Paper · 1993 · HortScience

669 (PS 5) RESPONSES OF ORNAMENTAL FLOWERING CABBAGE AND KALE CULTIVARS TO FOUR COMMERCIAL GROWTH RETARDANTS

Johnny Carter; Sauveur Mahotiere

3
claims
7
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Four commercial growth retardants (B-nine, Cycocel, A-rest and Bonzi) were compared for their effectiveness in controlling the growth and development of three ornamental flowering cabbage cultivars (white, red, and pink) and two flowering ornamental kale cultivars (frizzy red and red peacock). Two weeks after transplanting; seedlings of each cultivar were sprayed with aqueous solutions of the four commercial growth retardants. Treatments for each cultivar were arranged in a randomized complete block design with 6 replications. Plant height, plant width and dry weight were the parameters used to measure growth and development. Treatments for each cultivar were rated for head formation and color development. Results showed that all the growth retardants except for cycocel significantly affected growth and development without any effect on head formation and color development. Bonzi caused the greatest growth suppression.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth retardants other than Cycocel significantly affected cabbage and kale growth and development.

Taxon
CABBAGE AND KALEt0
Treatment
all the growth retardants except for cycocele0
Outcome
growth and developmente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“all the growth retardants except for cycocel significantly affected growth and development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–826 · show in text ↑
t0

“ORNAMENTAL FLOWERING CABBAGE AND KALE CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth retardants did not affect head formation or color development.

Taxon
CABBAGE AND KALEt0
Treatment
all the growth retardants except for cycocele1
Outcome
head formation and color developmente0
Direction
without any effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“without any effect on head formation and color development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–885 · show in text ↑
e1

“all the growth retardants except for cycocel significantly affected growth and development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–826 · show in text ↑
t0

“ORNAMENTAL FLOWERING CABBAGE AND KALE CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bonzi caused the greatest growth suppression.

Taxon
CABBAGE AND KALEt0
Treatment
Bonzie0
Outcome
growth suppressione0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Bonzi caused the greatest growth suppression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–931 · show in text ↑
t0

“ORNAMENTAL FLOWERING CABBAGE AND KALE CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–71 · show in text ↑

class · quality: postharvest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.