Paper · 2004 · Maydica

Improving in vitro culture and regeneration conditions for Agrobacterium-mediated maize transformation [Zea mays L.]

E. Lupotto; Elena Conti; A. Reali; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Experimental conditions for improving the tissue culture regenerative potential and embryogenic capability of maize cultures after Agrobacterium-mediated transformation have been investigated. The parameters were investigated in five elite inbreds per se and in their crosses with A188. Embryogenic calli obtained from the inbreds spanned in a range of values from hardly responsive (11.5%) to highly responsive (79.1%) cultures. Immature embryos explanted from crosses of each inbred with A188 were all enhanced in their embryogenic and regenerative capability, with values ranging from 72.7 to 79.6%. The same genotypes, were subjected to Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, considering as target tissue either freshly explanted or five days-precultured immature embryos. Tissues were transformed with the Agrobacterium strain EHA105 with a standard binary vector based on pCAMBIA3301. The addition of 400mg/l L-cysteine in the co-cultivation step, as antioxidant to reduce callus necrosis, was also tested. Results indicated that addition of L-cys in the infection step with non pre-cultured embryos in general reduces regenerative capability, inhibiting the embryogenic development of the infected embryos. Conversely, the adoption of a pre-culture period of five days on callus induction medium, largely overcomes the inhibition. Calli treated and non-treated with L-cys exhibited comparable embryogenic potential; in addition, the regenerative capability was significantly enhanced. The protocol described is discussed as an improvement in Agrobacterium-mediated maize transformation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Embryogenic calli of five maize inbreds ranged from hardly responsive (11.5%) to highly responsive (79.1%)

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
five elite inbredse0
Outcome
responsivee1
Value
11.5%e1
Qualifier
79.1%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Agrobacterium-mediated maize transformation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“investigated in five elite inbreds per se and in their crosses with A188”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–285 · show in text ↑
e1

“Embryogenic calli obtained from the inbreds spanned in a range of values from hardly responsive (11.5%) to highly responsive (79.1%) cultures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–428 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Immature embryos from crosses of each inbred with A188 had 72.7 to 79.6% embryogenic and regenerative capability

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
crosses of each inbred with A188e2
Organ / stage
Immature embryose2
Outcome
embryogenic and regenerative capabilitye2
Value
72.7 to 79.6%e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Agrobacterium-mediated maize transformation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–102 · show in text ↑
e2

“Immature embryos explanted from crosses of each inbred with A188 were all enhanced in their embryogenic and regenerative capability, with values ranging from 72.7 to 79.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–601 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding L-cys in the infection step reduced regenerative capability of non pre-cultured maize embryos

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
non pre-cultured embryose3
Treatment
addition of L-cys in the infection stepe3
Outcome
regenerative capabilitye3
Direction
reducese3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Agrobacterium-mediated maize transformation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–102 · show in text ↑
e3

“addition of L-cys in the infection step with non pre-cultured embryos in general reduces regenerative capability, inhibiting the embryogenic development of the infected embryos”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1212 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five-day pre-culture on callus induction medium largely overcame the L-cys inhibition of regeneration

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
pre-culture period of five days on callus induction mediume4
Outcome
inhibitione4
Direction
overcomese4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Agrobacterium-mediated maize transformation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–102 · show in text ↑
e4

“the adoption of a pre-culture period of five days on callus induction medium, largely overcomes the inhibition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L-cys treated and non-treated calli had comparable embryogenic potential

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
L-cyse5
Outcome
embryogenic potentiale5
Direction
comparablee5
Comparator
non-treatede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Agrobacterium-mediated maize transformation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–102 · show in text ↑
e5

“Calli treated and non-treated with L-cys exhibited comparable embryogenic potential; in addition, the regenerative capability was significantly enhanced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1490 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Regenerative capability of maize calli was significantly enhanced

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
regenerative capabilitye5
Direction
significantly enhancede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Agrobacterium-mediated maize transformation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–102 · show in text ↑
e5

“Calli treated and non-treated with L-cys exhibited comparable embryogenic potential; in addition, the regenerative capability was significantly enhanced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1490 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The described protocol is an improvement for Agrobacterium-mediated maize transformation

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
an improvement in Agrobacterium-mediated maize transformatione6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Agrobacterium-mediated maize transformation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–102 · show in text ↑
e6

“The protocol described is discussed as an improvement in Agrobacterium-mediated maize transformation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1492–1592 · show in text ↑

in vitro · disease · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.