Paper · 2016 · International Journal of Vegetable Science

Postharvest UV-C Irradiation Delays Senescence and Maintains Nutritional Properties of Broccoli Florets

Fariba Khalili; Maryam Shekarchi; Khadije Razavi; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Health promoting bioactive compounds in broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. var. italica) florets decrease in nutritional value after harvest. Ultraviolet (UV)-C radiation (254 nm) is a physical technology to extend postharvest life of vegetables. Broccoli florets from cv. Premium Crop, were treated with 0 m−2·s−1 (control), 1.5, 4.5, or 10 kJ·m−2·s−1 of UV-C and subsequently stored at 4°C for 12 days. All treatments increased total polyphenols content and increased up to 21% above the initial value during storage. The higher the UV-C dose, the higher the total antioxidant capacity values that were reached. Generally total chlorophyll content decreased, but higher chlorophyll retention was when broccoli florets were radiated with 4.5 and 10 kJ·m−2·s−1 of UV-C. Treatment with UV-C of 10 kJ·m−2·s−1 caused the highest retention of sugar. Decreasing protein content in broccoli florets during storage occurred but samples treated with 4.5 and 10 kJ·m−2·s−1 had higher protein contents. UV-C treatment is a nonchemical technique to delay senescence and preserve quality and nutritional value of broccoli up to 12 days at 4°C.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All UV-C treatments increased broccoli floret total polyphenols by up to 21% above the initial value during storage.

Material
Premium Crope1
Treatment
UV-Ce1
Outcome
total polyphenols contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
21%e0
Comparator
initial valuee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All treatments increased total polyphenols content and increased up to 21% above the initial value during storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–514 · show in text ↑
e1

“Broccoli florets from cv. Premium Crop, were treated with 0 m−2·s−1 (control), 1.5, 4.5, or 10 kJ·m−2·s−1 of UV-C and subsequently stored at 4°C for 12 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 243–399 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher UV-C doses yielded higher total antioxidant capacity.

Treatment
UV-C dosee0
Outcome
total antioxidant capacitye0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The higher the UV-C dose, the higher the total antioxidant capacity values that were reached”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–608 · show in text ↑
e1

“broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. var. italica) florets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total chlorophyll generally decreased during storage.

Outcome
total chlorophyll contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Generally total chlorophyll content decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–655 · show in text ↑
e1

“broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. var. italica) florets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 4.5 kJ·m−2·s−1 UV-C dose improved chlorophyll retention.

Treatment
4.5e0
Outcome
chlorophyll retentione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher chlorophyll retention was when broccoli florets were radiated with 4.5 and 10 kJ·m−2·s−1 of UV-C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–764 · show in text ↑
e1

“0 m−2·s−1 (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–320 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 10 kJ·m−2·s−1 UV-C dose improved chlorophyll retention.

Treatment
10 kJ·m−2·s−1 of UV-Ce0
Outcome
chlorophyll retentione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher chlorophyll retention was when broccoli florets were radiated with 4.5 and 10 kJ·m−2·s−1 of UV-C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–764 · show in text ↑
e1

“0 m−2·s−1 (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–320 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 10 kJ·m−2·s−1 UV-C dose gave the highest sugar retention.

Treatment
UV-C of 10 kJ·m−2·s−1e0
Outcome
retention of sugare0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment with UV-C of 10 kJ·m−2·s−1 caused the highest retention of sugar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–840 · show in text ↑
e1

“broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. var. italica) florets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein content decreased during broccoli storage.

Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
Decreasinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Decreasing protein content in broccoli florets during storage occurred”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–912 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 4.5 kJ·m−2·s−1 UV-C dose maintained higher broccoli protein content.

Treatment
4.5e0
Outcome
protein contentse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“samples treated with 4.5 and 10 kJ·m−2·s−1 had higher protein contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–987 · show in text ↑
e1

“Decreasing protein content in broccoli florets during storage occurred”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–912 · show in text ↑
e2

“0 m−2·s−1 (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–320 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 10 kJ·m−2·s−1 UV-C dose maintained higher broccoli protein content.

Treatment
10 kJ·m−2·s−1e0
Outcome
protein contentse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“samples treated with 4.5 and 10 kJ·m−2·s−1 had higher protein contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–987 · show in text ↑
e1

“Decreasing protein content in broccoli florets during storage occurred”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–912 · show in text ↑
e2

“0 m−2·s−1 (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–320 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that UV-C can delay senescence and preserve broccoli quality for up to 12 days at 4°C.

Outcome
delay senescence and preserve quality and nutritional valuee0
Value
12 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UV-C treatment is a nonchemical technique to delay senescence and preserve quality and nutritional value of broccoli up to 12 days at 4°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1126 · show in text ↑

uv · physiology: pigments · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

uv · quality: phytochemicals · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

23 papers: 23 positive, 0 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.