Paper · 2026 · Agriculture

Role of Nitrogen Fertilization in Mitigating Drought-Induced Physiological Stress in Wheat Seedlings

Wojciech Pikuła; Marta Jańczak-Pieniążek; Ewa Szpunar-Krok

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Drought stress is one of the major abiotic factors limiting crop growth and yield, particularly in wheat. Water deficit leads to reduced chlorophyll content, impaired photosynthetic performance, and decreased biomass accumulation. Nitrogen fertilization may influence plant physiological responses to drought; however, its capacity to alleviate drought-induced growth reduction remains uncertain. A pot experiment was conducted to evaluate the impact of different nitrogen-based fertilizers on wheat seedlings grown under irrigation level 60% PPW (control) and 30% PPW (drought stress) conditions, with balanced levels of phosphorus and potassium maintained in all treatments. Water deficit led to substantial reductions in chlorophyll content compared to optimally irrigated plants. Similarly, the performance index (PI) decreased by 139.3% at Term 1 (1 day after foliar nitrogen application) and 27.2% at Term 2 (7 days after application). The net photosynthetic rate (Pn) declined markedly under drought conditions and was not significantly improved by nitrogen fertilization, indicating a partial and mainly short-term physiological response to nitrogen under water deficit. The application of nitrogen fertilizers, particularly urea and Nitron S, modulated the relative chlorophyll content and selected chlorophyll fluorescence (Fv/Fm, Fv/Fo, PI) and gas-exchange (E, gs, Ci) parameters under drought conditions, mainly shortly after application. However, aboveground dry biomass under drought conditions was not significantly affected by any nitrogen fertilizer. Urea induced the most consistent short-term physiological responses under both irrigation regimes, with effects more pronounced shortly after application, whereas Nitron S showed fertilizer-specific effects under drought stress. Overall, the results demonstrate that foliar nitrogen fertilization can modulate short-term physiological responses of wheat seedlings to drought but does not translate into sustained improvements in Pn or biomass accumulation. In the context of climate change and increasing water scarcity, identifying nitrogen fertilizers that support physiological functioning without overestimating growth benefits has critical implications for sustainable wheat production. Optimizing nitrogen fertilization may, therefore, contribute to improved nutrient management strategies under water-limited conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced wheat chlorophyll content relative to optimal irrigation.

Treatment
Water deficite0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
reductionse0
Comparator
optimally irrigated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water deficit led to substantial reductions in chlorophyll content compared to optimally irrigated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–783 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat performance index decreased by 139.3% at Term 1 (1 day after foliar nitrogen application).

Treatment
foliar nitrogen applicatione0
Outcome
performance index (PI)e0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
139.3%e0
Qualifier
Term 1 (1 day after foliar nitrogen application)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the performance index (PI) decreased by 139.3% at Term 1 (1 day after foliar nitrogen application) and 27.2% at Term 2 (7 days after application).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–941 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat performance index decreased by 27.2% at Term 2 (7 days after application).

Treatment
foliar nitrogen applicatione0
Outcome
performance index (PI)e0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
27.2%e0
Qualifier
Term 2 (7 days after application)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the performance index (PI) decreased by 139.3% at Term 1 (1 day after foliar nitrogen application) and 27.2% at Term 2 (7 days after application).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–941 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought markedly reduced net photosynthetic rate.

Treatment
drought conditionse0
Outcome
net photosynthetic rate (Pn)e0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The net photosynthetic rate (Pn) declined markedly under drought conditions and was not significantly improved by nitrogen fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1078 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization did not significantly improve net photosynthetic rate under drought.

Treatment
nitrogen fertilizatione0
Outcome
net photosynthetic rate (Pn)e0
Direction
not significantly improvede0
Qualifier
under drought conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The net photosynthetic rate (Pn) declined markedly under drought conditions and was not significantly improved by nitrogen fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1078 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizers modulated chlorophyll content under drought shortly after application.

Treatment
nitrogen fertilizerse0
Outcome
relative chlorophyll contente0
Qualifier
mainly shortly after applicatione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of nitrogen fertilizers, particularly urea and Nitron S, modulated the relative chlorophyll content and selected chlorophyll fluorescence (Fv/Fm, Fv/Fo, PI) and gas-exchange (E, gs, Ci) parameters under drought conditions, mainly shortly after application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1451 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizers modulated chlorophyll fluorescence under drought shortly after application.

Treatment
nitrogen fertilizerse0
Outcome
chlorophyll fluorescence (Fv/Fm, Fv/Fo, PI)e0
Qualifier
mainly shortly after applicatione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of nitrogen fertilizers, particularly urea and Nitron S, modulated the relative chlorophyll content and selected chlorophyll fluorescence (Fv/Fm, Fv/Fo, PI) and gas-exchange (E, gs, Ci) parameters under drought conditions, mainly shortly after application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1451 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizers modulated gas exchange under drought shortly after application.

Treatment
nitrogen fertilizerse0
Outcome
gas-exchange (E, gs, Ci) parameterse0
Qualifier
mainly shortly after applicatione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of nitrogen fertilizers, particularly urea and Nitron S, modulated the relative chlorophyll content and selected chlorophyll fluorescence (Fv/Fm, Fv/Fo, PI) and gas-exchange (E, gs, Ci) parameters under drought conditions, mainly shortly after application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1451 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No nitrogen fertilizer significantly affected aboveground dry biomass under drought.

Treatment
nitrogen fertilizere0
Outcome
aboveground dry biomasse0
Direction
not significantly affectede0
Qualifier
under drought conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“aboveground dry biomass under drought conditions was not significantly affected by any nitrogen fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1461–1568 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea gave the most consistent short term physiological responses under both irrigation regimes.

Treatment
Ureae0
Outcome
physiological responsese0
Direction
most consistente0
Qualifier
under both irrigation regimese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Urea induced the most consistent short-term physiological responses under both irrigation regimes, with effects more pronounced shortly after application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1569–1722 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitron S produced fertilizer specific effects under drought.

Treatment
Nitron Se0
Outcome
fertilizer-specific effectse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitron S showed fertilizer-specific effects under drought stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1732–1797 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–100 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

131 papers: 16 positive, 115 negative or no effect

114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

127 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

fertilization · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

133 papers: 126 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 126 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

129 papers more in this group

See all 133 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

246 papers: 41 positive, 205 negative or no effect

204 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

242 papers more in this group

See all 246 papers →

fertilization · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

755 papers: 663 positive, 92 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 663 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

751 papers more in this group

See all 755 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.