Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Agronomy farm, S.K.N. College of Agriculture, Jobner (Jaipur) during two consecutive rabi seasons of 2012-13 and 2013-14 to study the performance of coriander varieties under different levels of sulphur and zinc grown on irrigated loamy sand soil of semi arid eastern plain zone of Rajasthan. The experiment consisting of two varieties, four levels of sulphur and four zinc levels making 32 treatment combinations were replicated three times in split plot design, keeping varieties and sulphur in main plots and zinc in sub plots. Variety RCr-436 represented significantly higher magnitude of growth parameters (number of branches per plant at 90 DAS and at harvest and dry matter accumulation per plant at 30, 60, 90 DAS and at harvest), chlorophyll content in leaves at 50 DAS, yield attributes (umbels/plant, umbellets/umbel, seeds/umbel), seed, stover and biological yields as compared to RCr-435. Nitrogen concentration in seed, total uptake of nitrogen, sulphur and zinc, essential oil content in seed, oil yield and net returns (` 39396/ha) were also significantly higher in variety RCr-436 over RCr-435. Contrarily, variety RCr-435 recorded significantly higher plant height (at 60, 90 DAS and at harvest) as compared to RCr-436. Application of sulphur upto 40 kg/ha significantly increased the plant height (at 60, 90 DAS and at harvest), number of branches per plant at 90 DAS and at harvest, dry matter accumulation per plant (at 30, 60, 90 DAS and at harvest), chlorophyll content in leaves at 50 DAS, umbels/plant, umbellets/umbel, seeds/umbel, seed, stover and biological yields, nitrogen and zinc concentration in seed, their total uptake, protein and essential oil content in seed, oil yield and net returns. However, test weight improved significantly with 40 kg S/ha over control. The sulphur concentration in seed and total sulphur uptake increased significantly with increasing levels of sulphur upto 60 kg/ha. Fertilizing the crop with 40 kg S/ha fetched significantly higher seed yield (1406 kg/ha) and net returns (` 39175/ha) with increase of 20.8, 39.0 and 7.5, 12.7 per cent over control and 20 kg S/ha. The economic optimum dose of sulphur as derived from response function was found to be 59.86 kg/ha. Results further revealed that the application of zinc upto 5 kg/ha significantly increased the plant height (at 60, 90 DAS and at harvest), number of branches per plant (at 90 DAS and at harvest), dry matter accumulation (at 30, 60, 90 DAS and at harvest), chlorophyll content in leaves at 50 DAS, umbels/plant, umbellets/umbel, seeds/umbels, test weight, seed, stover and biological yields, nitrogen, sulphur and zinc concentration in seed, zinc concentration in stover, protein, essential oil content in seed, oil yield and net returns. However, total nitrogen, sulphur and zinc uptake and oil yield were significantly increased due to 7.5 kg Zn/ha over control, 2.5 and 5 kg Zn/ha. Application of 5 kg Zn/ha significantly increased seed yield (1436 kg/ha) and net returns (`39309/ha) with registered an increase of 30.3, 35.2 and 10.5, 10.4 per cent over control and 2.5 kg Zn/ha. The optimum dose of zinc as derived from response function was found to be 7.62 kg/ha. * Ph. D. student, Department of Agronomy, S.K.N. College of Agriculture, Jobner, Sri Karan Narendra Agriculture University, Jobner, Jaipur. ** Thesis submitted to Sri Karan Narendra Agriculture University, Jobner, Jaipur in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in faculty of Agriculture in the subject of Agronomy under the supervision of Dr. A.C. Shivran, Professor (Agronomy), S.K.N. College of Agriculture, Jobner, Jaipur (Rajasthan). xa/kd o tLrk ds fofHkUu Lrjksa ij /kfu;k 1⁄4dksfj;UMae lsVkboe ,y-1⁄2 esa fdLeksa dk dk;Z mRikndrk ek/kqjh eh.kk * MkW,-lh- f’kojku ** 1⁄4’kks/kdrkZ1⁄2 1⁄4eq[; lykgdkj1⁄2 vuq{ksi.k /kfu;k dh nks fdLeksa esa xa/kd ,oa ftad ds fofHkUu Lrjksa ds iz;ksx dk v/;;u djus ds fy, jktLFkku ds v}Z&'kqd iwohZ eSnkuh {kS= dh flafpr nkseV cyqbZ e`nk ij Jh d.kZ ujsUnz d`fk egkfo|ky;] tkscusj 1⁄4t;iqj1⁄2 ds lL; foKku iz{ks= ij yxkrkj jch esa nks okZ 2012&13 ,oa 2013&14b esa ijh{k.k fd;k x;kA iz;ksx ds mipkj la;kstdksa ftuesa nks fdLesa 1⁄4vkj-lh-vkj-&435 ,oa vkj-lh-vkj- &4361⁄2] pkj xa/kd ds Lrjksa 1⁄40] 20] 40 ,oa 60 fd-xzkizfr gS-1⁄2 ,oa pkj ftad ds Lrjksa 1⁄40] 2-5] 5-0 ,oa 7-5 fd-xzkizfr gS-1⁄2 ds cRrhl mipkj ds la;kstd cuk, x,] mudk eqqY;kadu [kf.Mr Hkw&[k.M vfHkdYiuk esa rhu iqujko`fRr;ksa ds lkFk fd;k x;kA ftuesa /kfu;k dh nks fdLesa ,oa xa/kd ds lkr Lrjks ds la;kstd mipkj eq[; [k.Mksa esa rFkk tLrk ds pkj Lrjksa dks mi&[k.Mksa esa fy;k x;kA fdLe vkj-lh-vkj-&436 ds o`f} dkjdksa 1⁄4izfr ikS/kk 'kk[kkvksa dh la[;k ,oa izfr ikS/kk 'kqd inkFkZ laxzg.k cqokbZ ds 30] 60] 90 fnu ckn ,oa dVkbZ ij1⁄2] i.kZ gfjr dh ek=k 50 fnu ij vkSj mit dkjdksa 1⁄4izfr ikni iqi N=ks dh la[;k] izfr iqi N=] iqi NkMh;ksa dh la[;k ,oa izfr iqi N=h chtks dh la[;k1⁄2 vkSj cht ,oa Hkwls dh mit esa vkj-lh-vkj-&435 dh vis{kk lkFkZd o`f} ik;h x;hA cht esa ukbVakstu dh lkanzrk rFkk ukbVakstu] xa/kd ,oa tLrk dk dqy mn~xzg.k] oki'khy rsy dh mit ,oa 'kq} vk; 1⁄439396 :izfr gS-1⁄2 vkj-lh-vkj-&435 ds eqdkcys csgrj lkFkZdrk ik;h x;hA blds foijhr] vkj-lh-vkj-&435 esa ikS/ks dh AapkbZ 1⁄4cqokbZ ds 60] 90 fnu ckn ,oa dVkbZ ij1⁄2 esa vkj-lh-vkj-&436 dh vis{kk vf/kd lkFkZdrk ik;h x;hA xa/kd ds 40 fd-xzk izfr gSrd c ikni dh AapkbZ 1⁄4cqokbZ ds 30] 60] 90 fnu ,oa dVkbZ ij1⁄2 izfr ikS/kk 'kk[kkvksa dh la[;k] izfr ikni 'kqd inkFkZ lap;u 1⁄4cqokbZ ds 30] 60] 90 fnu ,oa dVkbZ ij1⁄2] ifRr;ksa es lEiw.kZ i.kZ gfjr dh ek=k 50 fnu ij] izfr ikni iqiN=ks dh la[;k] izfr iqiN= iqi NkMh;ks dh la[;k] izfr iqiN=h chtks dh la[;k ,oa cht] Hkqlk ,oa tSfod mit] cht o Hkqlk esa ukbVakstu ,oa tLrk dh lkUnzrk] mudk dqy mn~xzzg.k] cht esa izksVhu ,oa oki’khy rsy dh ek=k rasy mit ,oa 'kq} vk;A tcfd ijh{k.k Hkkj fu;a=.k ij 40 fd-xzkxa/kd izfr gSDVj iz;ksx }kjk lkFkZd vf/kd ik;s x;sA xa/kd dh lkUnzrk cht esa ,oa dqy xa/kd mn~zzxzg.k xa/kd ds c fo|kokpLifr Nk=] lL; foKku foHkkx] Jh d.kZ ujsUnz d`fk egkfo|ky;] tkscusj ** d`fk ladk; esa fo|kokpLifr mikf/k dh vkaf’kd vko’;drk dh iwfrZ ds fy, MkW,-lhf’kojku] vkpk;Z] lL; foKku foHkkx] Jh d.kZ ujsUnz d`fk egkfo|ky;] tkscusj 1⁄4jktLFkku1⁄2] Jh d.kZ ujsUnz d`fk fo’ofo|ky;] tkscusj ds funsZ’ku esa izLrqr fd;k x;k 'kkS/kxzaFk gq, Lrjks 60 fd-xzkizfr gS xa/kd ds vuqiz;ksx ls lkFkZd o`f} gqbZA Qly esa 40 fd-xzkxa/kd izfr gSDVs;j nsus ls cht mit 1⁄41406 fd-xzkizfr gS-1⁄2 ,oa 'kq} vk; 1⁄4`39175 izfr gS-1⁄2 dk 20-8] 39-0 ,oa 7-5] 12-7 izfr’kr xa/kd fofgu o 20 fd- xzkizfr gSdh rqyuk es lkFkZd :i ls T;knk izkIr fd;kA vuqfO;k Qyu ds }kjk x/kad dh 59-86 fdyksxzke izfr gSDVj vf/kd bVre [kqjkd dh x.kuk dh x;hA ifj.kkeksa os n’kkZ;k fd ikS/kks dh AipkbZ 1⁄4cqokbZ ds 60] 90 fnu ,oa dVkbZ ij1⁄2 izfr ikS/kk 'kk[kkvks dh la[;k] izfr ikni 'kqd inkFkZ lap;u] 1⁄4cqokbZ ds 30] 60] 90 fnu ,oa dVkbZ ij1⁄2 ifRr;ks es i.kZgfjr dh ek=k 50 fnu ij] izfr ikni iqiN=ks dh la[;k] izfr iqiN= iqi NkMh;ks dh la[;k] izfr iqiN=h chtks dh la[;k] ifj{k.k Hkkj] cht] Hkqlk ,oa tSfod mit] cht ds ukbVakstu] xa/kd ,oa tLrk dh lkUnzrk] Hkqls es tLrk dh lkUnzrk] cht es izksVhu ,oa oki'khy rsy dh ek=k] rsy mit ,oa 'kq} vk; 7-5 fd-xzktLrk izfr gSds iz;ksx ls dqy ukbVakstu] xa/kd ,oa tLrk mn~xzg.k fu;a=.k] 2-5 ,oa 5-0 fd-xzktLrk izfr gSij lkFkZd vf/kd FksA 5 fdxzk tLrk izfr gSds iz;ksx ls cht mit 1⁄41436 fd-xzkizfr gS-1⁄2] 'kq} vk; 1⁄4`39309 izfr gS-1⁄2 dk 30-3] 35-2 ,oa 10-5] 10-4 izfr’kr fu;a=.k ,oa 2-5 fd-xzk- tLrk izfr gSij vf/kd lkFkZd ik;s x;sA vuqfO;k Qyu ds }kjk tLrk dh 7-62 fdyksxke izfr gSDVj vf/kd bVre [kqjkd dh x.kuk dh x;hA V1S20Zn2.5 V2S60Zn7.5 V1S40Zn0 V2S0Zn5.0 V1S60Zn0 V2S0Zn2.5 V1S40Zn7.5 V2S20Zn5.0 V1S40Zn5.0 V2S20Zn0 V1S60Zn7.5 V2S0Zn2.5 V1S20Zn0 V2S60Zn5.0 V1S40Zn7.5 V2S0Zn2.5 V1S60Zn2.5 V2S0Zn5.0 V1S40Zn0 V2S20Zn7.5 V1S40Zn0 V2S20Zn5.0 V1S60Zn2.5 V2S0Zn7.5 V1S20Zn7.5 V2S60Zn2.5 V1S40Zn5.0 V2S0Zn0 V1S60Zn5.0 V2S0Zn7.5 V1S40Zn2.5 V2S20Zn0 V1S40Zn2.5 V2S20Zn7.5 V1S60Zn5.0 V2S0Zn0 V1S20Zn5.0 V2S60Zn0 V1S40Zn2.5 V2S0Zn7.5 V1S60Zn7.5 V2S0Zn0 V1S40Zn5.0 V2S20Zn2.5 V1S40Zn7.5 V2S20Zn2.5 V1S60Zn0 V2S0Zn5.0 V2S40Zn0 V1S0Zn7.5 V2S20Zn5.0 V1S60Zn2.5 V2S40Zn0 V1S20Zn5.0 V2S60Zn2.5 V1S0Zn7.5 V2S60Zn0 V1S0Zn5.0 V2S40Zn7.5 V1S20Zn2.5 V2S40Zn2.5 V1S0Zn5.0 V2S20Zn0 V1S60Zn7.5 V2S40Zn7.5 V1S20Zn2.5 V2S60Zn0 V1S0Zn5.0 V2S60Zn2.5 V1S0Zn7.5 V2S40Zn0 V1S20Zn5.0 V2S40Zn5.0 V1S0Zn2.5 V2S20Zn7.5 V1S60Zn0 V2S40Zn0 V1S20Zn7.5 V2S60Zn5.0 V1S0Zn0 V2S60Zn5 V1S0Zn0 V2S40Zn2.5 V1S20Zn7.5 V2S40Zn7.5 V1S0Zn0 V2S20Zn2.5 V1S60Zn5.0 V2S40Zn5.0 V1S20Zn0 V2S60Zn7.5 V1S0Zn2.5 V2S60Zn7.5 V1S0Zn2.5 V2S40Zn5.0 V1S20Zn0 R-I 37m

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety RCr-436 had significantly higher growth parameters than RCr-435.

Taxon
Coriandrum sativumCoriandrum sativumt0
Material
RCr-436e1
Outcome
growth parameterse1
Direction
highere1
Qualifier
number of branches per plant at 90 DAS and at harveste1
Comparator
RCr-435e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coriandrum sativum
Coriandrum sativum · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Performance of Coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) Varieties Under Different Levels of Sulphur and Zinc (PhD)(SKNAU)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–114 · show in text ↑
e1

“Variety RCr-436 represented significantly higher magnitude of growth parameters (number of branches per plant at 90 DAS and at harvest and dry matter accumulation per plant at 30, 60, 90 DAS and at harvest), chlorophyll content in leaves at 50 DAS, yield attributes (umbels/plant, umbellets/umbel, seeds/umbel), seed, stover and biological yields as compared to RCr-435”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–936 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety RCr-436 had higher chlorophyll content in leaves at 50 DAS than RCr-435.

Taxon
Coriandrum sativumCoriandrum sativumt0
Material
RCr-436e1
Outcome
chlorophyll content in leaves at 50 DASe1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
RCr-435e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coriandrum sativum
Coriandrum sativum · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Performance of Coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) Varieties Under Different Levels of Sulphur and Zinc (PhD)(SKNAU)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–114 · show in text ↑
e1

“Variety RCr-436 represented significantly higher magnitude of growth parameters (number of branches per plant at 90 DAS and at harvest and dry matter accumulation per plant at 30, 60, 90 DAS and at harvest), chlorophyll content in leaves at 50 DAS, yield attributes (umbels/plant, umbellets/umbel, seeds/umbel), seed, stover and biological yields as compared to RCr-435”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–936 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety RCr-436 had higher yield attributes than RCr-435.

Taxon
Coriandrum sativumCoriandrum sativumt0
Material
RCr-436e1
Outcome
yield attributese1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
RCr-435e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coriandrum sativum
Coriandrum sativum · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Performance of Coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) Varieties Under Different Levels of Sulphur and Zinc (PhD)(SKNAU)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–114 · show in text ↑
e1

“Variety RCr-436 represented significantly higher magnitude of growth parameters (number of branches per plant at 90 DAS and at harvest and dry matter accumulation per plant at 30, 60, 90 DAS and at harvest), chlorophyll content in leaves at 50 DAS, yield attributes (umbels/plant, umbellets/umbel, seeds/umbel), seed, stover and biological yields as compared to RCr-435”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–936 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety RCr-436 had higher seed, stover and biological yields than RCr-435.

Taxon
Coriandrum sativumCoriandrum sativumt0
Material
RCr-436e1
Outcome
seed, stover and biological yieldse1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
RCr-435e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coriandrum sativum
Coriandrum sativum · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Performance of Coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) Varieties Under Different Levels of Sulphur and Zinc (PhD)(SKNAU)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–114 · show in text ↑
e1

“Variety RCr-436 represented significantly higher magnitude of growth parameters (number of branches per plant at 90 DAS and at harvest and dry matter accumulation per plant at 30, 60, 90 DAS and at harvest), chlorophyll content in leaves at 50 DAS, yield attributes (umbels/plant, umbellets/umbel, seeds/umbel), seed, stover and biological yields as compared to RCr-435”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–936 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety RCr-436 had higher essential oil content, oil yield and net returns than RCr-435.

Taxon
Coriandrum sativumCoriandrum sativumt0
Material
RCr-436e2
Outcome
essential oil content in seed, oil yield and net returnse2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
RCr-435e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coriandrum sativum
Coriandrum sativum · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Performance of Coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) Varieties Under Different Levels of Sulphur and Zinc (PhD)(SKNAU)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–114 · show in text ↑
e2

“Nitrogen concentration in seed, total uptake of nitrogen, sulphur and zinc, essential oil content in seed, oil yield and net returns (` 39396/ha) were also significantly higher in variety RCr-436 over RCr-435”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1146 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety RCr-436 had higher nitrogen concentration in seed and total uptake of nitrogen, sulphur and zinc than RCr-435.

Taxon
Coriandrum sativumCoriandrum sativumt0
Material
RCr-436e2
Outcome
Nitrogen concentration in seed, total uptake of nitrogen, sulphur and zince2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
RCr-435e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coriandrum sativum
Coriandrum sativum · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Performance of Coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) Varieties Under Different Levels of Sulphur and Zinc (PhD)(SKNAU)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–114 · show in text ↑
e2

“Nitrogen concentration in seed, total uptake of nitrogen, sulphur and zinc, essential oil content in seed, oil yield and net returns (` 39396/ha) were also significantly higher in variety RCr-436 over RCr-435”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1146 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety RCr-435 had higher plant height than RCr-436.

Taxon
Coriandrum sativumCoriandrum sativumt0
Material
RCr-435e3
Outcome
plant heighte3
Direction
highere3
Qualifier
at 60, 90 DAS and at harveste3
Comparator
RCr-436e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coriandrum sativum
Coriandrum sativum · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Performance of Coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) Varieties Under Different Levels of Sulphur and Zinc (PhD)(SKNAU)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–114 · show in text ↑
e3

“Variety RCr-435 recorded significantly higher plant height (at 60, 90 DAS and at harvest) as compared to RCr-436”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1160–1272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur up to 40 kg/ha increased plant height.

Taxon
Coriandrum sativumCoriandrum sativumt0
Treatment
Application of sulphur upto 40 kg/hae4
Outcome
plant heighte4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coriandrum sativum
Coriandrum sativum · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Performance of Coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) Varieties Under Different Levels of Sulphur and Zinc (PhD)(SKNAU)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–114 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of sulphur upto 40 kg/ha significantly increased the plant height (at 60, 90 DAS and at harvest), number of branches per plant at 90 DAS and at harvest, dry matter accumulation per plant (at 30, 60, 90 DAS and at harvest), chlorophyll content in leaves at 50 DAS, umbels/plant, umbellets/umbel, seeds/umbel, seed, stover and biological yields, nitrogen and zinc concentration in seed, their total uptake, protein and essential oil content in seed, oil yield and net returns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1759 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur up to 40 kg/ha increased dry matter accumulation per plant.

Taxon
Coriandrum sativumCoriandrum sativumt0
Treatment
Application of sulphur upto 40 kg/hae4
Outcome
dry matter accumulation per plante4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coriandrum sativum
Coriandrum sativum · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Performance of Coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) Varieties Under Different Levels of Sulphur and Zinc (PhD)(SKNAU)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–114 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of sulphur upto 40 kg/ha significantly increased the plant height (at 60, 90 DAS and at harvest), number of branches per plant at 90 DAS and at harvest, dry matter accumulation per plant (at 30, 60, 90 DAS and at harvest), chlorophyll content in leaves at 50 DAS, umbels/plant, umbellets/umbel, seeds/umbel, seed, stover and biological yields, nitrogen and zinc concentration in seed, their total uptake, protein and essential oil content in seed, oil yield and net returns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1759 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur up to 40 kg/ha increased the number of branches per plant.

Taxon
Coriandrum sativumCoriandrum sativumt0
Treatment
Application of sulphur upto 40 kg/hae4
Outcome
number of branches per plant at 90 DAS and at harveste4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coriandrum sativum
Coriandrum sativum · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Performance of Coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) Varieties Under Different Levels of Sulphur and Zinc (PhD)(SKNAU)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–114 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of sulphur upto 40 kg/ha significantly increased the plant height (at 60, 90 DAS and at harvest), number of branches per plant at 90 DAS and at harvest, dry matter accumulation per plant (at 30, 60, 90 DAS and at harvest), chlorophyll content in leaves at 50 DAS, umbels/plant, umbellets/umbel, seeds/umbel, seed, stover and biological yields, nitrogen and zinc concentration in seed, their total uptake, protein and essential oil content in seed, oil yield and net returns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1759 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur up to 40 kg/ha increased seed, stover and biological yields.

Taxon
Coriandrum sativumCoriandrum sativumt0
Treatment
Application of sulphur upto 40 kg/hae4
Outcome
seed, stover and biological yieldse4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coriandrum sativum
Coriandrum sativum · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Performance of Coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) Varieties Under Different Levels of Sulphur and Zinc (PhD)(SKNAU)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–114 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of sulphur upto 40 kg/ha significantly increased the plant height (at 60, 90 DAS and at harvest), number of branches per plant at 90 DAS and at harvest, dry matter accumulation per plant (at 30, 60, 90 DAS and at harvest), chlorophyll content in leaves at 50 DAS, umbels/plant, umbellets/umbel, seeds/umbel, seed, stover and biological yields, nitrogen and zinc concentration in seed, their total uptake, protein and essential oil content in seed, oil yield and net returns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1759 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur up to 40 kg/ha increased nitrogen and zinc concentration in seed.

Taxon
Coriandrum sativumCoriandrum sativumt0
Treatment
Application of sulphur upto 40 kg/hae4
Outcome
nitrogen and zinc concentration in seede4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coriandrum sativum
Coriandrum sativum · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Performance of Coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) Varieties Under Different Levels of Sulphur and Zinc (PhD)(SKNAU)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–114 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of sulphur upto 40 kg/ha significantly increased the plant height (at 60, 90 DAS and at harvest), number of branches per plant at 90 DAS and at harvest, dry matter accumulation per plant (at 30, 60, 90 DAS and at harvest), chlorophyll content in leaves at 50 DAS, umbels/plant, umbellets/umbel, seeds/umbel, seed, stover and biological yields, nitrogen and zinc concentration in seed, their total uptake, protein and essential oil content in seed, oil yield and net returns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1759 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur at 40 kg/ha improved test weight over control.

Taxon
Coriandrum sativumCoriandrum sativumt0
Treatment
40 kg S/hae5
Outcome
test weighte5
Direction
improvede5
Comparator
controle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coriandrum sativum
Coriandrum sativum · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Performance of Coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) Varieties Under Different Levels of Sulphur and Zinc (PhD)(SKNAU)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–114 · show in text ↑
e5

“However, test weight improved significantly with 40 kg S/ha over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1761–1833 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur concentration in seed and total sulphur uptake increased with sulphur levels up to 60 kg/ha.

Taxon
Coriandrum sativumCoriandrum sativumt0
Treatment
upto 60 kg/hae6
Outcome
sulphur concentration in seede6
Direction
increasede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coriandrum sativum
Coriandrum sativum · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Performance of Coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) Varieties Under Different Levels of Sulphur and Zinc (PhD)(SKNAU)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–114 · show in text ↑
e6

“The sulphur concentration in seed and total sulphur uptake increased significantly with increasing levels of sulphur upto 60 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1835–1965 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur at 40 kg/ha gave higher seed yield (1406 kg/ha) than control and 20 kg S/ha.

Taxon
Coriandrum sativumCoriandrum sativumt0
Treatment
Fertilizing the crop with 40 kg S/hae7
Outcome
seed yielde7
Direction
highere7
Value
1406 kg/hae7
Qualifier
increase of 20.8, 39.0 and 7.5, 12.7 per cente7
Comparator
control and 20 kg S/hae7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coriandrum sativum
Coriandrum sativum · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Performance of Coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) Varieties Under Different Levels of Sulphur and Zinc (PhD)(SKNAU)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–114 · show in text ↑
e7

“Fertilizing the crop with 40 kg S/ha fetched significantly higher seed yield (1406 kg/ha) and net returns (` 39175/ha) with increase of 20.8, 39.0 and 7.5, 12.7 per cent over control and 20 kg S/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1967–2164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur at 40 kg/ha gave higher net returns (39175/ha) than control and 20 kg S/ha.

Taxon
Coriandrum sativumCoriandrum sativumt0
Treatment
Fertilizing the crop with 40 kg S/hae7
Outcome
net returnse7
Direction
highere7
Value
39175/hae7
Comparator
control and 20 kg S/hae7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coriandrum sativum
Coriandrum sativum · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Performance of Coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) Varieties Under Different Levels of Sulphur and Zinc (PhD)(SKNAU)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–114 · show in text ↑
e7

“Fertilizing the crop with 40 kg S/ha fetched significantly higher seed yield (1406 kg/ha) and net returns (` 39175/ha) with increase of 20.8, 39.0 and 7.5, 12.7 per cent over control and 20 kg S/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1967–2164 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The economic optimum dose of sulphur is 59.86 kg/ha.

Taxon
Coriandrum sativumCoriandrum sativumt0
Outcome
economic optimum dose of sulphure0
Value
59.86 kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coriandrum sativum
Coriandrum sativum · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Performance of Coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) Varieties Under Different Levels of Sulphur and Zinc (PhD)(SKNAU)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–114 · show in text ↑
e0

“The economic optimum dose of sulphur as derived from response function was found to be 59.86 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2166–2264 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc at 5 kg/ha increased seed yield to 1436 kg/ha.

Taxon
Coriandrum sativumCoriandrum sativumt0
Treatment
Application of 5 kg Zn/hae0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1436 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coriandrum sativum
Coriandrum sativum · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Performance of Coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) Varieties Under Different Levels of Sulphur and Zinc (PhD)(SKNAU)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–114 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of 5 kg Zn/ha significantly increased seed yield (1436 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2951–3024 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc at 7.5 kg/ha increased total nitrogen, sulphur and zinc uptake and oil yield over control, 2.5 and 5 kg/ha.

Taxon
Coriandrum sativumCoriandrum sativumt0
Treatment
7.5 kg Zn/hae0
Outcome
total nitrogen, sulphur and zinc uptake and oil yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control, 2.5 and 5 kg Zn/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coriandrum sativum
Coriandrum sativum · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Performance of Coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) Varieties Under Different Levels of Sulphur and Zinc (PhD)(SKNAU)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–114 · show in text ↑
e0

“total nitrogen, sulphur and zinc uptake and oil yield were significantly increased due to 7.5 kg Zn/ha over control, 2.5 and 5 kg Zn/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2814–2949 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimum dose of zinc is 7.62 kg/ha.

Taxon
Coriandrum sativumCoriandrum sativumt0
Outcome
optimum dose of zince0
Value
7.62 kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coriandrum sativum
Coriandrum sativum · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Performance of Coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) Varieties Under Different Levels of Sulphur and Zinc (PhD)(SKNAU)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–114 · show in text ↑
e0

“The optimum dose of zinc as derived from response function was found to be 7.62 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3150–3235 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · nutrient: content · Coriandrum sativum (coriander)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

zinc atom · quality: oil · Coriandrum sativum (coriander)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Coriandrum sativum (coriander)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

sulfur atom · yield · Coriandrum sativum (coriander)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

fertilization · yield · Coriandrum sativum (coriander)Positive and negative results

67 papers: 62 positive, 5 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.