Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during the Kharif season of 2013 at vegetable research farm of Department of Horticulture, Allahabad School of Agriculture, Sam Higginbottom Institute of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh to evaluate the integrated nutrient management in okra, Abelmoschus esculentus (L) Moench in randomized block design with three replications and ten treatments. Two organic sources of nutrition viz vermicompost and Biogen were combined with NPK fertilizers and the performance was compared with the sole chemical fertilization. Among 10 treatments under study 75 per cent RDF + 25 per cent vermicompost + Biogen recorded maximum values for TSS (2.71%) and fiber content (1.75 g), minimum incidence of yellow vein mosaic virus effect, maximum total yield per hectare (46.09 q), net return per hectare (Rs 76915.75) and cost/benefit ratio (1:3.00). This study suggested that 75 per cent RDF + 25 per cent vermicompost + Biogen treatment is potential source for fruit quality and economics of okra.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
The combined nutrient treatment produced maximum TSS of 2.71%.
- Taxon
- okra
.jpg?width=60)
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- 75 per cent RDF + 25 per cent vermicompost + Biogene0
- Outcome
- TSSe0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 2.71%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“75 per cent RDF + 25 per cent vermicompost + Biogen recorded maximum values for TSS (2.71%) and fiber content (1.75 g)”
t0“okra”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined nutrient treatment produced maximum fiber content of 1.75 g.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- 75 per cent RDF + 25 per cent vermicompost + Biogene0
- Outcome
- fiber contente0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 1.75 ge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“75 per cent RDF + 25 per cent vermicompost + Biogen recorded maximum values for TSS (2.71%) and fiber content (1.75 g)”
t0“okra”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined nutrient treatment minimized yellow vein mosaic virus incidence.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- 75 per cent RDF + 25 per cent vermicompost + Biogene0
- Interactor
- yellow vein mosaic virusYellow vein mosaic viruse0pathogen
- Outcome
- incidence of yellow vein mosaic virus effecte0
- Direction
- minimume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“75 per cent RDF + 25 per cent vermicompost + Biogen recorded maximum values for TSS (2.71%) and fiber content (1.75 g), minimum incidence of yellow vein mosaic virus effect”
t0“okra”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined nutrient treatment produced maximum yield of 46.09 q per hectare.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- 75 per cent RDF + 25 per cent vermicompost + Biogene0
- Outcome
- total yield per hectaree1
- Direction
- maximume1
- Value
- 46.09 qe1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“75 per cent RDF + 25 per cent vermicompost + Biogen recorded”
e1“maximum total yield per hectare (46.09 q), net return per hectare (Rs 76915.75) and cost/benefit ratio (1:3.00)”
t0“okra”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined nutrient treatment produced maximum net return of Rs 76915.75 per hectare.
- Treatment
- 75 per cent RDF + 25 per cent vermicompost + Biogene0
- Outcome
- net return per hectaree1
- Direction
- maximume1
- Value
- Rs 76915.75e1
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“75 per cent RDF + 25 per cent vermicompost + Biogen recorded”
e1“maximum total yield per hectare (46.09 q), net return per hectare (Rs 76915.75) and cost/benefit ratio (1:3.00)”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined nutrient treatment produced maximum cost/benefit ratio of 1:3.00.
- Treatment
- 75 per cent RDF + 25 per cent vermicompost + Biogene0
- Outcome
- cost/benefit ratioe1
- Direction
- maximume1
- Value
- 1:3.00e1
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“75 per cent RDF + 25 per cent vermicompost + Biogen recorded”
e1“maximum total yield per hectare (46.09 q), net return per hectare (Rs 76915.75) and cost/benefit ratio (1:3.00)”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend the combined nutrient treatment as a potential source for okra fruit quality and economics.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse0
- Outcome
- 75 per cent RDF + 25 per cent vermicompost + Biogen treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“This study suggested that 75 per cent RDF + 25 per cent vermicompost + Biogen treatment is potential source for fruit quality and economics of okra.”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →fertilization · quality: grain · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →fertilization · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
354 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
369 papers more in this group
See all 373 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.