Abstract
The effects of bagging on growth and quality of cucumber was studied using cucumber Zhongnong NO.8 as material and bagged fruit with PVC pellicle. Results showed that the best bagging time was the length of cucumber being 6~8cm. Compared with the contrast, the length, diameter, weight and growth rate of melon was increased by 21.6%, 17.1%,64.4% and 45%,respectively. Chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b were increased by 6.58 μg / mL and 4.01 μg / mL. The VC content was increased by 19.64 mg / 100 g. Bagging improved the content of water and soluble solids of cucumber. The deformed fruit rate decreased by 44.53%, with the improved sensory quality.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
The best cucumber bagging time was at fruit length 6~8cm.
- Taxon
- cucumber
Cucumis sativuse0 - Outcome
- best bagging timee0
- Value
- 6~8cme0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“best bagging time was the length of cucumber being 6~8cm”
Claim · model-written summary
Bagging increased fruit length by 21.6%.
- Taxon
- CucumberCucumis sativust0
- Treatment
- bagged fruit with PVC pelliclee0
- Outcome
- lengthe1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 21.6%e1
- Comparator
- the contraste1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cucumber”
e0“bagged fruit with PVC pellicle”
e1“Compared with the contrast, the length, diameter, weight and growth rate of melon was increased by 21.6%, 17.1%,64.4% and 45%,respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Bagging increased fruit diameter by 17.1%.
- Taxon
- CucumberCucumis sativust0
- Treatment
- bagged fruit with PVC pelliclee0
- Outcome
- diametere1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 17.1%e1
- Comparator
- the contraste1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cucumber”
e0“bagged fruit with PVC pellicle”
e1“Compared with the contrast, the length, diameter, weight and growth rate of melon was increased by 21.6%, 17.1%,64.4% and 45%,respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Bagging increased fruit weight by 64.4%.
- Taxon
- CucumberCucumis sativust0
- Treatment
- bagged fruit with PVC pelliclee0
- Outcome
- weighte1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 64.4%e1
- Comparator
- the contraste1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cucumber”
e0“bagged fruit with PVC pellicle”
e1“Compared with the contrast, the length, diameter, weight and growth rate of melon was increased by 21.6%, 17.1%,64.4% and 45%,respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Bagging increased fruit growth rate by 45%.
- Taxon
- CucumberCucumis sativust0
- Treatment
- bagged fruit with PVC pelliclee0
- Outcome
- growth ratee1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 45%e1
- Comparator
- the contraste1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cucumber”
e0“bagged fruit with PVC pellicle”
e1“Compared with the contrast, the length, diameter, weight and growth rate of melon was increased by 21.6%, 17.1%,64.4% and 45%,respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Bagging increased chlorophyll a by 6.58 μg / mL.
- Taxon
- CucumberCucumis sativust0
- Treatment
- Bagginge0
- Outcome
- Chlorophyll ae1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 6.58 μg / mLe1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cucumber”
e0“Bagging”
e1“Chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b were increased by 6.58 μg / mL and 4.01 μg / mL”
Claim · model-written summary
Bagging increased chlorophyll b by 4.01 μg / mL.
- Taxon
- CucumberCucumis sativust0
- Treatment
- Bagginge0
- Outcome
- chlorophyll be1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 4.01 μg / mLe1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cucumber”
e0“Bagging”
e1“Chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b were increased by 6.58 μg / mL and 4.01 μg / mL”
Claim · model-written summary
Bagging increased VC content by 19.64 mg / 100 g.
- Taxon
- CucumberCucumis sativust0
- Treatment
- Bagginge0
- Outcome
- VC contente1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 19.64 mg / 100 ge1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cucumber”
e0“Bagging”
e1“The VC content was increased by 19.64 mg / 100 g”
Claim · model-written summary
Bagging improved cucumber water and soluble solids content.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativuse0
- Treatment
- Bagginge0
- Outcome
- content of water and soluble solidse0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Bagging improved the content of water and soluble solids of cucumber”
Claim · model-written summary
Bagging decreased deformed fruit rate by 44.53%.
- Taxon
- CucumberCucumis sativust0
- Treatment
- Bagginge0
- Outcome
- deformed fruit ratee1
- Direction
- decreasede1
- Value
- 44.53%e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cucumber”
e0“Bagging”
e1“The deformed fruit rate decreased by 44.53%”
Claim · model-written summary
Bagging improved sensory quality.
- Taxon
- CucumberCucumis sativust0
- Treatment
- Bagginge0
- Outcome
- sensory qualitye1
- Direction
- improvede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cucumber”
e0“Bagging”
e1“with the improved sensory quality”
The same questions in other papers
trap barrier · physiology: pigments · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results differ
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →trap barrier · molecular: metabolites · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.