Paper · 1987 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Diurnal Chilling Sensitivity and Desiccation in Seedlings of Tomato

Ann I. King; Michael S. Reid

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
8
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Seedlings of six cultivars of tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) showed differences in chilling sensitivity depending on the time during the diurnal light/dark cycle when they were placed at low temperature. In all cultivars, sensitivity was highest when the chilling exposure started at the end of a dark period, although the magnitude of the diurnal variation differed among the cultivars. When roots were removed prior to or just after chilling, injury also appeared earlier in seedlings whose chilling was started at the end of a dark period. Seedlings chilled starting at different times during the diurnal cycle had similar stomatal conductance values during chilling. It appears that diurnal changes in chilling sensitivity are not due to altered root function during or following chilling exposure, nor to variations in desiccation during the chilling period resulting from diurnal differences in stomatal conductance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six tomato cultivars differed in chilling sensitivity by the time exposure began.

Material
six cultivarse0
Treatment
low temperaturee0
Outcome
chilling sensitivitye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings of six cultivars of tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) showed differences in chilling sensitivity depending on the time during the diurnal light/dark cycle when they were placed at low temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–220 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sensitivity was highest when chilling began at the end of darkness in all cultivars.

Taxon
cultivarse0
Treatment
chilling exposure started at the end of a dark periode0
Outcome
sensitivitye0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In all cultivars, sensitivity was highest when the chilling exposure started at the end of a dark period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 222–326 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The magnitude of diurnal sensitivity variation differed among cultivars.

Material
cultivarse0
Outcome
magnitude of the diurnal variatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the magnitude of the diurnal variation differed among the cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–404 · show in text ↑
t0

“Seedlings of Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With roots removed before or after chilling, injury appeared earlier when chilling began at the end of darkness.

Treatment
chilling was started at the end of a dark periode0
Outcome
injurye0
Direction
earliere0
Qualifier
roots were removed prior to or just after chillinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When roots were removed prior to or just after chilling, injury also appeared earlier in seedlings whose chilling was started at the end of a dark period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–559 · show in text ↑
t0

“Seedlings of Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedlings chilled at different diurnal times had similar stomatal conductance during chilling.

Treatment
chilled starting at different times during the diurnal cyclee0
Outcome
stomatal conductance valuese0
Direction
similare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings chilled starting at different times during the diurnal cycle had similar stomatal conductance values during chilling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–687 · show in text ↑
t0

“Seedlings of Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–67 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors infer that diurnal chilling sensitivity changes are not explained by altered root function or conductance-related desiccation.

Outcome
diurnal changes in chilling sensitivitye0
Qualifier
not due to altered root function during or following chilling exposure, nor to variations in desiccation during the chilling period resulting from diurnal differences in stomatal conductancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“diurnal changes in chilling sensitivity are not due to altered root function during or following chilling exposure, nor to variations in desiccation during the chilling period resulting from diurnal differences in stomatal conductance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–939 · show in text ↑
t0

“Seedlings of Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–67 · show in text ↑

cold · crop injury · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

light · crop injury · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 4 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.