Abstract
Transplants of angelica ( Angelica archangelica L.), horehound ( Marrubium vulgare L.), and thyme ( Thymus vulgaris L.) were grown in multicompartment trays with five proportions of compost (0%, 15%, 30%, 45%, 60%) mixed to peatmoss and perlite. Plants were fertilized with different electrical conductivity (EC) levels of the nutrient solution (0, 1, and 2 mmho/cm). Horehound and thyme plants were transplanted in the field to measure the residual effects of treatments on dry matter yields and level of active substances. The three medicinal plants showed increased shoot and root dry weights as well as leaf mineral content (some nutrients) when proportion of compost and EC of nutrient solution were higher. The optimal combinations of compost and fertilization treatments on plants growth varied between species. Residual effects of treatments applied in greenhouse on shoot dry matter weight of horehound and thyme plants were observed until the 9th and 12th week, respectively, after transplantation. Treatments also affected active substance levels in horehound plants in field. Organic fertilization management influenced growth, yield in the field and level of certain active substances of the harvested parts of medicinal plants.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Higher compost proportion and nutrient-solution conductivity increased shoot and root dry weights in angelica.
- Treatment
- proportion of compost and EC of nutrient solution were highere0
- Outcome
- shoot and root dry weightse0
- Direction
- increasede0
AngelicaNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The three medicinal plants showed increased shoot and root dry weights as well as leaf mineral content (some nutrients) when proportion of compost and EC of nutrient solution were higher”
e7“Transplants of angelica ( Angelica archangelica L.), horehound ( Marrubium vulgare L.), and thyme ( Thymus vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Higher compost proportion and nutrient-solution conductivity increased shoot and root dry weights in horehound.
- Taxon
- horehounde7
- Treatment
- proportion of compost and EC of nutrient solution were highere0
- Outcome
- shoot and root dry weightse0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“The three medicinal plants showed increased shoot and root dry weights as well as leaf mineral content (some nutrients) when proportion of compost and EC of nutrient solution were higher”
e7“Transplants of angelica ( Angelica archangelica L.), horehound ( Marrubium vulgare L.), and thyme ( Thymus vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Higher compost proportion and nutrient-solution conductivity increased shoot and root dry weights in thyme.
- Taxon
- thyme
.JPG?width=60)
Thymus vulgarise7 - Treatment
- proportion of compost and EC of nutrient solution were highere0
- Outcome
- shoot and root dry weightse0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.JPG?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The three medicinal plants showed increased shoot and root dry weights as well as leaf mineral content (some nutrients) when proportion of compost and EC of nutrient solution were higher”
e7“Transplants of angelica ( Angelica archangelica L.), horehound ( Marrubium vulgare L.), and thyme ( Thymus vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Higher compost proportion and nutrient-solution conductivity increased leaf mineral content in angelica.
- Treatment
- proportion of compost and EC of nutrient solution were highere0
- Outcome
- leaf mineral contente0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- some nutrientse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The three medicinal plants showed increased shoot and root dry weights as well as leaf mineral content (some nutrients) when proportion of compost and EC of nutrient solution were higher”
e7“Transplants of angelica ( Angelica archangelica L.), horehound ( Marrubium vulgare L.), and thyme ( Thymus vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Higher compost proportion and nutrient-solution conductivity increased leaf mineral content in horehound.
- Taxon
- horehounde7
- Treatment
- proportion of compost and EC of nutrient solution were highere0
- Outcome
- leaf mineral contente0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- some nutrientse0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“The three medicinal plants showed increased shoot and root dry weights as well as leaf mineral content (some nutrients) when proportion of compost and EC of nutrient solution were higher”
e7“Transplants of angelica ( Angelica archangelica L.), horehound ( Marrubium vulgare L.), and thyme ( Thymus vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Higher compost proportion and nutrient-solution conductivity increased leaf mineral content in thyme.
- Taxon
- thymeThymus vulgarise7
- Treatment
- proportion of compost and EC of nutrient solution were highere0
- Outcome
- leaf mineral contente0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- some nutrientse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The three medicinal plants showed increased shoot and root dry weights as well as leaf mineral content (some nutrients) when proportion of compost and EC of nutrient solution were higher”
e7“Transplants of angelica ( Angelica archangelica L.), horehound ( Marrubium vulgare L.), and thyme ( Thymus vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The optimal compost and fertilization combinations for growth varied among species.
Verbatim
e0“The optimal combinations of compost and fertilization treatments on plants growth varied between species”
t0“medicinal plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Greenhouse treatments had residual effects on horehound shoot dry matter weight until week 9 after transplanting.
- Taxon
- horehounde0
- Treatment
- treatments applied in greenhousee0
- Outcome
- shoot dry matter weighte0
- Value
- 9the0
- Qualifier
- after transplantatione0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“Residual effects of treatments applied in greenhouse on shoot dry matter weight of horehound and thyme plants were observed until the 9th and 12th week, respectively, after transplantation”
Claim · model-written summary
Greenhouse treatments had residual effects on thyme shoot dry matter weight until week 12 after transplanting.
- Taxon
- thymeThymus vulgarise0
- Treatment
- treatments applied in greenhousee0
- Outcome
- shoot dry matter weighte0
- Value
- 12th weeke0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Residual effects of treatments applied in greenhouse on shoot dry matter weight of horehound and thyme plants were observed until the 9th and 12th week, respectively, after transplantation”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatments affected active substance levels in field-grown horehound.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“Treatments also affected active substance levels in horehound plants in field”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · growth · AngelicaPositive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
fertilization · nutrient: content · Thymus vulgaris (thyme)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
fertilization · growth · Thymus vulgaris (thyme)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.