Paper · 2016 · Julius Kühn-Institut

A note on the development of a practical procedure for promoting the germination of dormant seed of grape (Vitis spp.)

Ellis, R. H.; Hong, T. D.; Roberts, E. H.

10
claims
18
verbatim quotes
24
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The effect of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), gibberellic acid (GA3) and a short exposure of imbibed seed to 3-5 °C (prechill) on grape seed germination were investigated factorially. All three factors had some effect, either singly or in combination with one or more of the other agents, in promoting the germination of dormant seed. 2,000 ppm GA3 was the best single agent for breaking dormancy but tetrazolium staining revealed that this treatment caused the death of a small proportion of seed. Comparison of germination tests at 20, 25, 30 and 35 °C showed 25 °C tobe the best constant temperature for rapid full germination. Seed were also tested for germination in two diurnal alternating temperature regimes - 20/30 °C and 20/35 °C, the higher temperatures being applied for 8 hin each 24 h cycle. The alternating temperature of 20/30 °C proved better for testing seed for germination than either 20/35 °C or 25 °C, the best constant temperature. The following germination test procedure was devised for grape seed: a 24 h soak in 0.5 M H2O2 , a further 24 h soak in 1,000 ppm GA3, followed by a 21 d prechill at 3-5 °C with subsequent testing for germination in a diurnal alternating temperature regime of 20/30 °C with the higher temperature being applied for 8 h in each daily cycle. This procedure was tested with dormant seed of seven lots of diverse origin and found to be very effective in promoting the germination of dormant seed whilst not damaging to other seeds. In the opinion of the authors the above procedure represents a suitable practical dormancy breaking procedure for seed of Vitis spp. Entwicklung eines brauchbaren Verfahrens zur Förderung der Keimung dormanter Samen der Rebe ( Vitis spp.) Die Grenzen und Möglichkeiten der vorhandenen Verfahren zur Samenkeimung bei Reben werden diskutiert. Folgendes Verfahren zur Prüfung der Keimfähigkeit von Traubenkernen wurde ausgearbeitet: 24 h lang Einweichen in 0,5 M H2O2, weitere 24 h lang in 1000 ppm GA3, danach 21 d lang Stratifikation bei 3-5 °C, anschließend Prüfung der Keimfähigkeit unter diurnalen Wechseltemperaturen von 20/30 °C (16/8 h). Dieses Verfahren, das an den Kernen von sieben Traubensorten erprobt wurde, erwies sich als wirkungsvoll bei der Keimungsförderung dormanter Samen und schonend gegenüber den anderen Kernen.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydrogen peroxide promoted germination of dormant grape seed, alone or in combination.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)e0
Outcome
germination of dormant seede0
Direction
promotinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), gibberellic acid (GA3) and a short exposure of imbibed seed to 3-5 °C (prechill) on grape seed germination were investigated factorially. All three factors had some effect, either singly or in combination with one or more of the other agents, in promoting the germination of dormant seed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–328 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gibberellic acid promoted germination of dormant grape seed, alone or in combination.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
gibberellic acid (GA3)e0
Outcome
germination of dormant seede0
Direction
promotinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), gibberellic acid (GA3) and a short exposure of imbibed seed to 3-5 °C (prechill) on grape seed germination were investigated factorially. All three factors had some effect, either singly or in combination with one or more of the other agents, in promoting the germination of dormant seed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–328 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prechilling promoted germination of dormant grape seed, alone or in combination.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
a short exposure of imbibed seed to 3-5 °C (prechill)e0
Outcome
germination of dormant seede0
Direction
promotinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), gibberellic acid (GA3) and a short exposure of imbibed seed to 3-5 °C (prechill) on grape seed germination were investigated factorially. All three factors had some effect, either singly or in combination with one or more of the other agents, in promoting the germination of dormant seed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–328 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 at 2,000 ppm was the best single dormancy-breaking agent.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
2,000 ppm GA3e0
Outcome
breaking dormancye0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“2,000 ppm GA3 was the best single agent for breaking dormancy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–390 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape (Vitis spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2,000 ppm GA3 treatment killed a small proportion of seed.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
2,000 ppm GA3e1
Outcome
death of a small proportion of seede0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“this treatment caused the death of a small proportion of seed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–492 · show in text ↑
e1

“2,000 ppm GA3 was the best single agent for breaking dormancy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–390 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape (Vitis spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among constant temperatures, 25 °C best supported rapid full germination.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
25 °Ce0
Outcome
rapid full germinatione0
Direction
beste0
Comparator
20, 25, 30 and 35 °Ce0

Verbatim

e0

“Comparison of germination tests at 20, 25, 30 and 35 °C showed 25 °C tobe the best constant temperature for rapid full germination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–624 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape (Vitis spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternating 20/30 °C was better for germination testing than 20/35 °C or constant 25 °C.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
20/30 °Ce0
Outcome
testing seed for germinatione0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
20/35 °C or 25 °Ce0

Verbatim

e0

“The alternating temperature of 20/30 °C proved better for testing seed for germination than either 20/35 °C or 25 °C, the best constant temperature.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–948 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape (Vitis spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–118 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The devised procedure effectively promoted dormant grape seed germination across seven lots.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
a 24 h soak in 0.5 M H2O2e1
Outcome
promoting the germination of dormant seede0
Direction
very effectivee0
Value
seven lotse0

Verbatim

e0

“This procedure was tested with dormant seed of seven lots of diverse origin and found to be very effective in promoting the germination of dormant seed whilst not damaging to other seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1476 · show in text ↑
e1

“a 24 h soak in 0.5 M H2O2 , a further 24 h soak in 1,000 ppm GA3, followed by a 21 d prechill at 3-5 °C with subsequent testing for germination in a diurnal alternating temperature regime of 20/30 °C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1217 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape (Vitis spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–118 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The devised procedure did not damage other grape seeds.

Taxon
grapet0
Outcome
not damaging to other seedse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“whilst not damaging to other seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1441–1476 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape (Vitis spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–118 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors consider the devised procedure suitable for practical dormancy breaking in Vitis seed.

Taxon
Vitis spp.Vitise0
Outcome
suitable practical dormancy breaking proceduree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the opinion of the authors the above procedure represents a suitable practical dormancy breaking procedure for seed of Vitis spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1477–1609 · show in text ↑

gibberellin A3 · growth · VitisResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

hydrogen peroxide · growth · VitisResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.