Paper · 2012 · Xi'nan Linxueyuan xuebao

Effect of Fertilization and BRs Application on Leaf Nutrition and Plant Growth of ‘Ganwu’ Clone of Camellia oleifera

Xiaomin Guo

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Taking chicken manure,compound fertilizer,bio-organic fertilizer,specialty fertilizer for camellia as basal dressing and BRs with different concentrations of 0.067 mg/L,0.033 mg/L and 0.020 mg/L as top dressing according to Split Plot Design method,a two-year experiment was conducted by successive sampling survey at different growing stages and specific indexes measurement to study the effect of applying varied types of fertilizers and different concentrations of BRs on the growth of ‘Ganwu’ Clone of Camellia oleifera.The results obtained were as follows:The optimal height growth of ‘Ganwu’ Clone plants was acquired by applying the compound fertilizer plus spraying 0.020 mg/L of BRs;the maximum increment of the crown amplitude was got by applying the specialty fertilizer plus spraying 0.020 mg/L of BRs.The highest SPAD value was obtained by spraying 0.033 mg/L BRs top dressing;the most increase of SPAD value was got by applying the specialty fertilizer plus top dressing with 0.067 mg/L of BRs.The highest N content in the leaves was got by spraying 0.067 mg/L of BRs without any fertilizer application,which was followed by applying the specialty fertilizer plus spraying 0.020 mg/L of BRs.The highest P content in the leaves was obtained by applying organic fertilizer plus top dressing with 0.020 mg/L of BRs;the highest K content in the leaves was realized by applying the compound fertilizer plus spraying 0.020 mg/L of BRs;whereas the highest dry matter content of leaves was obtained by applying the specialty fertilizer plus top dressing with 0.033 mg/L of BRs.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compound fertilizer plus spraying 0.020 mg/L of BRs gave the optimal height growth of Camellia oleifera.

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
Treatment
compound fertilizer plus spraying 0.020 mg/L of BRse2
Outcome
height growthe1
Direction
higherinferrede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Camellia oleifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–116 · show in text ↑
e1

“The optimal height growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–586 · show in text ↑
e2

“was acquired by applying the compound fertilizer plus spraying 0.020 mg/L of BRs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–691 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Specialty fertilizer plus spraying 0.020 mg/L of BRs gave the maximum increment of the crown amplitude of Camellia oleifera.

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
Treatment
specialty fertilizer plus spraying 0.020 mg/L of BRse3
Outcome
increment of the crown amplitudee3
Direction
maximume3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Camellia oleifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–116 · show in text ↑
e3

“the maximum increment of the crown amplitude was got by applying the specialty fertilizer plus spraying 0.020 mg/L of BRs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–813 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying 0.033 mg/L BRs as top dressing gave the highest SPAD value in Camellia oleifera leaves.

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
Treatment
spraying 0.033 mg/L BRs top dressinge4
Outcome
SPAD valuee4
Direction
higheste4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Camellia oleifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–116 · show in text ↑
e4

“the highest SPAD value was obtained by spraying 0.033 mg/L BRs top dressing”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 814–889 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Specialty fertilizer plus top dressing with 0.067 mg/L of BRs gave the largest increase in SPAD value of Camellia oleifera.

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
Treatment
specialty fertilizer plus top dressing with 0.067 mg/L of BRse5
Outcome
increase of SPAD valuee5
Direction
increaseinferrede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Camellia oleifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–116 · show in text ↑
e5

“the most increase of SPAD value was got by applying the specialty fertilizer plus top dressing with 0.067 mg/L of BRs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–1007 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying 0.067 mg/L of BRs without any fertilizer gave the highest N content in Camellia oleifera leaves.

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
Treatment
spraying 0.067 mg/L of BRs without any fertilizer applicatione6
Outcome
N content in the leavese6
Direction
higheste6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Camellia oleifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–116 · show in text ↑
e6

“The highest N content in the leaves was got by spraying 0.067 mg/L of BRs without any fertilizer application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer plus top dressing with 0.020 mg/L of BRs gave the highest P content in Camellia oleifera leaves.

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
Treatment
applying organic fertilizer plus top dressing with 0.020 mg/L of BRse7
Outcome
P content in the leavese7
Direction
higheste7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Camellia oleifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–116 · show in text ↑
e7

“The highest P content in the leaves was obtained by applying organic fertilizer plus top dressing with 0.020 mg/L of BRs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1325 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compound fertilizer plus spraying 0.020 mg/L of BRs gave the highest K content in Camellia oleifera leaves.

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
Treatment
applying the compound fertilizer plus spraying 0.020 mg/L of BRse1
Outcome
K content in the leavese1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Camellia oleifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–116 · show in text ↑
e1

“the highest K content in the leaves was realized by applying the compound fertilizer plus spraying 0.020 mg/L of BRs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1442 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Specialty fertilizer plus top dressing with 0.033 mg/L of BRs gave the highest dry matter content of Camellia oleifera leaves.

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
Treatment
applying the specialty fertilizer plus top dressing with 0.033 mg/L of BRse1
Outcome
dry matter content of leavese1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Camellia oleifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–116 · show in text ↑
e1

“the highest dry matter content of leaves was obtained by applying the specialty fertilizer plus top dressing with 0.033 mg/L of BRs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1451–1582 · show in text ↑

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Camellia oleifera (tea-oil Camellia)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Camellia oleifera (tea-oil Camellia)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · growth · Camellia oleifera (tea-oil Camellia)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Camellia oleifera (tea-oil Camellia)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · molecular: metabolites · Camellia oleifera (tea-oil Camellia)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · growth · Camellia oleifera (tea-oil Camellia)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Camellia oleifera (tea-oil Camellia)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.