Abstract
Seven genotypes (G), namely G1,G2,G3,G4,G5,G6 and G7 which were selected for yield, seed weight, number of productive panicles, panicle weight, shoot and root length, and the original population were planted in a field at different planting date (D), namely April 29; May 6, May 13 and May 20. Growth responses for leaf area, dry weight of leaf, stem and root were measured at 2, 3, 5, and 6 weeks after transplanting. Early planting inhibited growth of all genotypes in early stage but not differed in the late stage. Significant growth response of genotypes was caused mainly by the difference of planting date. Significant yield and yield components response was caused by the difference of genotypes. No significant G X D interaction for growth, yield and yield components, except for leaves area was observed. Genotypes selected for yield, number of productive panicles and panicle weight were relatively stable in different planting date and might be consider to be adapted for early spring planting. Photoperiod sensitivity was evidenced and pearl millet might be consider as a facultative shortday plant.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Early planting inhibited growth of all genotypes in the early stage.
- Taxon
- pearl millet
Cenchrus americanust0 - Material
- all genotypese2
- Treatment
- Early plantinge2
- Outcome
- growthe2
- Direction
- inhibitede2
- Qualifier
- in early stagee2
- Setting
- a fielde1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Pearl Millet (Pennisetum typhoideum Rich)”
e1“Seven genotypes (G), namely G1,G2,G3,G4,G5,G6 and G7 which were selected for yield, seed weight, number of productive panicles, panicle weight, shoot and root length, and the original population were planted in a field at different planting date (D), namely April 29; May 6, May 13 and May 20”
e2“Early planting inhibited growth of all genotypes in early stage but not differed in the late stage”
Claim · model-written summary
Early planting did not differ from later planting for growth in the late stage.
- Taxon
- pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
- Treatment
- Early plantinge2
- Outcome
- growthe2
- Direction
- not differede2
- Qualifier
- in the late stagee2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Pearl Millet (Pennisetum typhoideum Rich)”
e2“Early planting inhibited growth of all genotypes in early stage but not differed in the late stage”
Claim · model-written summary
Growth response of genotypes was significantly caused mainly by the difference of planting date.
- Taxon
- pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
- Material
- genotypese3
- Treatment
- difference of planting datee3
- Outcome
- growth responsee3
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Pearl Millet (Pennisetum typhoideum Rich)”
e3“Significant growth response of genotypes was caused mainly by the difference of planting date”
Claim · model-written summary
Yield and yield component response was significantly caused by differences among genotypes.
- Taxon
- pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
- Material
- genotypese4
- Outcome
- yield and yield componentse4
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Pearl Millet (Pennisetum typhoideum Rich)”
e4“Significant yield and yield components response was caused by the difference of genotypes”
Claim · model-written summary
No significant genotype x planting date interaction was found for growth, yield and yield components.
- Taxon
- pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
- Treatment
- planting datee1
- Outcome
- growth, yield and yield componentse5
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede5
- Qualifier
- G X D interactione5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Pearl Millet (Pennisetum typhoideum Rich)”
e1“Seven genotypes (G), namely G1,G2,G3,G4,G5,G6 and G7 which were selected for yield, seed weight, number of productive panicles, panicle weight, shoot and root length, and the original population were planted in a field at different planting date (D), namely April 29; May 6, May 13 and May 20”
e5“No significant G X D interaction for growth, yield and yield components, except for leaves area was observed”
Claim · model-written summary
A significant genotype x planting date interaction was found for leaf area.
- Taxon
- pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
- Treatment
- planting datee1
- Outcome
- leaves areae6
- Qualifier
- G X D interactione6
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Pearl Millet (Pennisetum typhoideum Rich)”
e1“Seven genotypes (G), namely G1,G2,G3,G4,G5,G6 and G7 which were selected for yield, seed weight, number of productive panicles, panicle weight, shoot and root length, and the original population were planted in a field at different planting date (D), namely April 29; May 6, May 13 and May 20”
e6“No significant G X D interaction for growth, yield and yield components, except for leaves area was observed”
Claim · model-written summary
Genotypes selected for yield, panicle traits were relatively stable across planting dates.
- Taxon
- pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
- Material
- Genotypes selected for yield, number of productive panicles and panicle weighte7
- Treatment
- different planting datee7
- Outcome
- relatively stablee7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Pearl Millet (Pennisetum typhoideum Rich)”
e7“Genotypes selected for yield, number of productive panicles and panicle weight were relatively stable in different planting date”
Claim · model-written summary
Selected genotypes might be adapted for early spring planting.
- Taxon
- pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
- Outcome
- adapted for early spring plantinge7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Pearl Millet (Pennisetum typhoideum Rich)”
e7“Genotypes selected for yield, number of productive panicles and panicle weight were relatively stable in different planting date and might be consider to be adapted for early spring planting”
Claim · model-written summary
Pearl millet shows photoperiod sensitivity and may be a facultative short-day plant.
- Taxon
- pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
- Outcome
- Photoperiod sensitivitye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Photoperiod sensitivity was evidenced and pearl millet might be consider as a facultative shortday plant”
The same questions in other papers
sowing time · growth · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.