Abstract
The experiment comprised of packing okra pods in rigid plastic crates and LDPE bags of 25, 50, 75 and 100 micron thickness with subsequent storage at 12 and 16°C. Packaged okra pods in LDPE bags of 50 micron thickness and stored at 12°C emerged as the best post harvest treatment combination. Pods subjected to this treatment combination had the best visual appearance, lower chilling injury, lower physiological loss in weight and optimal marketability. This treatment combination suppressed quality deterioration and extended the shelf-life of okra by up to 12 days.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Packaging okra pods in LDPE bags of 50 micron stored at 12°C was the best post-harvest treatment combination.
- Taxon
- okra
.jpg?width=60)
Abelmoschus esculentuse1 - Treatment
- LDPE bags of 50 micron thickness and stored at 12°Ce1
- Outcome
- best post harvest treatment combinatione1
- Direction
- emerged as the beste1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“Packaged okra pods in LDPE bags of 50 micron thickness and stored at 12°C emerged as the best post harvest treatment combination”
Claim · model-written summary
Okra pods in the best combination had the best visual appearance.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse1
- Treatment
- LDPE bags of 50 micron thickness and stored at 12°Ce1
- Outcome
- visual appearancee2
- Direction
- beste2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Packaged okra pods in LDPE bags of 50 micron thickness and stored at 12°C emerged as the best post harvest treatment combination”
e2“Pods subjected to this treatment combination had the best visual appearance, lower chilling injury, lower physiological loss in weight and optimal marketability”
Claim · model-written summary
Okra pods in the best combination had lower chilling injury.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse1
- Treatment
- LDPE bags of 50 micron thickness and stored at 12°Ce1
- Outcome
- chilling injurye2
- Direction
- lowere2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Packaged okra pods in LDPE bags of 50 micron thickness and stored at 12°C emerged as the best post harvest treatment combination”
e2“Pods subjected to this treatment combination had the best visual appearance, lower chilling injury, lower physiological loss in weight and optimal marketability”
Claim · model-written summary
Okra pods in the best combination had lower physiological loss in weight.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse1
- Treatment
- LDPE bags of 50 micron thickness and stored at 12°Ce1
- Outcome
- physiological loss in weighte2
- Direction
- lowere2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Packaged okra pods in LDPE bags of 50 micron thickness and stored at 12°C emerged as the best post harvest treatment combination”
e2“Pods subjected to this treatment combination had the best visual appearance, lower chilling injury, lower physiological loss in weight and optimal marketability”
Claim · model-written summary
Okra pods in the best combination had optimal marketability.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse1
- Treatment
- LDPE bags of 50 micron thickness and stored at 12°Ce1
- Outcome
- marketabilitye2
- Direction
- optimale2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Packaged okra pods in LDPE bags of 50 micron thickness and stored at 12°C emerged as the best post harvest treatment combination”
e2“Pods subjected to this treatment combination had the best visual appearance, lower chilling injury, lower physiological loss in weight and optimal marketability”
Claim · model-written summary
The best combination suppressed quality deterioration of okra pods.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse1
- Treatment
- LDPE bags of 50 micron thickness and stored at 12°Ce1
- Outcome
- quality deterioratione3
- Direction
- suppressede3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Packaged okra pods in LDPE bags of 50 micron thickness and stored at 12°C emerged as the best post harvest treatment combination”
e3“This treatment combination suppressed quality deterioration and extended the shelf-life of okra by up to 12 days”
Claim · model-written summary
The best combination extended okra shelf-life by up to 12 days.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse1
- Treatment
- LDPE bags of 50 micron thickness and stored at 12°Ce1
- Outcome
- shelf-lifee3
- Direction
- extendede3
- Value
- up to 12 dayse3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Packaged okra pods in LDPE bags of 50 micron thickness and stored at 12°C emerged as the best post harvest treatment combination”
e3“This treatment combination suppressed quality deterioration and extended the shelf-life of okra by up to 12 days”
The same questions in other papers
storage · quality: general · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- negative
storage · quality: postharvest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →storage · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.