Paper · 2016 · Australian Journal of Crop Science

Flowering synchronization in hybrid rice parental lines

Vitor Henrique Vaz Mondo; Adriano Stephan Nascente; Péricles de Carvalho Ferreira Neves; et al.

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

The cultivation of hybrid rice is a technology that allows for an increase in grain yield of 30% relative to the grain yield of conventional cultivars. However, the main challenge for this technology is related to seed production, which has high production costs and low seed yields. Therefore, agronomic techniques that could enhance flowering synchrony of parental lines in the field are essential for an efficient production system of hybrid rice seeds. The objective of this work was to study the effects of sowing depth, plant density and fertilization with nitrogen or phosphorus as potential techniques to increase the pollen availability in the field and, consequently, the flowering synchrony between parental lines in the production of hybrid rice seeds. The experiments were conducted during two growing seasons in the Central Region of Brazil. All of the experiments were conducted as a randomized complete block in a split plot scheme; however, the experiment with P fertilization had a factorial design. Our research allow inferring that nitrogen fertilization technique applied to the soil or foliar at the time of panicle differentiation does not affect the time of onset of flowering of rice varieties INTA Puitá CL and L106R, which are potential R lines for the production of hybrid rice. Agronomic techniques of variation in sowing depth, seeding rate and the phosphate fertilization affect the time of onset of flowering from 10 to 19 degree-days, which could represent two days in the crop cycle, for the line L106R. Such techniques constitute potential alternatives for use in hybrid rice seed production systems and could be applied in alternated blocks of R lines in the field to obtain longer periods of pollen availability in the field.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil or foliar nitrogen at panicle differentiation did not change flowering onset of INTA Puitá CL.

Material
INTA Puitá CLe0
Treatment
nitrogen fertilizatione0
Outcome
time of onset of floweringe0
Direction
does not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen fertilization technique applied to the soil or foliar at the time of panicle differentiation does not affect the time of onset of flowering of rice varieties INTA Puitá CL and L106R”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1242 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil or foliar nitrogen at panicle differentiation did not change flowering onset of L106R.

Material
L106Re0
Treatment
nitrogen fertilizatione0
Outcome
time of onset of floweringe0
Direction
does not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen fertilization technique applied to the soil or foliar at the time of panicle differentiation does not affect the time of onset of flowering of rice varieties INTA Puitá CL and L106R”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1242 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing depth variation changed L106R flowering onset by 10 to 19 degree-days.

Material
L106Re0
Treatment
variation in sowing depthe0
Outcome
time of onset of floweringe0
Direction
affecte0
Value
10 to 19 degree-dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“variation in sowing depth, seeding rate and the phosphate fertilization affect the time of onset of flowering from 10 to 19 degree-days, which could represent two days in the crop cycle, for the line L106R.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1537 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeding rate variation changed L106R flowering onset by 10 to 19 degree-days.

Material
L106Re0
Treatment
seeding ratee0
Outcome
time of onset of floweringe0
Direction
affecte0
Value
10 to 19 degree-dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“variation in sowing depth, seeding rate and the phosphate fertilization affect the time of onset of flowering from 10 to 19 degree-days, which could represent two days in the crop cycle, for the line L106R.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1537 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphate fertilization changed L106R flowering onset by 10 to 19 degree-days.

Material
L106Re0
Treatment
phosphate fertilizatione0
Outcome
time of onset of floweringe0
Direction
affecte0
Value
10 to 19 degree-dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“variation in sowing depth, seeding rate and the phosphate fertilization affect the time of onset of flowering from 10 to 19 degree-days, which could represent two days in the crop cycle, for the line L106R.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1537 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–40 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose alternating R-line blocks with these techniques to extend field pollen availability.

Material
R linese0
Treatment
alternated blocks of R linese0
Outcome
longer periods of pollen availability in the fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Such techniques constitute potential alternatives for use in hybrid rice seed production systems and could be applied in alternated blocks of R lines in the field to obtain longer periods of pollen availability in the field.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1538–1762 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–40 · show in text ↑

fertilization · phenology · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 17 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.