Paper · 2016 · AIP conference proceedings

Effect of blanching treatments on antioxidant activity of frozen green capsicum (Capsicum annuum L. var bell pepper) using radical scavenging activity (DPPH) assay

Norafida Azizzuddin; Aminah Abdullah

5
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Blanching treatments are needed to deactivate enzymes in frozen vegetables. Antioxidant activity using DPPH radical scavenging activity assay were evaluated in steaming, boiling water, and microwave blanching at different temperature, time and microwave power level on frozen green capsicum. Green capsicum was chosen for frozen treatment compared to other capsicum with different maturity index because of the firm texture. The objective of this study was to compare the antioxidant activity of frozen green capsicum between conventional and Oxi Count Kit® assay for DPPH radical scavenging activity. Results showed frozen green capsicum blanched using microwave at high level/90 seconds (sample J) contained higher level of DPPH in both conventional method and Oxi Count Kit® compared to other treatments. However, there were no significant differences between sample J and fresh sample (sample A). Overall, the sequences from highest to lowest in blanching treatments for both DPPH conventional method, and DPPH Oxi Count Kit® were J (microwave high level/90 seconds) > A (Fresh) > H (Microwave Medium Level/120 seconds) > D (Boiling Water 80°C/150 seconds) > K (Microwave High Level/120 seconds) > I (Microwave Medium Level/150 seconds) > F (Microwave Low Level/150 seconds)> B (Steam 100°C/150 seconds) > E (Boiling Water 100°C /120 seconds) > G (Microwave Low Level /180 seconds)> C (Steam 100°C/180 seconds). Almost all frozen green capsicum samples showed no significant differences for comparison between test using DPPH conventional method and Oxi Count Kit®. Frozen storage for 0, and 3rd months showed no significant differences which indicate no changes on antioxidant activity during frozen storage at −18°C.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microwave blanching at high level for 90 seconds gave higher DPPH activity in capsicum than the other blanching treatments.

Taxon
Capsicum annuumCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
microwave at high level/90 secondse1
Outcome
level of DPPHe1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
other treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“frozen green capsicum blanched using microwave at high level/90 seconds (sample J) contained higher level of DPPH in both conventional method and Oxi Count Kit® compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–806 · show in text ↑
t0

“frozen green capsicum (Capsicum annuum L. var bell pepper)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Microwave blanching at high level for 90 seconds did not differ significantly in DPPH activity from fresh capsicum.

Taxon
Capsicum annuumCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
sample Je2
Outcome
Antioxidant activitye0
Direction
no_changeinferrede2
Comparator
fresh samplee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Antioxidant activity using DPPH radical scavenging activity assay were evaluated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–156 · show in text ↑
e2

“there were no significant differences between sample J and fresh sample (sample A)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–899 · show in text ↑
t0

“frozen green capsicum (Capsicum annuum L. var bell pepper)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blanching treatments of capsicum ranked from highest to lowest DPPH antioxidant activity, with microwave high level 90 seconds first and steam 100°C 180 seconds last.

Taxon
Capsicum annuumCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
blanching treatmentse3
Outcome
DPPH radical scavenging activitye0
Direction
highest to loweste3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Overall, the sequences from highest to lowest in blanching treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–970 · show in text ↑
e0

“Antioxidant activity using DPPH radical scavenging activity assay were evaluated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–156 · show in text ↑
t0

“frozen green capsicum (Capsicum annuum L. var bell pepper)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–116 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The conventional DPPH method and the Oxi Count Kit gave no significant differences for almost all frozen capsicum samples.

Taxon
Capsicum annuumCapsicum annuumt0
Outcome
comparison between test using DPPH conventional method and Oxi Count Kit®e4
Comparator
DPPH conventional methode4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Almost all frozen green capsicum samples showed no significant differences for comparison between test using DPPH conventional method and Oxi Count Kit®”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1416–1568 · show in text ↑
t0

“frozen green capsicum (Capsicum annuum L. var bell pepper)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Frozen storage at −18°C for 3 months did not change the antioxidant activity of capsicum relative to month 0.

Taxon
Capsicum annuumCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
frozen storage at −18°Ce5
Outcome
antioxidant activitye5
Direction
no_changeinferrede5
Comparator
0, and 3rd monthse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Frozen storage for 0, and 3rd months showed no significant differences which indicate no changes on antioxidant activity during frozen storage at −18°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1570–1721 · show in text ↑
t0

“frozen green capsicum (Capsicum annuum L. var bell pepper)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–116 · show in text ↑

processing · quality: phytochemicals · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

storage · quality: phytochemicals · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.