Paper · 2016 · Acta Agrobotanica

The impact of drought stress on the yields and food value of selected forage grasses

Mariola Staniak

15
claims
24
verbatim quotes
21
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The aim of the study was to compare yields and nutritional value of selected species and cultivars of forage grasses under the optimal moisture conditions and long-term drought stress. The regenerative capacity of plants after dehydration was also assessed. The pot experiment was conducted in years 2009–2010 in IUNG-PIB’s greenhouse in Puławy, Poland. Nine cultivars of four species: Dactylis glomerata (‘Amera’, ‘Minora’), Festuca pratensis (‘Skra’, ‘Fantazja’), Festulolium braunii (‘Felopa’, ‘Agula’, ‘Sulino’), and Lolium multiflorum (‘Gisel’, ‘Lotos’) were investigated in well-watered conditions (70% field water capacity – FWC) and under a long-term drought stress (40% FWC). The study showed that stress caused by soil moisture deficiency significantly reduced yields of D. glomerata, F. pratensis, F. braunii, and L. multiflorum. The total yield of dry matter under stress conditions was about 31% lower, compared to the performance achieved on the optimally moisturized treatment. The smallest reduction in dry matter yield under the conditions of water deficit was recorded for D. glomerata, which makes it the most resistant to stress, followed by F. pratensis. The resistance of F. braunii and L. multiflorum to stress was similar and significantly lower. There was a various response of different grasses to the water stress. On the basis of the value of the DSI (drought susceptibility index), the tested cultivars were ranked depending on the sensitivity to drought, starting with the most resistant cultivar: ‘Minora’, ‘Skra’, ‘Fantazja’, ‘Amera’, ‘Sulino’, ‘Agula’, ‘Gisel’, ‘Lotos’, and ‘Felopa’. The digestibility of dry matter and nutrient value of the grasses depended on both the level of soil moisture and grass species. Under the water stress, the digestibility and protein value increased compared to the control objects. Lolium multiflorum and F. braunii had the best nutritional value, while D. glomerata – the weakest.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil moisture deficiency significantly reduced yields of Dactylis glomerata.

Taxon
D. glomerataDactylis glomeratae1
Treatment
soil moisture deficiencye1
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
well-watered conditionse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dactylis glomerata
Dactylis glomerata · TaxonW. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“stress caused by soil moisture deficiency significantly reduced yields of D. glomerata, F. pratensis, F. braunii, and L. multiflorum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–839 · show in text ↑
e2

“investigated in well-watered conditions (70% field water capacity – FWC) and under a long-term drought stress (40% FWC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–683 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil moisture deficiency significantly reduced yields of Festuca pratensis.

Taxon
F. pratensisFestuca pratensise1
Treatment
soil moisture deficiencye1
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
well-watered conditionse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Festuca pratensis
Festuca pratensis · TaxonT.Voekler · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“stress caused by soil moisture deficiency significantly reduced yields of D. glomerata, F. pratensis, F. braunii, and L. multiflorum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–839 · show in text ↑
e2

“investigated in well-watered conditions (70% field water capacity – FWC) and under a long-term drought stress (40% FWC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–683 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil moisture deficiency significantly reduced yields of Festulolium braunii.

Taxon
F. brauniie1
Treatment
soil moisture deficiencye1
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
well-watered conditionse2

Verbatim

e1

“stress caused by soil moisture deficiency significantly reduced yields of D. glomerata, F. pratensis, F. braunii, and L. multiflorum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–839 · show in text ↑
e2

“investigated in well-watered conditions (70% field water capacity – FWC) and under a long-term drought stress (40% FWC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–683 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil moisture deficiency significantly reduced yields of Lolium multiflorum.

Taxon
L. multiflorumLolium multiflorume1
Treatment
soil moisture deficiencye1
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
well-watered conditionse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium multiflorum
Lolium multiflorum · TaxonKristian Peters -- Fabelfroh 09:38, 2 January 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“stress caused by soil moisture deficiency significantly reduced yields of D. glomerata, F. pratensis, F. braunii, and L. multiflorum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–839 · show in text ↑
e2

“investigated in well-watered conditions (70% field water capacity – FWC) and under a long-term drought stress (40% FWC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–683 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under long-term drought stress, total dry matter yield of forage grasses was about 31% lower than under optimal moisture.

Taxon
forage grassest0
Treatment
stress conditionse3
Outcome
total yield of dry mattere3
Direction
lowere3
Value
31%e3
Comparator
optimally moisturized treatmente3

Verbatim

e3

“The total yield of dry matter under stress conditions was about 31% lower, compared to the performance achieved on the optimally moisturized treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–991 · show in text ↑
t0

“forage grasses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dactylis glomerata had the smallest dry matter yield reduction under water deficit and was the most resistant to stress.

Taxon
D. glomerataDactylis glomeratae4
Treatment
water deficite4
Outcome
dry matter yielde4
Direction
smallest reductione4
Qualifier
most resistant to stresse4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dactylis glomerata
Dactylis glomerata · TaxonW. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The smallest reduction in dry matter yield under the conditions of water deficit was recorded for D. glomerata, which makes it the most resistant to stress, followed by F. pratensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1174 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Festuca pratensis ranked second in resistance to stress, followed by Dactylis glomerata.

Taxon
F. pratensisFestuca pratensise4
Outcome
resistant to stresse4
Direction
followed bye4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Festuca pratensis
Festuca pratensis · TaxonT.Voekler · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The smallest reduction in dry matter yield under the conditions of water deficit was recorded for D. glomerata, which makes it the most resistant to stress, followed by F. pratensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1174 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistance of Festulolium braunii to stress was significantly lower.

Taxon
F. brauniie5
Outcome
resistance of F. braunii and L. multiflorum to stresse5
Direction
significantly lowere5

Verbatim

e5

“The resistance of F. braunii and L. multiflorum to stress was similar and significantly lower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1269 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistance of Lolium multiflorum to stress was significantly lower.

Taxon
L. multiflorumLolium multiflorume5
Outcome
resistance of F. braunii and L. multiflorum to stresse5
Direction
significantly lowere5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium multiflorum
Lolium multiflorum · TaxonKristian Peters -- Fabelfroh 09:38, 2 January 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“The resistance of F. braunii and L. multiflorum to stress was similar and significantly lower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1269 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tested cultivars were ranked by drought sensitivity using the drought susceptibility index (DSI).

Taxon
forage grassest0
Outcome
the tested cultivars were ranked depending on the sensitivity to droughte6
Qualifier
On the basis of the value of the DSI (drought susceptibility index)e7

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e6

“the tested cultivars were ranked depending on the sensitivity to drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1411–1483 · show in text ↑
e7

“On the basis of the value of the DSI (drought susceptibility index)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1409 · show in text ↑
t0

“forage grasses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–84 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Digestibility of dry matter and nutrient value of grasses depended on soil moisture level and grass species.

Taxon
forage grassest0
Treatment
level of soil moisturee1
Outcome
digestibility of dry mattere1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e1

“The digestibility of dry matter and nutrient value of the grasses depended on both the level of soil moisture and grass species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1618–1745 · show in text ↑
t0

“forage grasses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under water stress, digestibility and protein value of forage grasses increased compared with control objects.

Taxon
forage grassest0
Treatment
water stresse1
Outcome
digestibility and protein valuee1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
control objectse1

Verbatim

e1

“Under the water stress, the digestibility and protein value increased compared to the control objects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1747–1848 · show in text ↑
t0

“forage grasses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–84 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lolium multiflorum had the best nutritional value of the grasses tested.

Taxon
Lolium multiflorumLolium multiflorume1
Outcome
nutritional valuee1
Direction
beste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium multiflorum
Lolium multiflorum · TaxonKristian Peters -- Fabelfroh 09:38, 2 January 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Lolium multiflorum and F. braunii had the best nutritional value, while D. glomerata – the weakest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1850–1948 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Festulolium braunii had the best nutritional value of the grasses tested.

Taxon
F. brauniie1
Outcome
nutritional valuee1
Direction
beste1

Verbatim

e1

“Lolium multiflorum and F. braunii had the best nutritional value, while D. glomerata – the weakest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1850–1948 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dactylis glomerata had the weakest nutritional value of the grasses tested.

Taxon
D. glomerataDactylis glomeratae1
Outcome
nutritional valuee1
Direction
the weakeste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dactylis glomerata
Dactylis glomerata · TaxonW. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Lolium multiflorum and F. braunii had the best nutritional value, while D. glomerata – the weakest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1850–1948 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Dactylis glomerata (cocksfoot)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 2 positive, 9 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.