Paper · 2015 · Annals of Agricultural Research

Impact of biofertilizer and irrigation in enhancing productivity potential of linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) under utera condition

Shreeja Acharya; R. B. P. Nirala

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during rabi 2012-13 and 2013-14 at Agricultural Research Institute, Patna, Bihar to study the effect of biofertilizer viz., Phosphate Solubilising Bacteria, Azotobacter and irrigation in enhancing productivity potential of linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) under utera condition. Utera linseed responded significantly to the irrigation treatments with highest yield recorded under two irrigations, where as the percentage increase in yield was found higher for one irrigation over no irrigation. All the fertility treatments showed significant increase in seed yield with respect to control during both the years. The treatment, 100% recommended dose of nitrogen and seed inoculation with PSB and Azotobacter significantly out yielded other treatments during both the year of experimentation. The interaction effect also revealed significant increase in seed yield with respect to irrigation and fertility, with highest yield of 1074 kg/ha and 844 kg/ha recorded under two irrigations along with application of 100% RDN + PSB and Azotobacter during 2012-13 and 2013-14 respectively. The percentage increase in yield by 100% RDN + PSB and Azotobacter, over the control fertility treatments, was found higher when applied with one irrigation with values of 132% and 113% during 2012-13 and 2013-14 respectively. The highest net return and B:C ratio was recorded for two irrigations with 100% RDN + PSB and Azotobacter, followed by one irrigation with 100% RDN + PSB and Azotobacter.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two irrigations produced the highest linseed yield.

Taxon
linseede0
Treatment
two irrigationse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Setting
Uterae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Utera linseed responded significantly to the irrigation treatments with highest yield recorded under two irrigations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–428 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One irrigation increased yield by a greater percentage than no irrigation.

Taxon
linseedt0
Treatment
one irrigatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
no irrigatione0

Verbatim

e0

“the percentage increase in yield was found higher for one irrigation over no irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–526 · show in text ↑
t0

“linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All fertility treatments increased seed yield relative to control in both years.

Taxon
linseedt0
Treatment
fertility treatmentse0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
both the yearse0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“All the fertility treatments showed significant increase in seed yield with respect to control during both the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–644 · show in text ↑
t0

“linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended nitrogen plus PSB and Azotobacter inoculation outyielded other treatments in both years.

Taxon
linseedt0
Treatment
100% recommended dose of nitrogen and seed inoculation with PSB and Azotobactere0
Interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Second interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
yieldede0
Direction
out yieldede0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“100% recommended dose of nitrogen and seed inoculation with PSB and Azotobacter significantly out yielded other treatments during both the year of experimentation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–823 · show in text ↑
t0

“linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two irrigations with nitrogen and inoculants yielded 1074 kg/ha in 2012-13.

Taxon
linseedt0
Treatment
two irrigations along with application of 100% RDN + PSB and Azotobactere0
Interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Second interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1074 kg/hae0
Qualifier
2012-13e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest yield of 1074 kg/ha and 844 kg/ha recorded under two irrigations along with application of 100% RDN + PSB and Azotobacter during 2012-13 and 2013-14 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1113 · show in text ↑
t0

“linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two irrigations with nitrogen and inoculants yielded 844 kg/ha in 2013-14.

Taxon
linseedt0
Treatment
two irrigations along with application of 100% RDN + PSB and Azotobactere0
Interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Second interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
844 kg/hae0
Qualifier
2013-14e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest yield of 1074 kg/ha and 844 kg/ha recorded under two irrigations along with application of 100% RDN + PSB and Azotobacter during 2012-13 and 2013-14 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1113 · show in text ↑
t0

“linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under one irrigation, nitrogen and inoculants increased yield 132% over fertility control in 2012-13.

Taxon
linseedt0
Treatment
100% RDN + PSB and Azotobactere0
Interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Second interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
132%e0
Qualifier
one irrigatione0
Comparator
control fertility treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“percentage increase in yield by 100% RDN + PSB and Azotobacter, over the control fertility treatments, was found higher when applied with one irrigation with values of 132% and 113% during 2012-13 and 2013-14 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1340 · show in text ↑
t0

“linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under one irrigation, nitrogen and inoculants increased yield 113% over fertility control in 2013-14.

Taxon
linseedt0
Treatment
100% RDN + PSB and Azotobactere0
Interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Second interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
113%e0
Qualifier
2013-14e0
Comparator
control fertility treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“percentage increase in yield by 100% RDN + PSB and Azotobacter, over the control fertility treatments, was found higher when applied with one irrigation with values of 132% and 113% during 2012-13 and 2013-14 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1340 · show in text ↑
t0

“linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two irrigations with nitrogen and inoculants gave the highest net return and benefit cost ratio.

Taxon
linseedt0
Treatment
two irrigations with 100% RDN + PSB and Azotobactere0
Interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Second interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
net return and B:C ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
one irrigation with 100% RDN + PSB and Azotobactere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest net return and B:C ratio was recorded for two irrigations with 100% RDN + PSB and Azotobacter, followed by one irrigation with 100% RDN + PSB and Azotobacter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1346–1511 · show in text ↑
t0

“linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–110 · show in text ↑

Azotobacter · yield · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Results differ

61 papers: 59 positive, 2 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

inoculation · yield · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

irrigation · yield · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 25 positive, 3 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.