Paper · 2016 · PLoS ONE

Root Parameters Show How Management Alters Resource Distribution and Soil Quality in Conventional and Low-Input Cropping Systems in Central Iowa

Patricia A. Lazicki; Matt Liebman; Michelle M. Wander

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
40
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Plant-soil relations may explain why low-external input (LEI) diversified cropping systems are more efficient than their conventional counterparts. This work sought to identify links between management practices, soil quality changes, and root responses in a long-term cropping systems experiment in Iowa where grain yields of 3-year and 4-year LEI rotations have matched or exceeded yield achieved by a 2-year maize (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L.) rotation. The 2-year system was conventionally managed and chisel-ploughed, whereas the 3-year and 4-year systems received plant residues and animal manures and were periodically moldboard ploughed. We expected changes in soil quality to be driven by organic matter inputs, and root growth to reflect spatial and temporal fluctuations in soil quality resulting from those additions. We constructed a carbon budget and measured soil quality indicators (SQIs) and rooting characteristics using samples taken from two depths of all crop-phases of each rotation system on multiple dates. Stocks of particulate organic matter carbon (POM-C) and potentially mineralizable nitrogen (PMN) were greater and more evenly distributed in the LEI than conventional systems. Organic C inputs, which were 58% and 36% greater in the 3-year rotation than in the 4-year and 2-year rotations, respectively, did not account for differences in SQI abundance or distribution. Surprisingly, SQIs did not vary with crop-phase or date. All biochemical SQIs were more stratified (p<0.001) in the conventionally-managed soils. While POM-C and PMN in the top 10 cm were similar in all three systems, stocks in the 10-20 cm depth of the conventional system were less than half the size of those found in the LEI systems. This distribution was mirrored by maize root length density, which was also concentrated in the top 10 cm of the conventionally managed plots and evenly distributed between depths in the LEI systems. The plow-down of organic amendments and manures established meaningful differences in SQIs and extended the rhizosphere of the LEI systems. Resulting efficiencies observed in the LEI grain crops indicate that resource distribution as well as abundance is an important component of soil function that helps explain how LEI systems can maintain similar or greater yields with fewer inputs than achieved by their conventional counterparts.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LEI rotations matched or exceeded conventional rotation grain yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
3-year and 4-year LEI rotationse0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
matched or exceedede0
Comparator
2-year maize (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L.) rotatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“where grain yields of 3-year and 4-year LEI rotations have matched or exceeded yield achieved by a 2-year maize (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L.) rotation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–469 · show in text ↑
e1

“where grain yields of 3-year and 4-year LEI rotations have matched or exceeded yield achieved by a 2-year maize (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L.) rotation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–469 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

POM-C and PMN stocks were greater and more evenly distributed in LEI systems.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
LEIe0
Outcome
Stocks of particulate organic matter carbon (POM-C) and potentially mineralizable nitrogen (PMN)e0
Direction
greater and more evenly distributede0
Comparator
conventional systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stocks of particulate organic matter carbon (POM-C) and potentially mineralizable nitrogen (PMN) were greater and more evenly distributed in the LEI than conventional systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1219 · show in text ↑
e1

“where grain yields of 3-year and 4-year LEI rotations have matched or exceeded yield achieved by a 2-year maize (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L.) rotation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–469 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic carbon inputs were 58% greater in the 3-year than 4-year rotation.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
3-year rotatione0
Outcome
Organic C inputse0
Direction
greatere0
Value
58%e0
Comparator
4-yeare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Organic C inputs, which were 58% and 36% greater in the 3-year rotation than in the 4-year and 2-year rotations, respectively, did not account for differences in SQI abundance or distribution.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1412 · show in text ↑
e1

“where grain yields of 3-year and 4-year LEI rotations have matched or exceeded yield achieved by a 2-year maize (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L.) rotation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–469 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic carbon inputs were 36% greater in the 3-year than 2-year rotation.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
3-year rotatione0
Outcome
Organic C inputse0
Direction
greatere0
Value
36%e0
Comparator
2-yeare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Organic C inputs, which were 58% and 36% greater in the 3-year rotation than in the 4-year and 2-year rotations, respectively, did not account for differences in SQI abundance or distribution.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1412 · show in text ↑
e1

“where grain yields of 3-year and 4-year LEI rotations have matched or exceeded yield achieved by a 2-year maize (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L.) rotation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–469 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic carbon inputs did not account for soil quality indicator abundance or distribution.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Outcome
SQI abundance or distributione0
Qualifier
did not account for differencese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Organic C inputs, which were 58% and 36% greater in the 3-year rotation than in the 4-year and 2-year rotations, respectively, did not account for differences in SQI abundance or distribution.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1412 · show in text ↑
e1

“where grain yields of 3-year and 4-year LEI rotations have matched or exceeded yield achieved by a 2-year maize (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L.) rotation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–469 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil quality indicators did not vary with crop phase or date.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Outcome
SQIse0
Direction
did not varye0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Surprisingly, SQIs did not vary with crop-phase or date.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1469 · show in text ↑
e1

“where grain yields of 3-year and 4-year LEI rotations have matched or exceeded yield achieved by a 2-year maize (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L.) rotation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–469 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochemical soil quality indicators were more stratified in conventional soils.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Outcome
biochemical SQIse0
Direction
more stratifiede0
Setting
conventionally-managed soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All biochemical SQIs were more stratified (p<0.001) in the conventionally-managed soils.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1470–1558 · show in text ↑
e1

“where grain yields of 3-year and 4-year LEI rotations have matched or exceeded yield achieved by a 2-year maize (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L.) rotation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–469 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surface POM-C and PMN were similar across three systems.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Outcome
POM-C and PMNe0
Direction
similare0
Qualifier
top 10 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“While POM-C and PMN in the top 10 cm were similar in all three systems, stocks in the 10-20 cm depth of the conventional system were less than half the size of those found in the LEI systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1559–1750 · show in text ↑
e1

“where grain yields of 3-year and 4-year LEI rotations have matched or exceeded yield achieved by a 2-year maize (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L.) rotation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–469 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional subsurface POM-C and PMN stocks were less than half LEI stocks.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Outcome
stockse0
Direction
less than halfe0
Value
halfe0
Qualifier
10-20 cm depthe0
Comparator
LEI systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“While POM-C and PMN in the top 10 cm were similar in all three systems, stocks in the 10-20 cm depth of the conventional system were less than half the size of those found in the LEI systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1559–1750 · show in text ↑
e1

“where grain yields of 3-year and 4-year LEI rotations have matched or exceeded yield achieved by a 2-year maize (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L.) rotation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–469 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize root length density was concentrated in the top 10 cm of conventional plots.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Outcome
maize root length densitye0
Direction
concentratede0
Qualifier
top 10 cme0
Setting
conventionally managed plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This distribution was mirrored by maize root length density, which was also concentrated in the top 10 cm of the conventionally managed plots and evenly distributed between depths in the LEI systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1751–1950 · show in text ↑
e1

“where grain yields of 3-year and 4-year LEI rotations have matched or exceeded yield achieved by a 2-year maize (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L.) rotation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–469 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize root length density was evenly distributed between depths in LEI systems.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Outcome
maize root length densitye0
Direction
evenly distributede0
Setting
LEI systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This distribution was mirrored by maize root length density, which was also concentrated in the top 10 cm of the conventionally managed plots and evenly distributed between depths in the LEI systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1751–1950 · show in text ↑
e1

“where grain yields of 3-year and 4-year LEI rotations have matched or exceeded yield achieved by a 2-year maize (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L.) rotation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–469 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic amendment and manure incorporation extended the LEI rhizosphere.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
plow-down of organic amendments and manurese0
Outcome
rhizospheree0
Direction
extendede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plow-down of organic amendments and manures established meaningful differences in SQIs and extended the rhizosphere of the LEI systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1951–2090 · show in text ↑
e1

“where grain yields of 3-year and 4-year LEI rotations have matched or exceeded yield achieved by a 2-year maize (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L.) rotation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–469 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors interpret resource distribution and abundance as helping LEI systems sustain comparable or greater yields with fewer inputs.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
similar or greatere0
Qualifier
with fewer inputse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Resulting efficiencies observed in the LEI grain crops indicate that resource distribution as well as abundance is an important component of soil function that helps explain how LEI systems can maintain similar or greater yields with fewer inputs than achieved by their conventional counterparts.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2091–2387 · show in text ↑
e1

“where grain yields of 3-year and 4-year LEI rotations have matched or exceeded yield achieved by a 2-year maize (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L.) rotation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–469 · show in text ↑

rotation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

322 papers: 254 positive, 68 negative or no effect

253 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

318 papers more in this group

See all 322 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.