Paper · 1981 · Annals of Botany

Effects of Abscisic Acid on Growth of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L)

H. K. HALL; J. A. MCWHA

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
33
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Daily application of abscisic acid (ABA) to growing wheat plants, although initially inhibiting growth, resulted, after a short lag, in an increase in the number of leaves and tillers. This may have been due to reduced apical dominance. At 84 days the total dry weight and area of all leaves produced up to this time was less for the plants treated with ABA than for the control plants. However, the area of green, living leaves and the dry weight were not significantly affected by the ABA treatment. Further effects of the daily ABA treatment were the inhibition of transpiration, especially on the abaxial surface, the reduction of leaf size, the promotion of flowering and the stimulation of trichome formation on the leaf surfaces. ABA did not promote leaf senescence in whole plants and actually increased leaf longevity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Daily ABA initially inhibited wheat growth.

Treatment
abscisic acid (ABA)e0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
inhibitinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“Daily application of abscisic acid (ABA) to growing wheat plants, although initially inhibiting growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After a lag, daily ABA increased the number of wheat leaves and tillers.

Outcome
number of leaves and tillerse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“resulted, after a short lag, in an increase in the number of leaves and tillers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 104–184 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

ABA may have increased leaves and tillers by reducing apical dominance.

Outcome
reduced apical dominancee0
Qualifier
reduced apical dominancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“This may have been due to reduced apical dominance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–236 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 84 days, ABA-treated plants had lower total dry weight and leaf area than controls.

Treatment
ABAe0
Outcome
total dry weight and area of all leavese0
Direction
lesse0
Qualifier
At 84 dayse0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“At 84 days the total dry weight and area of all leaves produced up to this time was less for the plants treated with ABA than for the control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–386 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ABA did not significantly affect area of living green leaves or dry weight.

Treatment
ABA treatmente0
Outcome
area of green, living leaves and the dry weighte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“the area of green, living leaves and the dry weight were not significantly affected by the ABA treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–501 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Daily ABA inhibited transpiration, especially on the abaxial leaf surface.

Organ / stage
abaxial surfacee0
Treatment
daily ABA treatmente0
Outcome
transpiratione0
Direction
inhibitione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“the daily ABA treatment were the inhibition of transpiration, especially on the abaxial surface”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–616 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Daily ABA reduced wheat leaf size.

Outcome
leaf sizee0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“the reduction of leaf size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–644 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Daily ABA promoted flowering.

Outcome
floweringe0
Direction
promotione0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“the promotion of flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–672 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Daily ABA stimulated trichome formation on wheat leaves.

Outcome
trichome formatione0
Direction
stimulatione0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“the stimulation of trichome formation on the leaf surfaces.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–736 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ABA did not promote leaf senescence in whole wheat plants.

Treatment
ABAe0
Outcome
leaf senescencee0
Direction
did not promotee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“ABA did not promote leaf senescence in whole plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–788 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ABA increased wheat leaf longevity.

Treatment
ABAe0
Outcome
leaf longevitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“ABA did not promote leaf senescence in whole plants and actually increased leaf longevity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–827 · show in text ↑

(+)-abscisic acid · quality: postharvest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

(+)-abscisic acid · physiology: gas exchange · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

12 papers: 7 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

(+)-abscisic acid · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

49 papers: 29 positive, 20 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.