Paper · 2014 · Vegetable Science

Effect of soil moisture regimes and mulch materials on growth, yield and economics of summer squash in Uttarakhand hills

Pramod Thapliyal; Lalit Bhatt; Shweta Uniyal; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A study was under taken to elucidate the effect of soil moisture regimes and mulch materials on plant growth, flowering, yield and economics of summer squash (Cucurbita pepo L.) under rain fed mid-hill condition of Uttarakhand during spring-summer seasons of 2010–11 and 2011–12. The experimental findings revealed that summer squash performance was significantly influenced by different soil moisture regimes and mulch materials. Among three soil moisture regimes, 20 to 25% soil moisture level was found to be the best with respect to plant growth characters, total yield (73.37 t ha−1), net return (Rs. 5, 68, 705.33 ha−1) and benefit-cost ratio (4.48). Similarly, out of two mulches, black polyethylene mulch was found best with respect to plant growth characters, total yield (72.13 t ha−1), net return (Rs.5, 51, 513.67 ha−1) and benefit-cost ratio (4.23). Out of the 9 treatment combinations, S1M1 (20 to 25% soil moisture range under black polyethylene mulch) had recorded maximum yield of 83.80 t ha−1 along with highest net profit of Rs. 6, 61, 439.00 ha−1 and benefit-cost ratio of 4.74, hence, recommended for commercial cultivation in Uttarakhand hills.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

20 to 25% soil moisture level was best among the three soil moisture regimes for plant growth characters.

Taxon
summer squasht0
Treatment
20 to 25% soil moisture levele0
Outcome
plant growth characterse0
Direction
beste0
Comparator
three soil moisture regimese0

Verbatim

e0

“Among three soil moisture regimes, 20 to 25% soil moisture level was found to be the best with respect to plant growth characters, total yield (73.37 t ha−1), net return (Rs. 5, 68, 705.33 ha−1) and benefit-cost ratio (4.48).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–656 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

20 to 25% soil moisture level was best among the three soil moisture regimes for total yield (73.37 t ha−1).

Taxon
summer squasht0
Treatment
20 to 25% soil moisture levele0
Outcome
total yielde0
Direction
beste0
Value
73.37 t ha−1e0
Comparator
three soil moisture regimese0

Verbatim

e0

“Among three soil moisture regimes, 20 to 25% soil moisture level was found to be the best with respect to plant growth characters, total yield (73.37 t ha−1), net return (Rs. 5, 68, 705.33 ha−1) and benefit-cost ratio (4.48).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–656 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

20 to 25% soil moisture level was best among the three soil moisture regimes for net return (Rs. 5, 68, 705.33 ha−1).

Taxon
summer squasht0
Treatment
20 to 25% soil moisture levele0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
beste0
Value
Rs. 5, 68, 705.33 ha−1e0
Comparator
three soil moisture regimese0

Verbatim

e0

“Among three soil moisture regimes, 20 to 25% soil moisture level was found to be the best with respect to plant growth characters, total yield (73.37 t ha−1), net return (Rs. 5, 68, 705.33 ha−1) and benefit-cost ratio (4.48).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–656 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

20 to 25% soil moisture level was best among the three soil moisture regimes for benefit-cost ratio (4.48).

Taxon
summer squasht0
Treatment
20 to 25% soil moisture levele0
Outcome
benefit-cost ratioe0
Direction
beste0
Value
4.48e0
Comparator
three soil moisture regimese0

Verbatim

e0

“Among three soil moisture regimes, 20 to 25% soil moisture level was found to be the best with respect to plant growth characters, total yield (73.37 t ha−1), net return (Rs. 5, 68, 705.33 ha−1) and benefit-cost ratio (4.48).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–656 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black polyethylene mulch was best among the two mulches for plant growth characters.

Taxon
summer squasht0
Treatment
black polyethylene mulche0
Outcome
plant growth characterse0
Direction
beste0
Comparator
two mulchese0

Verbatim

e0

“Similarly, out of two mulches, black polyethylene mulch was found best with respect to plant growth characters, total yield (72.13 t ha−1), net return (Rs.5, 51, 513.67 ha−1) and benefit-cost ratio (4.23).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–862 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black polyethylene mulch was best among the two mulches for total yield (72.13 t ha−1).

Taxon
summer squasht0
Treatment
black polyethylene mulche0
Outcome
total yielde0
Direction
beste0
Value
72.13 t ha−1e0
Comparator
two mulchese0

Verbatim

e0

“Similarly, out of two mulches, black polyethylene mulch was found best with respect to plant growth characters, total yield (72.13 t ha−1), net return (Rs.5, 51, 513.67 ha−1) and benefit-cost ratio (4.23).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–862 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black polyethylene mulch was best among the two mulches for net return (Rs.5, 51, 513.67 ha−1).

Taxon
summer squasht0
Treatment
black polyethylene mulche0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
beste0
Value
Rs.5, 51, 513.67 ha−1e0
Comparator
two mulchese0

Verbatim

e0

“Similarly, out of two mulches, black polyethylene mulch was found best with respect to plant growth characters, total yield (72.13 t ha−1), net return (Rs.5, 51, 513.67 ha−1) and benefit-cost ratio (4.23).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–862 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black polyethylene mulch was best among the two mulches for benefit-cost ratio (4.23).

Taxon
summer squasht0
Treatment
black polyethylene mulche0
Outcome
benefit-cost ratioe0
Direction
beste0
Value
4.23e0
Comparator
two mulchese0

Verbatim

e0

“Similarly, out of two mulches, black polyethylene mulch was found best with respect to plant growth characters, total yield (72.13 t ha−1), net return (Rs.5, 51, 513.67 ha−1) and benefit-cost ratio (4.23).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–862 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S1M1 produced maximum yield of 83.80 t ha−1 among nine combinations.

Taxon
summer squasht0
Treatment
20 to 25% soil moisture range under black polyethylene mulche0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
83.80 t ha−1e0
Comparator
9 treatment combinationse0

Verbatim

e0

“Out of the 9 treatment combinations, S1M1 (20 to 25% soil moisture range under black polyethylene mulch) had recorded maximum yield of 83.80 t ha−1 along with highest net profit of Rs. 6, 61, 439.00 ha−1 and benefit-cost ratio of 4.74, hence, recommended for commercial cultivation in Uttarakhand hills.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–1166 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S1M1 produced highest net profit of Rs. 6, 61, 439.00 ha−1 among nine combinations.

Taxon
summer squasht0
Treatment
20 to 25% soil moisture range under black polyethylene mulche0
Outcome
net profite0
Direction
higheste0
Value
Rs. 6, 61, 439.00 ha−1e0
Comparator
9 treatment combinationse0

Verbatim

e0

“Out of the 9 treatment combinations, S1M1 (20 to 25% soil moisture range under black polyethylene mulch) had recorded maximum yield of 83.80 t ha−1 along with highest net profit of Rs. 6, 61, 439.00 ha−1 and benefit-cost ratio of 4.74, hence, recommended for commercial cultivation in Uttarakhand hills.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–1166 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S1M1 produced highest benefit-cost ratio of 4.74 among nine combinations.

Taxon
summer squasht0
Treatment
20 to 25% soil moisture range under black polyethylene mulche0
Outcome
benefit-cost ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4.74e0
Comparator
9 treatment combinationse0

Verbatim

e0

“Out of the 9 treatment combinations, S1M1 (20 to 25% soil moisture range under black polyethylene mulch) had recorded maximum yield of 83.80 t ha−1 along with highest net profit of Rs. 6, 61, 439.00 ha−1 and benefit-cost ratio of 4.74, hence, recommended for commercial cultivation in Uttarakhand hills.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–1166 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–99 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

S1M1 is recommended for commercial cultivation in Uttarakhand hills.

Taxon
summer squasht0
Treatment
20 to 25% soil moisture range under black polyethylene mulche0
Outcome
recommended for commercial cultivatione0
Setting
Uttarakhand hillse0

Verbatim

e0

“Out of the 9 treatment combinations, S1M1 (20 to 25% soil moisture range under black polyethylene mulch) had recorded maximum yield of 83.80 t ha−1 along with highest net profit of Rs. 6, 61, 439.00 ha−1 and benefit-cost ratio of 4.74, hence, recommended for commercial cultivation in Uttarakhand hills.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–1166 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–99 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results differ

43 papers: 33 positive, 10 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

soil water · yield · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

soil water · growth · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

mulching · growth · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.