer costs outweighed added benefits.
Verbatim
e0“under current market conditions the additional costs associated with applying fertiliser outweighed the extra benefits that can be generated”
t0“oats and forage sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
Consistent profitability requires high production responses, lower fertilizer costs and positive livestock price margins.
Verbatim
e0“A combination of high dry-matter and animal production responses, lower costs associated with fertiliser application and positive price margins for the livestock grazing the forage are required to make fertiliser application consistently profitable.”
t0“oats and forage sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
Land managers should monitor production and economic responses in trial areas before paddock-scale fertilizer application.
Verbatim
e0“land-managers in the northern region need to carefully consider and monitor both the production and economic responses from trial areas before paddock scale applications are implemented”
t0“oats and forage sorghum”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results
142 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- negative
156 papers more in this group
See all 160 papers →fertilization · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results
417 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
442 papers more in this group
See all 446 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.