Paper · 2015 · Agronomy Journal

Polymer‐Coated Tablet Urea Improved Rice Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency

Xiaoxiao Lyu; Yuechao Yang; Yuncong Li; et al.

7
claims
11
verbatim quotes
35
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The high cost of coating materials prevents the wide use of controlled release urea (CRU). A large size polymer‐coated tablet urea (PCTU) can be produced with <30% of coating materials used for traditional size of CRUs. The objective of this experiment was to evaluate the effects of a PCTU produced in our laboratory on root growth, grain yield, and N use efficiency on rice ( Oryza sativa L.) grown in a silt loam soil during two growing seasons. The PCTU, regular CRU and urea formaldehyde (UF) were applied into the soil one time before transplanting at the rate of 0.93 g N pot −1 , while the conventional urea (U) treatment was applied three times in the tillering (40%), jointing (30%), and heading stages (30%). The results showed that the PCTU treatment produced higher root vigor, peroxidase activity, and yield of rice than the U treatment. There was no significant difference in plant height, SPAD value, growth indexes of plant shoot and root of rice among the PCTU and U treatments in the rice tillering stage, but splitting applications of U at tillering, jointing, and heading stages costs more for labor and machinery than applying once for PCTU. The PCTU treatment increased the yield of grain and total N use efficiency more than the U, CRU, and UF treatments did, but the UF treatment produced the highest yield and N use efficiency of straw.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PCTU increased rice root vigor and peroxidase activity relative to conventional urea.

Treatment
PCTU treatmente0
Outcome
root vigor, peroxidase activitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
U treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the PCTU treatment produced higher root vigor, peroxidase activity, and yield of rice than the U treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–851 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PCTU produced higher rice yield than conventional urea.

Treatment
PCTU treatmente0
Outcome
yield of ricee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
U treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the PCTU treatment produced higher root vigor, peroxidase activity, and yield of rice than the U treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–851 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At tillering, PCTU and conventional urea did not differ significantly in height, SPAD value or shoot and root growth indexes.

Organ / stage
rice tillering stagee0
Treatment
PCTUe0
Outcome
plant height, SPAD value, growth indexes of plant shoot and roote0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
U treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no significant difference in plant height, SPAD value, growth indexes of plant shoot and root of rice among the PCTU and U treatments in the rice tillering stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–1023 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Split conventional urea applications required more labor and machinery cost than a single PCTU application.

Outcome
labor and machinerye0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
PCTUe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“splitting applications of U at tillering, jointing, and heading stages costs more for labor and machinery than applying once for PCTU.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1163 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PCTU increased grain yield more than U, CRU and UF.

Treatment
PCTU treatmente0
Outcome
yield of graine0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
U, CRU, and UF treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The PCTU treatment increased the yield of grain and total N use efficiency more than the U, CRU, and UF treatments did”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1282 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PCTU increased total nitrogen use efficiency more than U, CRU and UF.

Treatment
PCTU treatmente0
Outcome
total N use efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
U, CRU, and UF treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The PCTU treatment increased the yield of grain and total N use efficiency more than the U, CRU, and UF treatments did”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1282 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UF gave the highest straw yield and nitrogen use efficiency.

Treatment
UF treatmente0
Outcome
yield and N use efficiency of strawe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the UF treatment produced the highest yield and N use efficiency of straw.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1288–1362 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–40 · show in text ↑

formaldehyde · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: pigments · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

85 papers: 73 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 73 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 16 positive, 4 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

262 papers: 217 positive, 45 negative or no effect

216 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

258 papers more in this group

See all 262 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.