Paper · 1982

SOME ASPECTS OF STRIPE RUST CONTROL IN SOUTHLAND

W. H. Risk; R.M. Beresford

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The control of stripe rust (Puccinia striijormis) in wheat by foliar spraying with the fungicide triadimefon was studied in spring-sown trials in Southland. In a trial at Gore, infection first developed in early December but developed at different rates in three cultivars. In unsprayed plots the cultivar Tiritea was severely affected, Kopara slightly affected and Karamu affected very little. Spraying either once (G.S. 5), twice (G.S. 10.5 and 11.1) or three times (G.S. 5, 10.5 and 11.1) increased yield significantly in Tiritea but not in Kopara or Karamu. Thousand grain weight and grains per head were both improved in Tiritea by spraying. The effect of late spraying (post flowering) on the susceptible cultivars Takahe and Tiritea gave variable results. A significant response in Tiritea up to late milk (G.S. 11.2) was recorded under high infection conditions ( >500Jo leaf infected). In other trials at lower rust levels, no yield responses were recorded even though the incidence of stripe rust on leaves and on heads was reduced.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stripe rust developed at different rates in three wheat cultivars.

Interactor
Puccinia striijormise1pathogen
Outcome
infectione0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“infection first developed in early December but developed at different rates in three cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–272 · show in text ↑
e1

“stripe rust (Puccinia striijormis) in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In unsprayed wheat plots, Tiritea was severely affected by stripe rust.

Material
Tiriteae0
Interactor
Puccinia striijormise1pathogen
Outcome
severely affectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In unsprayed plots the cultivar Tiritea was severely affected, Kopara slightly affected and Karamu affected very little.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–394 · show in text ↑
e1

“stripe rust (Puccinia striijormis) in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In unsprayed wheat plots, Kopara was slightly affected by stripe rust.

Material
Koparae0
Interactor
Puccinia striijormise1pathogen
Outcome
slightly affectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Kopara slightly affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–361 · show in text ↑
e1

“stripe rust (Puccinia striijormis) in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In unsprayed wheat plots, Karamu was affected very little by stripe rust.

Material
Karamue0
Interactor
Puccinia striijormise1pathogen
Outcome
affected very littlee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Karamu affected very little”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–393 · show in text ↑
e1

“stripe rust (Puccinia striijormis) in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

One, two, or three fungicide sprays significantly increased Tiritea yield.

Material
Tiriteae0
Treatment
Spraying either once (G.S. 5), twice (G.S. 10.5 and 11.1) or three times (G.S. 5, 10.5 and 11.1)e0
Interactor
Puccinia striijormise1pathogen
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spraying either once (G.S. 5), twice (G.S. 10.5 and 11.1) or three times (G.S. 5, 10.5 and 11.1) increased yield significantly in Tiritea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–532 · show in text ↑
e1

“stripe rust (Puccinia striijormis) in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying did not significantly increase Kopara yield.

Material
Koparae0
Outcome
yielde0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased yield significantly in Tiritea but not in Kopara or Karamu”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–560 · show in text ↑
e1

“stripe rust (Puccinia striijormis) in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying did not significantly increase Karamu yield.

Material
Karamue0
Outcome
yielde0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased yield significantly in Tiritea but not in Kopara or Karamu”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–560 · show in text ↑
e1

“stripe rust (Puccinia striijormis) in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying improved Tiritea thousand grain weight and grains per head.

Material
Tiriteae0
Treatment
sprayinge0
Outcome
Thousand grain weight and grains per heade0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thousand grain weight and grains per head were both improved in Tiritea by spraying.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–646 · show in text ↑
e1

“stripe rust (Puccinia striijormis) in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late spraying gave variable results in Takahe and Tiritea.

Treatment
late spraying (post flowering)e0
Outcome
variable resultse0
Qualifier
Takahe and Tiriteae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“late spraying (post flowering) on the susceptible cultivars Takahe and Tiritea gave variable results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–761 · show in text ↑
e1

“stripe rust (Puccinia striijormis) in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under high infection, Tiritea responded significantly to spraying through late milk stage.

Material
Tiriteae0
Outcome
responsee0
Qualifier
up to late milk (G.S. 11.2)e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant response in Tiritea up to late milk (G.S. 11.2) was recorded under high infection conditions ( >500Jo leaf infected).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–894 · show in text ↑
e1

“stripe rust (Puccinia striijormis) in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At lower rust levels, spraying did not produce yield responses.

Outcome
yield responsese0
Direction
noe0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In other trials at lower rust levels, no yield responses were recorded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–965 · show in text ↑
e1

“stripe rust (Puccinia striijormis) in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At lower rust levels, spraying reduced leaf and head stripe rust incidence.

Interactor
Puccinia striijormise1pathogen
Outcome
incidence of stripe rust on leaves and on headse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the incidence of stripe rust on leaves and on heads was reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1041 · show in text ↑
e1

“stripe rust (Puccinia striijormis) in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–58 · show in text ↑

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.