Paper · 2016 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Effect of colored plastic mulch on growth, yield and nutrient status in cucumber under shade house and open field conditions

Vicente Torres-Olivar; Luis Alonso Valdez-Aguilar; Antonio Cárdenas-Flores; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The aim of this study was to realize whether soil mulching, with different plastic mulch colors, is a suitable practice under shade house (SH) conditions for the culture of cucumber. To do so, cucumber was cultured mulched or not with black, blue, red or white-on-black plastic films under SH, and contrasted against mulched cucumber in open field (OF). Red mulch produced the highest shoot dry weight per plant and bare soil the lowest. However, it was the white mulch which produced the highest commercial yield per plant. Contrastingly, bare soil plants produced the lowest commercial yield. SH plants two folded photosynthetic rates compared to OF plants. Mulch color mainly impacted leaf phosphorus (P) and magnesium (Mg) content while the SH affected nitrogen (K), calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg). Our results confirm that soil mulching, and shading positively impact the cucumber yield and quality but also show that soil mulching under SH enhances cucumber crop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red mulch gave the highest shoot dry weight and bare soil the lowest.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Red mulche0
Outcome
shoot dry weight per plante0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
bare soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Red mulch produced the highest shoot dry weight per plant and bare soil the lowest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–436 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

White mulch gave the highest commercial yield per plant.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
white mulche0
Outcome
commercial yield per plante0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the white mulch which produced the highest commercial yield per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–523 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bare soil plants had the lowest commercial yield.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
bare soile0
Outcome
commercial yielde0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bare soil plants produced the lowest commercial yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–593 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade house plants had twice the photosynthetic rate of open field plants.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
SHe0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratese0
Direction
two foldede0
Comparator
OFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SH plants two folded photosynthetic rates compared to OF plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–658 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch color primarily affected leaf phosphorus and magnesium content.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Mulch colore0
Outcome
leaf phosphorus (P) and magnesium (Mg) contente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mulch color mainly impacted leaf phosphorus (P) and magnesium (Mg) content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–734 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade house conditions affected nitrogen, calcium and magnesium content.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
SHe0
Outcome
nitrogen (K), calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the SH affected nitrogen (K), calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–802 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching and shading improved cucumber yield and quality.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
soil mulching, and shadinge0
Outcome
cucumber yield and qualitye0
Direction
positively impacte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil mulching, and shading positively impact the cucumber yield and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–904 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results differ

58 papers: 50 positive, 8 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

54 papers more in this group

See all 58 papers →

mulching · quality: general · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

mulching · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 17 positive, 3 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

shade · physiology: photosynthesis · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.