Paper · 2016 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Post-emergence herbicides for weed control in blackgram

Hemlata Nirala; Anamika Sonit; A.L. Rathore

2
claims
5
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Experiment was conducted in the Research cum Instructional Farm, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh during Kharif season 2009. The treatment comprised of 14 weed management practices and blackgram variety “TU94-2 ”. The results revealed that higher plant population, plant height, number of leaves, number of branches, dry matter accumulation, number of nodules, dry weight of nodules, crop growth rate, seed yield, weed growth rate, weed control efficiency and harvest index were obtained under hand weeding twice (20 and 40 DAS), followed by imazethapyr at 25 g/ha pre-emergence and minimum was obtained under unweeded check

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twice hand weeding produced higher plant growth and yield metrics than the other practices, followed by imazethapyr, with minima in the unweeded check.

Taxon
blackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
hand weeding twice (20 and 40 DAS)e0
Outcome
plant population, plant height, number of leavese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
unweeded checke0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher plant population, plant height, number of leaves, number of branches, dry matter accumulation, number of nodules, dry weight of nodules, crop growth rate, seed yield, weed growth rate, weed control efficiency and harvest index were obtained under hand weeding twice (20 and 40 DAS), followed by imazethapyr at 25 g/ha pre-emergence and minimum was obtained under unweeded check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–650 · show in text ↑
t0

“blackgram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twice hand weeding gave higher seed yield and harvest index, followed by imazethapyr, with minima in unweeded plots.

Taxon
blackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
hand weeding twice (20 and 40 DAS)e0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
highere1
Comparator
unweeded checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed yield, weed growth rate, weed control efficiency and harvest index were obtained under hand weeding twice (20 and 40 DAS), followed by imazethapyr at 25 g/ha pre-emergence and minimum was obtained under unweeded check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–650 · show in text ↑
e1

“higher plant population, plant height, number of leaves, number of branches, dry matter accumulation, number of nodules, dry weight of nodules, crop growth rate, seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–438 · show in text ↑
t0

“blackgram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–55 · show in text ↑

herbicide · pest · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

herbicide · yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

95 papers: 89 positive, 6 negative or no effect

88 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

91 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.