Abstract
The trapped pest number under the high efficiency energy saving double-wave trapping light was 24.21% higher than that under the straight pipe double-waves trapping light, and the natural enemy number was 33.38% lower in average. Field survey indicated that the pest populations were reduced 43.33%～75%, the damage was decreased by 35.17%～78.57% and 44～272 yuan/667m~2 would be redeemed in earthnut and cauliflower fields. The new light wave peak value in this trapping light may result in its trapping capability.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
The new light trapped 24.21% more pests than the straight-pipe light.
- Taxon
- earthnut and cauliflower
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Bunium bulbocastanume1 - Treatment
- high efficiency energy saving double-wave trapping lighte0
- Outcome
- trapped pest numbere0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 24.21%e0
- Comparator
- straight pipe double-waves trapping lighte0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The trapped pest number under the high efficiency energy saving double-wave trapping light was 24.21% higher than that under the straight pipe double-waves trapping light”
e1“earthnut and cauliflower fields”
Claim · model-written summary
The new light trapped 33.38% fewer natural enemies on average.
- Taxon
- earthnut and cauliflowerBrassica oleracea var. botrytisBunium bulbocastanume2
- Treatment
- high efficiency energy saving double-wave trapping lighte1
- Outcome
- natural enemy numbere0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Value
- 33.38%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the natural enemy number was 33.38% lower in average”
e1“high efficiency energy saving double-wave trapping light”
e2“earthnut and cauliflower fields”
Claim · model-written summary
Field pest populations fell by 43.33%～75%.
- Taxon
- earthnut and cauliflowerBrassica oleracea var. botrytisBunium bulbocastanume1
- Outcome
- pest populationse0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 43.33%～75%e0
- Setting
- earthnut and cauliflower fieldse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the pest populations were reduced 43.33%～75%”
e1“earthnut and cauliflower fields”
Claim · model-written summary
Field damage fell by 35.17%～78.57%.
- Taxon
- earthnut and cauliflowerBrassica oleracea var. botrytisBunium bulbocastanume1
- Outcome
- damagee0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Value
- 35.17%～78.57%e0
- Setting
- earthnut and cauliflower fieldse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the damage was decreased by 35.17%～78.57%”
e1“earthnut and cauliflower fields”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors estimated returns of 44～272 yuan/667m~2 in the crop fields.
- Taxon
- earthnut and cauliflowerBrassica oleracea var. botrytisBunium bulbocastanume0
- Outcome
- redeemede0
- Value
- 44～272 yuan/667m~2e0
- Setting
- earthnut and cauliflower fieldse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“44～272 yuan/667m~2 would be redeemed in earthnut and cauliflower fields”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggested that the new light-wave peak may explain its trapping capability.
- Taxon
- earthnut and cauliflowerBrassica oleracea var. botrytisBunium bulbocastanume1
- Outcome
- trapping capabilitye0
- Qualifier
- new light wave peak valuee0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The new light wave peak value in this trapping light may result in its trapping capability”
e1“earthnut and cauliflower fields”
The same questions in other papers
trap barrier · pest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →light · pest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.