Paper · 2016 · Grass and Forage Science

Seed dormancy and dormancy‐breaking methods in Leymus chinensis (Trin.) Tzvel. (Poaceae)

X. Q. He; Y. R. Wang; X. W. Hu; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
20
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Leymus chinensis (Trin.) Tzvel. is a perennial grass with high productivity and forage value; however, poor stand establishment, often due to seed dormancy, limits its widespread use for forage production. To investigate the mechanism of seed dormancy and to develop effective methods of improving germination, the contribution of each part of the caryopsis to dormancy was investigated, and a number of single or combined dormancy‐breaking pre‐treatments were conducted using three seed lots. The palea, lemma, pericarp/testa, and endosperm all contributed to seed dormancy. The contribution of each part to dormancy was 23·4%, lemma; 6·2%, palea; 28·4%, pericarp/testa; and 42·0%, endosperm. Hull (palea and lemma) removal, pericarp/testa piercing, and soaking in distilled water or 30% sodium hydroxide (Na OH ) significantly decreased the percentage of dormant seeds (i.e. increased germination). Treating hull‐removed and pericarp/testa‐pierced seeds with gibberellic acid ( GA 3 ) also significantly decreased the percentage of dormant seeds. Compared with each of the single pre‐treatments, the combined pre‐treatment of pre‐soaking in water for 1 d, then 30% Na OH for 60 min and treating with 300 μ m GA 3 resulted in the highest germination (89%); and seed viability was 91%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lemma contributed 23·4% of seed dormancy.

Taxon
Leymus chinensis (Trin.) Tzvel.Leymus chinensist0
Organ / stage
lemmae0
Outcome
dormancye0
Value
23·4%e0

Verbatim

t0

“Leymus chinensis (Trin.) Tzvel.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“The contribution of each part to dormancy was 23·4%, lemma”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–643 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The palea contributed 6·2% of seed dormancy.

Taxon
Leymus chinensis (Trin.) Tzvel.Leymus chinensist0
Organ / stage
paleae0
Outcome
dormancye0
Value
6·2%e0

Verbatim

t0

“Leymus chinensis (Trin.) Tzvel.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“The contribution of each part to dormancy was 23·4%, lemma; 6·2%, palea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–656 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The pericarp/testa contributed 28·4% of seed dormancy.

Taxon
Leymus chinensis (Trin.) Tzvel.Leymus chinensist0
Organ / stage
pericarp/testae0
Outcome
dormancye0
Value
28·4%e0

Verbatim

t0

“Leymus chinensis (Trin.) Tzvel.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“The contribution of each part to dormancy was 23·4%, lemma; 6·2%, palea; 28·4%, pericarp/testa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–679 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The endosperm contributed 42·0% of seed dormancy.

Taxon
Leymus chinensis (Trin.) Tzvel.Leymus chinensist0
Organ / stage
endosperme0
Outcome
dormancye0
Value
42·0%e0

Verbatim

t0

“Leymus chinensis (Trin.) Tzvel.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“The contribution of each part to dormancy was 23·4%, lemma; 6·2%, palea; 28·4%, pericarp/testa; and 42·0%, endosperm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–701 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hull removal significantly decreased dormant seeds.

Taxon
Leymus chinensis (Trin.) Tzvel.Leymus chinensist0
Treatment
Hull (palea and lemma) removale0
Outcome
percentage of dormant seedse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Leymus chinensis (Trin.) Tzvel.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“Hull (palea and lemma) removal, pericarp/testa piercing, and soaking in distilled water or 30% sodium hydroxide (Na OH ) significantly decreased the percentage of dormant seeds (i.e. increased germination)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–908 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pericarp/testa piercing significantly decreased dormant seeds.

Taxon
Leymus chinensis (Trin.) Tzvel.Leymus chinensist0
Treatment
pericarp/testa piercinge0
Outcome
percentage of dormant seedse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Leymus chinensis (Trin.) Tzvel.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“pericarp/testa piercing, and soaking in distilled water or 30% sodium hydroxide (Na OH ) significantly decreased the percentage of dormant seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–879 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soaking in distilled water significantly decreased dormant seeds.

Taxon
Leymus chinensis (Trin.) Tzvel.Leymus chinensist0
Treatment
soaking in distilled watere0
Outcome
percentage of dormant seedse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Leymus chinensis (Trin.) Tzvel.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“soaking in distilled water or 30% sodium hydroxide (Na OH ) significantly decreased the percentage of dormant seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–879 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soaking in 30% sodium hydroxide significantly decreased dormant seeds.

Taxon
Leymus chinensis (Trin.) Tzvel.Leymus chinensist0
Treatment
30% sodium hydroxide (Na OH )e0
Outcome
percentage of dormant seedse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Leymus chinensis (Trin.) Tzvel.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“soaking in distilled water or 30% sodium hydroxide (Na OH ) significantly decreased the percentage of dormant seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–879 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Gibberellic acid treatment of hull-removed and pierced seeds significantly decreased dormancy.

Taxon
Leymus chinensis (Trin.) Tzvel.Leymus chinensist0
Treatment
gibberellic acid ( GA 3 )e0
Outcome
percentage of dormant seedse0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
hull‐removed and pericarp/testa‐pierced seedse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Leymus chinensis (Trin.) Tzvel.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“Treating hull‐removed and pericarp/testa‐pierced seeds with gibberellic acid ( GA 3 ) also significantly decreased the percentage of dormant seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–1056 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined pretreatment produced the highest germination, 89%, compared with single pretreatments.

Taxon
Leymus chinensis (Trin.) Tzvel.Leymus chinensist0
Treatment
pre‐soaking in water for 1 d, then 30% Na OH for 60 min and treating with 300 μ m GA 3e0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
higheste0
Value
89%e0
Comparator
each of the single pre‐treatmentse0

Verbatim

t0

“Leymus chinensis (Trin.) Tzvel.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“Compared with each of the single pre‐treatments, the combined pre‐treatment of pre‐soaking in water for 1 d, then 30% Na OH for 60 min and treating with 300 μ m GA 3 resulted in the highest germination (89%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1265 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed viability was 91% under the combined treatment.

Taxon
Leymus chinensis (Trin.) Tzvel.Leymus chinensist0
Outcome
seed viabilitye0
Value
91%e0

Verbatim

t0

“Leymus chinensis (Trin.) Tzvel.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“seed viability was 91%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1293 · show in text ↑

sodium hydroxide · growth · Leymus chinensisResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Gibberellic acid · growth · Leymus chinensisResults agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.