Paper · 2007

Field evaluation of comparative efficacy of dusts and emulsifiable concentration formulations against gram pod borer in chickpea ecosystem

D. K. S. Gowda; B. V. Patil; S. Yelsetty

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Among the different emulsifiable concentrations and dusts evaluated for their efficacy against pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera(Hubner), in rainfed chickpea ecosystem. Chlorpyriphos 20EC @ 250 g a.i./ha was found to be highly effective compared to other insecticides in reducing pod damage and recorded significantly higher good pods per plant and grain yield.The commonly used dust fenvalerate 0.4D @ 100 g a.i./ha recorded lower grain yield. The results on the cost economics of different insecticids revealed that, in general EC formulations recorded highest net profit and C.B. ratio compared to dusts. The highest net profit of Rs.13175.5 per ha and Benefit Cost ratio of 4.23, was recorded from chlorpyriphos 20 EC@ 250 g a.i./ha compared to other insecticides

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorpyriphos 20EC at 250 g a.i./ha was more effective than other insecticides in reducing pod damage by pod borer in rainfed chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Chlorpyriphos 20EC @ 250 g a.i./hae0
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae1pest
Outcome
pod damagee0
Direction
reducinge0
Comparator
other insecticidese0
Setting
rainfed chickpea ecosysteme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorpyriphos 20EC @ 250 g a.i./ha was found to be highly effective compared to other insecticides in reducing pod damage and recorded significantly higher good pods per plant and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–358 · show in text ↑
e1

“efficacy against pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera(Hubner), in rainfed chickpea ecosystem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 78–165 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea ecosystem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorpyriphos 20EC gave significantly more good pods per plant and higher grain yield than other insecticides.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Chlorpyriphos 20EC @ 250 g a.i./hae0
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae1pest
Outcome
good pods per plant and grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other insecticidese0
Setting
rainfed chickpea ecosysteme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorpyriphos 20EC @ 250 g a.i./ha was found to be highly effective compared to other insecticides in reducing pod damage and recorded significantly higher good pods per plant and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–358 · show in text ↑
e1

“efficacy against pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera(Hubner), in rainfed chickpea ecosystem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 78–165 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea ecosystem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The commonly used dust fenvalerate 0.4D at 100 g a.i./ha gave lower grain yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
fenvalerate 0.4D @ 100 g a.i./hae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The commonly used dust fenvalerate 0.4D @ 100 g a.i./ha recorded lower grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–441 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea ecosystem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EC formulations generally recorded higher net profit and cost-benefit ratio than dusts.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
EC formulationse0
Outcome
net profit and C.B. ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
dustse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in general EC formulations recorded highest net profit and C.B. ratio compared to dusts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–604 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea ecosystem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorpyriphos 20 EC at 250 g a.i./ha gave the highest net profit, Rs.13175.5 per ha.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
chlorpyriphos 20 EC@ 250 g a.i./hae0
Outcome
net profite0
Direction
higheste0
Value
Rs.13175.5 per hae0
Comparator
other insecticidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest net profit of Rs.13175.5 per ha and Benefit Cost ratio of 4.23, was recorded from chlorpyriphos 20 EC@ 250 g a.i./ha compared to other insecticides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–765 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea ecosystem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorpyriphos 20 EC at 250 g a.i./ha gave the highest benefit cost ratio, 4.23.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
chlorpyriphos 20 EC@ 250 g a.i./hae0
Outcome
Benefit Cost ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4.23e0
Comparator
other insecticidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest net profit of Rs.13175.5 per ha and Benefit Cost ratio of 4.23, was recorded from chlorpyriphos 20 EC@ 250 g a.i./ha compared to other insecticides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–765 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea ecosystem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–138 · show in text ↑

fenvalerate · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

chlorpyrifos · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

chlorpyrifos · Helicoverpa armigera · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.