Paper · 2016 · Research on Crops

Effect of spacing and organics on growth and yield of mothbean genotypes

S. N. O. Sadashivanagowda; S. C. Alagundagi; B. T. Nadagouda

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at College of Agriculture, Bijapur in Northern Dry Zone of Karnataka to study the effect of spacing and organics on growth and yield of mothbean genotypes during kharif 2013. The experiment was laid out in randomized complete block design with factorial concept and replicated thrice. There were 14 treatments including 12 treatment combinations involving three mothbean genotypes (MBS-27, BJMB-1 and Local), two spacings (30 x 10 cm and 45 x 10 cm) and two organics (2.5 t/ha FYM and 1 t/ha vermicompost) along with two controls (local variety at 30 x 10 cm spacing with 10: 20 kg NP/haand local variety at 30 x 10 cm spacing with 10: 20: 10 kg NPK/ha). The local mothbean genotype gave significantly higher seed yield (796 kg/ha) at wider row spacing of 45 x 10 cm compared to 30 x 10 cm. Application of 1 t/ha vermicompost recorded significantly higher seed yield (714 kg/ha) compared to 2.5 t/ha FYM. The interaction of mothbean local variety at spacing of 45 x 10 cm with application of 2.5 t/ha FYM produced significantly higher seed yield (983 kg/ha), seeds per pod (7.36), pods per plant (78.73), total dry matter at 30, 50 and 70 DAS (2.25, 12.00 and 30.45 g/plant, respectively), branches per plant (8.73), plant height (90.8 cm) compared to other treatment combinations. It can be concluded that for dry land situation, local mothbean genotype can be recommended at a spacing of 45 x 10 cm with 2.5 t/ha FYM application.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The local mothbean genotype gave higher seed yield at 45 x 10 cm spacing than at 30 x 10 cm spacing.

Material
local mothbean genotypee1
Treatment
wider row spacing of 45 x 10 cme1
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
796 kg/hae1
Comparator
30 x 10 cme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna aconitifolia
Vigna aconitifolia · TaxonLalitstar at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mothbean genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“The local mothbean genotype gave significantly higher seed yield (796 kg/ha) at wider row spacing of 45 x 10 cm compared to 30 x 10 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–822 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 1 t/ha vermicompost gave higher seed yield than 2.5 t/ha FYM.

Treatment
1 t/ha vermicomposte2
Outcome
seed yielde2
Direction
highere2
Value
714 kg/hae2
Comparator
2.5 t/ha FYMe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna aconitifolia
Vigna aconitifolia · TaxonLalitstar at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mothbean genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–72 · show in text ↑
e2

“Application of 1 t/ha vermicompost recorded significantly higher seed yield (714 kg/ha) compared to 2.5 t/ha FYM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–936 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The local variety at 45 x 10 cm spacing with 2.5 t/ha FYM gave higher seed yield than other treatment combinations.

Material
local varietye3
Treatment
2.5 t/ha FYMe3
Outcome
seed yielde3
Direction
highere3
Value
983 kg/hae3
Qualifier
at spacing of 45 x 10 cme3
Comparator
other treatment combinationse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna aconitifolia
Vigna aconitifolia · TaxonLalitstar at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mothbean genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–72 · show in text ↑
e3

“The interaction of mothbean local variety at spacing of 45 x 10 cm with application of 2.5 t/ha FYM produced significantly higher seed yield (983 kg/ha), seeds per pod (7.36), pods per plant (78.73), total dry matter at 30, 50 and 70 DAS (2.25, 12.00 and 30.45 g/plant, respectively), branches per plant (8.73), plant height (90.8 cm) compared to other treatment combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1313 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The local variety at 45 x 10 cm spacing with 2.5 t/ha FYM gave higher seeds per pod than other treatment combinations.

Treatment
2.5 t/ha FYMe3
Outcome
seeds per pode3
Direction
higherinferrede3
Value
7.36e3
Comparator
other treatment combinationse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna aconitifolia
Vigna aconitifolia · TaxonLalitstar at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mothbean genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–72 · show in text ↑
e3

“The interaction of mothbean local variety at spacing of 45 x 10 cm with application of 2.5 t/ha FYM produced significantly higher seed yield (983 kg/ha), seeds per pod (7.36), pods per plant (78.73), total dry matter at 30, 50 and 70 DAS (2.25, 12.00 and 30.45 g/plant, respectively), branches per plant (8.73), plant height (90.8 cm) compared to other treatment combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1313 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The local variety at 45 x 10 cm spacing with 2.5 t/ha FYM gave higher pods per plant than other treatment combinations.

Treatment
2.5 t/ha FYMe3
Outcome
pods per plante3
Direction
higherinferrede3
Value
78.73e3
Comparator
other treatment combinationse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna aconitifolia
Vigna aconitifolia · TaxonLalitstar at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mothbean genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–72 · show in text ↑
e3

“The interaction of mothbean local variety at spacing of 45 x 10 cm with application of 2.5 t/ha FYM produced significantly higher seed yield (983 kg/ha), seeds per pod (7.36), pods per plant (78.73), total dry matter at 30, 50 and 70 DAS (2.25, 12.00 and 30.45 g/plant, respectively), branches per plant (8.73), plant height (90.8 cm) compared to other treatment combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1313 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The local variety at 45 x 10 cm spacing with 2.5 t/ha FYM gave higher total dry matter than other treatment combinations.

Treatment
2.5 t/ha FYMe3
Outcome
total dry matter at 30, 50 and 70 DASe3
Direction
higherinferrede3
Value
2.25, 12.00 and 30.45 g/plante3
Comparator
other treatment combinationse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna aconitifolia
Vigna aconitifolia · TaxonLalitstar at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mothbean genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–72 · show in text ↑
e3

“The interaction of mothbean local variety at spacing of 45 x 10 cm with application of 2.5 t/ha FYM produced significantly higher seed yield (983 kg/ha), seeds per pod (7.36), pods per plant (78.73), total dry matter at 30, 50 and 70 DAS (2.25, 12.00 and 30.45 g/plant, respectively), branches per plant (8.73), plant height (90.8 cm) compared to other treatment combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1313 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The local variety at 45 x 10 cm spacing with 2.5 t/ha FYM gave more branches per plant than other treatment combinations.

Treatment
2.5 t/ha FYMe3
Outcome
branches per plante3
Direction
higherinferrede3
Value
8.73e3
Comparator
other treatment combinationse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna aconitifolia
Vigna aconitifolia · TaxonLalitstar at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mothbean genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–72 · show in text ↑
e3

“The interaction of mothbean local variety at spacing of 45 x 10 cm with application of 2.5 t/ha FYM produced significantly higher seed yield (983 kg/ha), seeds per pod (7.36), pods per plant (78.73), total dry matter at 30, 50 and 70 DAS (2.25, 12.00 and 30.45 g/plant, respectively), branches per plant (8.73), plant height (90.8 cm) compared to other treatment combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1313 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The local variety at 45 x 10 cm spacing with 2.5 t/ha FYM gave greater plant height than other treatment combinations.

Treatment
2.5 t/ha FYMe3
Outcome
plant heighte3
Direction
higherinferrede3
Value
90.8 cme3
Comparator
other treatment combinationse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna aconitifolia
Vigna aconitifolia · TaxonLalitstar at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mothbean genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–72 · show in text ↑
e3

“The interaction of mothbean local variety at spacing of 45 x 10 cm with application of 2.5 t/ha FYM produced significantly higher seed yield (983 kg/ha), seeds per pod (7.36), pods per plant (78.73), total dry matter at 30, 50 and 70 DAS (2.25, 12.00 and 30.45 g/plant, respectively), branches per plant (8.73), plant height (90.8 cm) compared to other treatment combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1313 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

For dryland conditions, the local mothbean genotype can be recommended at 45 x 10 cm spacing with 2.5 t/ha FYM.

Material
local mothbean genotypee4
Outcome
can be recommended at a spacing of 45 x 10 cm with 2.5 t/ha FYM applicatione4
Setting
dry land situatione4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna aconitifolia
Vigna aconitifolia · TaxonLalitstar at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mothbean genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–72 · show in text ↑
e4

“It can be concluded that for dry land situation, local mothbean genotype can be recommended at a spacing of 45 x 10 cm with 2.5 t/ha FYM application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1315–1463 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Vigna aconitifolia (moth-bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

density · yield · Vigna aconitifolia (moth-bean)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna aconitifolia (moth-bean)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.