Paper · 2012 · Plant Nutrition and Fertilizing Science

Effects of water management patterns and nitrogen fertilizer levels on nitrogen use efficiency of rice

Lin Xian-yong

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A two-year pot-culture experiment of rice cultivar,II You 838,with alluvial soil from Hubei was conducted to investigate the effects of two water management patterns and four nitrogen(N) fertilizer levels(N 0,126.0,157.5,210.0 kg/ha)on the aerial part biomass,N accumulation,N use efficiency.The results show that the aerial part biomass,N accumulation and N use efficiency of rice are obviously affected by the water management patterns,and the rice grain yield,N accumulation,N agronomic efficiency,N recovery efficiency,partial factor productivity and nitrogen physiological efficiency under the water-logging irrigation pattern are higher than those of the water-controlled irrigation pattern.The biomass and N accumulation of rice aerial parts are increased with the increase of nitrogen level,while the nitrogen agronomic efficiency,partial factor productivity of the applied N and N physiological efficiency are reduced.However,there are no significant differences between the 25% N saving from conventional nitrogen application rate(N 157.5 kg/ha) and the conventional nitrogen application rate(N 210.0 kg/ha).In general,the water-logging irrigation pattern combined with the 25% N saving from conventional nitrogen application rate is recommended as a better water and nitrogen application patterns due to its higher grain yield and nitrogen utilization.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water logging irrigation gave higher grain yield, nitrogen accumulation, and four nitrogen efficiency metrics than controlled irrigation.

Treatment
water-logging irrigation patterne0
Outcome
rice grain yield,N accumulation,N agronomic efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
water-controlled irrigation patterne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rice grain yield,N accumulation,N agronomic efficiency,N recovery efficiency,partial factor productivity and nitrogen physiological efficiency under the water-logging irrigation pattern are higher than those of the water-controlled irrigation pattern”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–696 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen increased aerial biomass and nitrogen accumulation.

Treatment
increase of nitrogen levele0
Outcome
biomass and N accumulation of rice aerial partse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The biomass and N accumulation of rice aerial parts are increased with the increase of nitrogen level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–798 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen reduced agronomic efficiency, partial factor productivity and physiological efficiency.

Treatment
increase of nitrogen levele1
Outcome
nitrogen agronomic efficiency,partial factor productivity of the applied N and N physiological efficiencye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while the nitrogen agronomic efficiency,partial factor productivity of the applied N and N physiological efficiency are reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–926 · show in text ↑
e1

“increase of nitrogen level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–798 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A 25% nitrogen saving did not differ significantly from the conventional rate.

Treatment
25% N saving from conventional nitrogen application rate(N 157.5 kg/ha)e0
Outcome
no significant differencese0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Comparator
conventional nitrogen application rate(N 210.0 kg/ha)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there are no significant differences between the 25% N saving from conventional nitrogen application rate(N 157.5 kg/ha) and the conventional nitrogen application rate(N 210.0 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1117 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–102 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend water logging irrigation with 25% nitrogen saving for grain yield and nitrogen use.

Outcome
water-logging irrigation pattern combined with the 25% N saving from conventional nitrogen application ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the water-logging irrigation pattern combined with the 25% N saving from conventional nitrogen application rate is recommended as a better water and nitrogen application patterns due to its higher grain yield and nitrogen utilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1362 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–102 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

511 papers: 402 positive, 109 negative or no effect

401 papers in the same direction as this paper · 101 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,171 papers: 906 positive, 265 negative or no effect

905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 201 in the opposite direction · 64 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,167 papers more in this group

See all 1,171 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

241 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,803 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.