Paper · 2016 · Modern Applied Science

Estimation of Sugar Beet Yield and its Dry Matter Partitioning Under Different Irrigation and Nitrogen Levels

Hamidreza Kamali; Shahrokh Zand-Parsa

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In this study, a simple logistic model was developed for estimating total dry matter of sugar beet under different irrigation and nitrogen levels. The experiment was conducted using line source sprinkler irrigation in 2013 and furrow irrigation in 2014. Irrigation treatments were from 44% to 130% of full irrigation and applied nitrogen treatments ranged from 0 to 240 kg N ha-1. Results showed that the model was more accurate in predicting total dry matter at harvest date with the Normalized Root Mean Square Error (NRMSE) amounting to almost 10 percent. After total dry matter estimation, a model was needed for dry matter partitioning between different organs of sugar beet. To achieve this goal, another logistic model was developed and was compared with three revised models. Finally, white sugar content of root dry matter was estimated using a quadratic equation as a function of applied water and nitrogen. Validation results indicated that total and root dry matters, and white sugar yield were estimated fairly well. Results showed that excessive water had negative effects on total dry matter and root dry matter. Also, excessive nitrogen affected root dry matter negatively too, but even the excess had positive effects on total dry matter. In contrast to common belief, our results showed that drought stress reduced both ratios of root to leaf, and root to shoot dry matter.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A logistic model predicted total dry matter at harvest with NRMSE near 10 percent.

Outcome
total dry matter at harvest datee0
Direction
more accuratee0
Value
almost 10 percente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the model was more accurate in predicting total dry matter at harvest date with the Normalized Root Mean Square Error (NRMSE) amounting to almost 10 percent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–557 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–24 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Validation indicated fairly good estimation of total dry matter, root dry matter and white sugar yield.

Outcome
total and root dry matters, and white sugar yielde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total and root dry matters, and white sugar yield were estimated fairly well”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1028 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Excessive water reduced total dry matter.

Treatment
excessive watere0
Outcome
total dry mattere0
Direction
negative effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“excessive water had negative effects on total dry matter and root dry matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1126 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Excessive water reduced root dry matter.

Treatment
excessive watere0
Outcome
root dry mattere0
Direction
negative effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“excessive water had negative effects on total dry matter and root dry matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1126 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Excessive nitrogen negatively affected root dry matter.

Treatment
excessive nitrogene0
Outcome
root dry mattere0
Direction
negativelye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“excessive nitrogen affected root dry matter negatively too, but even the excess had positive effects on total dry matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1254 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Excessive nitrogen positively affected total dry matter.

Treatment
excessive nitrogene0
Outcome
total dry mattere0
Direction
positive effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“excessive nitrogen affected root dry matter negatively too, but even the excess had positive effects on total dry matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1254 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced root-to-leaf dry matter ratio.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
ratios of root to leafe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought stress reduced both ratios of root to leaf, and root to shoot dry matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1390 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced root-to-shoot dry matter ratio.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
root to shoot dry mattere0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought stress reduced both ratios of root to leaf, and root to shoot dry matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1390 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–24 · show in text ↑

drought · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

37 papers: 8 positive, 29 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

108 papers: 97 positive, 11 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

104 papers more in this group

See all 108 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.