Paper · 1995

EFFECTS OF ORGANIC MANURE ON THE QUALTTY OF COCONUT SOILS

R. Mahindapala; S. Widanapathirana

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The performance of goat dung in gravel soil commonly found in coconut lands of the low country wet zone was investigated. Goat dung was applied at the rates of 18 and 24 kglpalmJyear and compared with treatments comprising recommended inorganic coconut fertilizer mixture (CU,) and the control (only dolomite). Dolomite at the rate of 500g/palm/year was included in all treatments as a basal application. The microbiological (i.e. total bacterial count, total fungal count, biomass C, CO, evolution, N mineralization rate, nitrification), chemical (i.e. total -N, available P, exchangeable K) and physical (i.e. moisture) changes of soil after the application of various treatments were assessed over a 12 month period. Application of organic manure supplemented with inorganic fertilizers and only inorganic fertilizer mixture, significantly iricreased (p I 0.001) microbial counts and microbiologically mediated processes in the soil compared with the control. Addition of goat dung supplemented with inorganics brought about significantly higher (p I 0.001) microbiological activity in the soil'over only inorganic fertilizer treatment. The microbiological parameters showed positive correla- tion with physical/chemical parameters. Important yield parameters of coconut such as female flowers, number of nuts and copra content per palm per year also showed increases of 49%, 61% & 58%, respectively in treated palms compared with control in the third year after the application of manure/fertilizer. Organic manure treated palms gave a significant increase (p S0.05, only in the female flower production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic manure with inorganic fertilizers increased soil microbial counts and mediated processes over control.

Taxon
COCONUTt0
Treatment
organic manure supplemented with inorganic fertilizerse0
Outcome
microbial counts and microbiologically mediated processes in the soile0
Direction
iricreasede0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Application of organic manure supplemented with inorganic fertilizers and only inorganic fertilizer mixture, significantly iricreased (p I 0.001) microbial counts and microbiologically mediated processes in the soil compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–961 · show in text ↑
t0

“COCONUT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inorganic fertilizer mixture increased soil microbial counts and mediated processes over control.

Taxon
COCONUTt0
Treatment
only inorganic fertilizer mixturee0
Outcome
microbial counts and microbiologically mediated processes in the soile0
Direction
iricreasede0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Application of organic manure supplemented with inorganic fertilizers and only inorganic fertilizer mixture, significantly iricreased (p I 0.001) microbial counts and microbiologically mediated processes in the soil compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–961 · show in text ↑
t0

“COCONUT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Goat dung with inorganics produced higher soil microbiological activity than inorganic fertilizer alone.

Taxon
COCONUTt0
Treatment
goat dung supplemented with inorganicse0
Outcome
microbiological activity in the soile0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
only inorganic fertilizer treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of goat dung supplemented with inorganics brought about significantly higher (p I 0.001) microbiological activity in the soil'over only inorganic fertilizer treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1138 · show in text ↑
t0

“COCONUT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–51 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil microbiological parameters correlated positively with physical and chemical parameters.

Taxon
COCONUTt0
Outcome
microbiological parameterse0
Direction
positivee0
Comparator
physical/chemical parameterse0

Verbatim

e0

“The microbiological parameters showed positive correla- tion with physical/chemical parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1234 · show in text ↑
t0

“COCONUT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Female flower number increased 49% in treated coconut palms versus control in year three.

Taxon
coconute0
Treatment
manure/fertilizere0
Outcome
female flowerse0
Direction
increasese0
Value
49%e0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Important yield parameters of coconut such as female flowers, number of nuts and copra content per palm per year also showed increases of 49%, 61% & 58%, respectively in treated palms compared with control in the third year after the application of manure/fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1502 · show in text ↑
e1

“Organic manure treated palms gave a significant increase (p S0.05, only in the female flower production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1504–1608 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nut number increased 61% in treated coconut palms versus control in year three.

Taxon
coconute0
Treatment
manure/fertilizere0
Outcome
number of nutse0
Direction
increasese0
Value
61%e0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Important yield parameters of coconut such as female flowers, number of nuts and copra content per palm per year also showed increases of 49%, 61% & 58%, respectively in treated palms compared with control in the third year after the application of manure/fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1502 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copra content per palm per year increased 58% in treated coconut palms versus control in year three.

Taxon
coconute0
Treatment
manure/fertilizere0
Outcome
copra content per palm per yeare0
Direction
increasese0
Value
58%e0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Important yield parameters of coconut such as female flowers, number of nuts and copra content per palm per year also showed increases of 49%, 61% & 58%, respectively in treated palms compared with control in the third year after the application of manure/fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1502 · show in text ↑

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Cocos nucifera (coconut palm)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · soil: biology · Cocos nucifera (coconut palm)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · phenology · Cocos nucifera (coconut palm)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.