Paper · 2016 · Scholarship@Western (Western University)

Evaluating the interaction between buckwheat, Fagopyrum esculentum (Polygonaceae) and wireworm Agriotes sputator L. (Coleoptera: Elateridae)

Yeritza L Bohorquez

5
claims
7
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Laboratory experiments were carried out to determine if buckwheat, Fagopyrum esculentum, produces phytochemicals that act as deterrents, anti-feedants, or toxins against Agriotes sputator wireworms. Choice assays were conducted to test the attractiveness of germinating, branching and flowering buckwheat, red spring wheat (Triticum spp) and island barley (Hordeum vulgare) to the larvae. There was no evidence that the wireworms were deterred by buckwheat and the germinating stage of all three crops was the most attractive. Twenty-one day, no choice feeding assays were conducted to determine change in mass and mortality of A. sputator larvae when fed buckwheat or barley; no differences between hosts were observed. However, while wireworm herbivory significantly reduced the growth of barley, it did not affect buckwheat, suggesting that this species may produce anti-feedants. Longer feeding assays and field trials are required to confirm this possibility.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wireworms were not deterred by buckwheat.

Taxon
buckwheate0
Interactor
wirewormse0pest
Outcome
wireworms were deterrede0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“There was no evidence that the wireworms were deterred by buckwheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–456 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Germinating plants of all three tested crops were most attractive to wireworms.

Taxon
buckwheatt0
Organ / stage
germinating stagee0
Interactor
wirewormt0pest
Outcome
most attractivee0
Direction
most attractivee0

Verbatim

e0

“the germinating stage of all three crops was the most attractive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–525 · show in text ↑
t0

“buckwheat, Fagopyrum esculentum (Polygonaceae) and wireworm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–94 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wireworm mass change and mortality did not differ between buckwheat and barley hosts.

Taxon
buckwheatt0
Outcome
no differences between hostse0
Direction
no differencese0
Comparator
hostse0

Not reportedInteractor

Verbatim

e0

“no differences between hosts were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–719 · show in text ↑
t0

“buckwheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wireworm herbivory significantly reduced barley growth.

Treatment
wireworm herbivorye0
Interactor
wireworme0pest
Outcome
growth of barleye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wireworm herbivory significantly reduced the growth of barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–797 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wireworm herbivory did not affect buckwheat growth.

Taxon
buckwheate0
Treatment
ite0
Outcome
buckwheate0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“it did not affect buckwheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–826 · show in text ↑

grazing · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.