Paper · 2016 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Genotypically Identifying Wheat Mesophyll Conductance Regulation under Progressive Drought Stress

Katarina Olsovska; Marek Kovar; Marian Brestic; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
57
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Photosynthesis limitation by CO2 flow constraints from sub-stomatal cavities to carboxylation sites in chloroplasts under drought stress conditions is, at least in some plant species or crops not fully understood, yet. Leaf mesophyll conductance for CO2 (gm) may considerably affect both photosynthesis and water use efficiency (WUE) in plants under drought conditions. The aim of our study was to detect the responses of gm in leaves of four winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes from different origins under long-term progressive drought. Based on the measurement of gas-exchange parameters the variability of genotypic responses was analyzed at stomatal (stomata closure) and non-stomatal (diffusional and biochemical) limits of net CO2 assimilation rate (AN). In general, progressive drought caused an increasing leaf diffusion resistance against CO2 flow leading to the decrease of AN, gm and stomatal conductance (gs), respectively. Reduction of gm also led to inhibition of carboxylation efficiency (Vcmax). On the basis of achieved results a strong positive relationship between gm and gs was found out indicating a co-regulation and mutual independence of the relationship under the drought conditions. In severely stressed plants, the stomatal limitation of the CO2 assimilation rate was progressively increased, but to a less extent in comparison to gm, while a non-stomatal limitation became more dominant due to the prolonged drought. Mesophyll conductance (gm) seems to be a suitable mechanism and parameter for selection of improved diffusional properties and photosynthetic carbon assimilation in C3 plants, thus explaining their better photosynthetic performance at a whole plant level during periods of drought.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Progressive drought increased leaf diffusion resistance to CO2 flow in winter wheat.

Treatment
progressive droughte0
Outcome
leaf diffusion resistance against CO2 flowe0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑
e0

“progressive drought caused an increasing leaf diffusion resistance against CO2 flow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–867 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Progressive drought decreased net CO2 assimilation rate in winter wheat.

Treatment
progressive droughte0
Outcome
ANe0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑
e0

“progressive drought caused an increasing leaf diffusion resistance against CO2 flow leading to the decrease of AN, gm and stomatal conductance (gs)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–931 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Progressive drought decreased mesophyll conductance in winter wheat.

Treatment
progressive droughte0
Outcome
gme0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑
e0

“progressive drought caused an increasing leaf diffusion resistance against CO2 flow leading to the decrease of AN, gm and stomatal conductance (gs)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–931 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Progressive drought decreased stomatal conductance in winter wheat.

Treatment
progressive droughte0
Outcome
stomatal conductance (gs)e0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑
e0

“progressive drought caused an increasing leaf diffusion resistance against CO2 flow leading to the decrease of AN, gm and stomatal conductance (gs)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–931 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced mesophyll conductance inhibited carboxylation efficiency in winter wheat.

Outcome
carboxylation efficiency (Vcmax)e0
Qualifier
Reduction of gme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑
e0

“Reduction of gm also led to inhibition of carboxylation efficiency (Vcmax)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1021 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mesophyll conductance and stomatal conductance were strongly positively related during drought in winter wheat.

Outcome
gme0
Direction
positivee0
Qualifier
under the drought conditionse0
Comparator
gse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑
e0

“a strong positive relationship between gm and gs was found out indicating a co-regulation and mutual independence of the relationship under the drought conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1218 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal limitation of CO2 assimilation increased in severely stressed winter wheat plants, but less than mesophyll limitation.

Outcome
stomatal limitation of the CO2 assimilation ratee0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
severely stressed plantse0
Comparator
gme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑
e0

“In severely stressed plants, the stomatal limitation of the CO2 assimilation rate was progressively increased, but to a less extent in comparison to gm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1371 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-stomatal limitation became more dominant with prolonged drought in winter wheat.

Outcome
non-stomatal limitatione0
Direction
more dominante0
Qualifier
prolonged droughte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑
e0

“a non-stomatal limitation became more dominant due to the prolonged drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1454 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors proposed mesophyll conductance as a selection parameter for improved diffusion and carbon assimilation under drought.

Outcome
parameter for selection of improved diffusional properties and photosynthetic carbon assimilatione0
Qualifier
during periods of droughte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑
e0

“Mesophyll conductance (gm) seems to be a suitable mechanism and parameter for selection of improved diffusional properties and photosynthetic carbon assimilation in C3 plants, thus explaining their better photosynthetic performance at a whole plant level during periods of drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1456–1736 · show in text ↑

drought · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 22 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

drought · physiology: gas exchange · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

76 papers: 5 positive, 71 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

246 papers: 41 positive, 205 negative or no effect

204 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

242 papers more in this group

See all 246 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.